Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K4488027"
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Surface display of anti-sfGFP nanobody H using the bacterial protein Neae-intimin. The nanobody is a modification of PDB: 3OGO-H. There is a linker between the Neae-intimin gene and the nanobody sequence. It has been optimised to express in pUS250 TOP10 E.coli. | Surface display of anti-sfGFP nanobody H using the bacterial protein Neae-intimin. The nanobody is a modification of PDB: 3OGO-H. There is a linker between the Neae-intimin gene and the nanobody sequence. It has been optimised to express in pUS250 TOP10 E.coli. | ||
− | |||
===Usage and Biology=== | ===Usage and Biology=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Our project demonstrated that anti-sfGFP nanobody H binds to sfGFP through a GFP bindings assay. Therefore, nanobody H can be effectively surface displayed using Neae-intimin which provides preliminary evidence that other types of nanobodies can be displayed and later selected using the same construct. | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[File: Binding of anti-fuGFP Nanobodies to GFPs (400nm) .png|centre|thumb| 700px| Figure 1: Binding of anti-GFP nanobodies H, 2, 3, 6 and 7 to sfGFP, fuGFP and eGFP, measured on the plate reader at 400nm (full settings can be found <span class="plainlinks">[https://2022.igem.wiki/sydney-australia/protocols here]</span>). Measurements at 400nm are taken to optimise for fuGFP fluorescence. This graph shows no significant binding to fuGFP when compared to the Neae negative control.]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[File: Binding of anti-fuGFP Nanobodies to GFPs (470nm) .png|centre|thumb|700px| Figure 2: Binding of anti-GFP nanobodies H, 2, 3, 6 and 7 to sfGFP, fuGFP and eGFP, measured on the plate reader at 470nm (full settings can be found <span class="plainlinks">[https://2022.igem.wiki/sydney-australia/protocols here]</span>). This graph shows significant binding to sfGFP for nanobodies H, 2, 3 and 7 when compared to Neae negative control. Nanobody 6 does not appear to bind sfGFP more than the negative control. Nanobody H appears to bind the most to sfGFP.]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[File: sfGFP Binding Assay(470nm) .png|centre|thumb| 700px| Figure 3: Nanobody-GFP Binding Assay to validate H as a positive control and Neae-Intimin as a negative control for the binding to sfGFP. Measurements were taken at 470nm. Each bar is the average of 5 replicates, with error bars representing the standard error. Measurements were taken for a concentrated and equimolar amounts of GFP added to the nanobodies. Adding concentrated amounts of purified sfGFP markedly increased the error. Bars not sharing letters are significantly different based on a tukeyHSD post-hoc contrast.]] | ||
<!-- --> | <!-- --> |
Latest revision as of 10:49, 12 October 2022
Neae-intimin Construct Displaying anti-sfGFP Nanobody H
Surface display of anti-sfGFP nanobody H using the bacterial protein Neae-intimin. The nanobody is a modification of PDB: 3OGO-H. There is a linker between the Neae-intimin gene and the nanobody sequence. It has been optimised to express in pUS250 TOP10 E.coli.
Usage and Biology
Our project demonstrated that anti-sfGFP nanobody H binds to sfGFP through a GFP bindings assay. Therefore, nanobody H can be effectively surface displayed using Neae-intimin which provides preliminary evidence that other types of nanobodies can be displayed and later selected using the same construct.
Sequence and Features
Assembly Compatibility:
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
- 21COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
- 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
- 1000COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]