Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K4273021"

Revision as of 13:56, 12 October 2022

pTDH3-Np5598-tTDH1-pPGK1-Np5597-tPGK1-pTEF2-NlmysH-tSSA1

It was observed that among Nostoc punctiforme, Nostoc linckia, and Actinosynnema mirum, N. linckia was capable of producing palythine due to the existence of gene NlmysH, which removes a carboxyl group from shinorine to form palythine. Thus, we inserted pTEF2-NlmysH-tSSA1 to the genetic circuit of producing shinorine, allowing us to form this part. This part is within our part collection that allows efficiently production of MAAs in S. cerevisiae. Our part collection contains necessary genes to produce gadusol and the MAAs shinorine, porphyra-334, and palythine at a high rate. Xyl1, Xyl2, and Xyl3 are genes that allow S. cerevisiae to utilize xylose to produce S7P. DDGS and OMT converts S7P to the precursor of MAA, 4-deoxygadusol (4-DG). AGL converts 4-DG into M-glycine (MG). AlaL, by adding either serine or threonine, produces shinorine and porphyra-334, respectively. MysH could be added to the circuit of shinorine to produce palythine. S7P could also be converted into gadusol under the catalyzation of EEVS and M-Tox. In this part collection, we included multiple pathways and methods to increase the production of the upstream S7P and downstream MAAs. This part collection can provide inspiration and efficient methods to utilize the penta phosphate pathway or to produce other types of MAAs in S. cerevisiae for other teams.

Usage and Biology

We selected promoters pTDH3, pPGK1, and pTEF2 due to their stability expression in S. cerevisiae (Apel et. al., 2016). These promoters are shown to have stable and strong expression in YPD culture mediums. Among the three, pTDH3 has highest stability and strength, followed by pPGK1, then pTEF2. We used pTDH3 to express AGL, pPGK1 to express AlaL, and pTEF2 to express MysH.

Experiments

After obtaining shinorine, we could produce palythine by removing a carboxyl group from shinorine. Thus, we added pTEF2-NlmysH-tSSA1 to our Np5598-Np5597 combination to obtain the genetic circuit for producing palythine. We transformed the new palythine-coding plasmid into SC.L3 and SC.L6 to test the success of our optimization in SC.L6 (Nqm1::OMT-DDGS). We obtained L3:Np5598-Np5597-NlmysH and L6: Np5598-Np5597-NlmysH, fermented the two strains for 72 hours in SC-Ura culture medium with 1% glucose and 1% xylose. The absorption spectrum of the supernatant broth was tested, and results show that there is an obvious absorption peak at 320 nm. We also compared the production in L3:Np5598-Np5597-NlmysH and L6:Np5598-Np5597-NlmysH using OD 320 value, which shows that L6 strains are much more productive than L3 strains. The OD 320 value of L6 is 2.62 times of L3 strains, whereas L3 strains barely had any increase in UV absorption at 320 nm. Therefore, we concluded that we had successfully produced palythine and had greatly increased its production through optimization.

Figure 12: Palythine production in L9 and L5 strains. We transferred palythine plasmid Np5598-Np5597-NlmysH into the L3 and L6 strains (A). After 72 hours of fermentation, OD scanning results show that an absorption peak at was clear, but only in L9 strains (C). OD 320 value shows that L6 strains were much more effective in absorbing UV at 320 nm compared to L5 strains, and the value of OD320 of L9 is 2.62 times the control, justifying the production and optimization of palythine.

Sequence and Features