Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K4165074"

Line 56: Line 56:
 
                 Figure 1. this figure shows the results from the transcription and translation code showing the
 
                 Figure 1. this figure shows the results from the transcription and translation code showing the
 
       variation of mRNA and protein concentrations with time compared with the wet lab results (2mM IPTG concentration).
 
       variation of mRNA and protein concentrations with time compared with the wet lab results (2mM IPTG concentration).
===WetLab Results===
+
 
<p style=" font-weight: bold; font-size:14px;"> Transformation of His Trim21 (L) Doc in BL-21 using pGS-21a </p>
+
<html>
+
<p><img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4165/wiki/parts-registry/wetlab-results/trim-doc-pgs.jpg" style="margin-left:200px;" alt="" width="500" /></p>
+
</html>
+
                                    Figure 2. Transformed plate of His Trim21 (L) Doc + pGS-21a
+
<p style=" font-weight: bold; font-size:14px;"> Transformation of His Trim21 (L) Doc in DH-5 alpha using pJET vector </p>
+
<html>
+
<p><img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4165/wiki/parts-registry/wetlab-results/his-trim-doc-pjet.jpg" style="margin-left:200px;" alt="" width="500" /></p>
+
</html>
+
                                    Figure 3. Transformed plate of His Trim21 (L) Doc + pJET
+
<p style=" font-weight: bold; font-size:14px;"> Comparison between chemical lysis and sonication for His Trim21 (L) DOC </p>
+
<html>
+
<p><img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4165/wiki/data-analysis/sonication-or-chemical/sonication-or-chemical/trim-doc.jpg" style="margin-left:200px;" alt="" width="500" /></p>
+
</html>
+
Figure 4. This graph shows a significant difference between chemical lysis and sonication for His Trim21 (L) DOC, after we had the results we optimized our protocol to use sonication for His Trim21 (L) DOC
+
 
<!-- Uncomment this to enable Functional Parameter display
 
<!-- Uncomment this to enable Functional Parameter display
 
===Functional Parameters===
 
===Functional Parameters===
 
<partinfo>BBa_K4165074 parameters</partinfo>
 
<partinfo>BBa_K4165074 parameters</partinfo>
 
<!-- -->
 
<!-- -->

Revision as of 16:04, 11 October 2022


T7 promoter-6x His tag-TRIM21-DocS-T7 terminator

This part is composed of T7 promoter (BBa_K3633015), lac operator (BBa_K4165062), RBS (BBa_K4165075), 6x His tag (BBa_K4165020), TRIM21 (BBa_K4165001), (G4S)3 linker (BBa_K157013), DocS (BBa_K3396000), and T7 terminator (BBa_K731721).

Source

Synthesized

Usage and Biology

this part from the snith system which consists of the Trim part binds with the Docharin protein by a linker, this part will be purified using His tag.

Sequence and Features


Assembly Compatibility:
  • 10
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
  • 12
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
    Illegal NheI site found at 311
  • 21
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
  • 23
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
  • 25
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
    Illegal NgoMIV site found at 268
  • 1000
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]

Dry Lab

Modeling

After our Quality assessment process 2 Trim -the linker DoC model ranked first out of 15 models that were: 1- “peptide (trim-(GGGGS)3-docs) modeled by trrosetta model1.pdb” that had had score 5 with c beta deviation = 0 , clash score = 141.09 , molproberty = 2.61 , ramachandran favored = 98.57 , ramachandran outlier = 0, Q mean_4= 3.73 , Q mean_6 = 2.3


                      Figure 1. The 3D structure of the Trim Linker Docs model visualized by Pymol.


2- ”peptide (trim-(GGGGS)3-docs) modeled by trrosetta model3.pdb” with score 5 out of 6 , c beta deviation = 0, clash score= 140.33 , ramachandran favored = 99.43 , molproberty = 2.61, ramachandran outlier = 0 , Q mean_4 = 3.98 , Q mean_6 = 2.66


                      Figure 2. The 3D structure of the Trim Linker Docs model visualized by Pymol.

Mathematical modeling

Transcription rate and translation rate under T7 promotor

the mathematical modeling was based on our code for the calculation of transcription and translation (you can find it in the code section) beside with the estimated results from the wet lab.

                Figure 1. this figure shows the results from the transcription and translation code showing the
      variation of mRNA and protein concentrations with time compared with the wet lab results (1mM IPTG concentration).


                Figure 1. this figure shows the results from the transcription and translation code showing the
      variation of mRNA and protein concentrations with time compared with the wet lab results (2mM IPTG concentration).