Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K4197009"

 
(19 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
 
__NOTOC__
 
__NOTOC__
<partinfo>BBa_K4197018 short</partinfo>
+
<partinfo>BBa_K4197009 short</partinfo>
  
Gene coding for the egg allergen called Gal d 2.  
+
Gene fusion to express the egg allergen Gal d 2 on the surface of <i>E. coli</i>.  
  
 
<html>
 
<html>
  
 
<h2>Introduction</h2>
 
<h2>Introduction</h2>
<p>This part is composed of the gene coding for the allergen of Hen’s egg Gal d 2 (NCBI: <a "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/V00383.1/">V00383.1</a>). The Hen's egg allergy prevalence is 0,5-2,5% in developped countries and Gal d 2 compose 54% of its dry mass (Palosuo and al. 2018). Gal d 2 have already been expressed in <i>Express Iq E. coli </i>and was able to bind the IgE of patient with egg's allergie (Dhanapala and al. 2015). Gal d 2 was merged to the membrane protein OmpA of <i>E. coli </i> from part <a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1694002">BBa_K1694002</a>. This lippoprotein is the most abundant in <i>E. coli's </i>membrane with 100,000 copies per cell (Ortiz-Suarez and al. 2016) and is often used to display protein on the surface of bacteria (yang and al. 2016). </p>
+
<p>This part is composed of the gene coding for the allergen of hen’s egg Gal d 2 (NCBI: <a "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/V00383.1/">V00383.1</a>). The hen's egg allergy prevalence is 0,5-2,5% in developped countries and Gal d 2 compose 54% of its dry mass (Palosuo and al. 2018). Gal d 2 have already been expressed in <i>E. coli </i>and was able to bind the IgE of patient with egg's allergie (Dhanapala and al. 2015). Gal d 2 was merged to the membrane protein OmpA of <i>E. coli </i> (<a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1694002">BBa_K1694002</a>) to display Gal d 2 on the surface of <i>E. coli </i>. This lipoprotein is the most abundant in <i>E. coli</i>'s membrane with 100,000 copies per cell (Ortiz-Suarez and al. 2016) and is often used to display protein on the surface of bacteria (Yang and al. 2016). </p>
  
 
<h2>Construction</h2>
 
<h2>Construction</h2>
Line 15: Line 14:
 
<p>pET-21 b (+) vector was linearized by PCR using the high fidelity Phusion polymerase with  primers FORWARD:tgtcgacggagctcgaattcg and REVERSE:ttaaagcttgcggccgcactcg. Expected size of the amplicon was 5442 bp.</p>  
 
<p>pET-21 b (+) vector was linearized by PCR using the high fidelity Phusion polymerase with  primers FORWARD:tgtcgacggagctcgaattcg and REVERSE:ttaaagcttgcggccgcactcg. Expected size of the amplicon was 5442 bp.</p>  
  
<p>Amplification product sizes were checked on EtBr stained agarose gel (Figure 1).</p>
+
<p>Amplification product sizes were checked on Ethidium bromide stained agarose gel (Figure 1).</p>
  
 +
<div class="center">
 +
    <div class="thumb tnone">
 +
        <div class="thumbinner" style="width:80%;">
 +
            <a href="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4197/wiki/results/collection-of-allergens/pet-21-b-linearized-and-gal-d-2-fragment.png">
 +
                <img alt="" src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4197/wiki/results/collection-of-allergens/pet-21-b-linearized-and-gal-d-2-fragment.png" width="100%" height=auto class="thumbimage" /></a>                  <div class="thumbcaption">
 +
                <div class="magnify">
 +
                    <a href="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4197/wiki/results/collection-of-allergens/pet-21-b-linearized-and-gal-d-2-fragment.png" class="internal" title="Enlarge"></a>
 +
                </div>
 +
                <i><b>Figure 1: pET-21 b (+) linearized (A) and Gal d 2 amplified fragment (B). Expected sizes of the amplicons were 5442 bp (A) and 1675 bp (B).</b> PCR amplicon sizes of pET-21 b (+) (A) and Gal d 2 (B) were checked with agarose electrophoresis gel and revealed with EtBr. A theoretical gel is presented with each gel and the NEB 1 kb DNA ladder is used for the experimental gels. (note that a different ladder is presented on the theoretical gel).</i>
 +
             
 +
            </div>
 +
        </div>
 +
    </div>
 +
</div>
  
<figure class="normal mx-auto">   
 
                                            <img
 
                                                                        class="d-block"
 
                                                                        src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4197/wiki/results/collection-of-allergens/pet-21-b-linearized-and-gal-d-2-fragment.png" title= "Figure 1: pet lin and gal fragment" alt="Figure 2: pet lin and gal fragment"
 
                                                                        <figcaption class="normal"><span class="titre-image"><i><b>Figure 1: pET-21 b (+) linearized (A) and Gal d 2 amplified fragment (B). Expected sizes of the amplicons were 5442 bp (A) and 1675 bp (B).</b> PCR amplicon sizes of pET-21 b (+) (A) and Gal d 2 (B) were checked with agarose electrophoresis gel and revealed with EtBr. A theoretical gel is presented with each gel and the NEB 1 kb DNA ladder is used for the experimental gels. (note that a different ladder is presented on the theoretical gel).</i></span></figcaption>
 
                                        </figure>
 
  
 
<p>Amplification products matched the expected size, they were further purified from  gel.</p>
 
<p>Amplification products matched the expected size, they were further purified from  gel.</p>
Line 29: Line 36:
 
<p>The Gal d 2-OmpA construction was then inserted into pET-21 b (+) by In-Fusion. The resulting products were  transformed into Stellar competent cells. Transformants were selected on LB-ampicillin plates. 20 transformants were screened by colony PCR with primer pairs flanking the insertion zone (FORWARD: ggttatgctagttattgctcagc and REVERSE: ccgaaacaagcgctcatgagc, expected size of the amplicon : 2092 bp). 2 positive transformants were detected (Figure 3).</p>
 
<p>The Gal d 2-OmpA construction was then inserted into pET-21 b (+) by In-Fusion. The resulting products were  transformed into Stellar competent cells. Transformants were selected on LB-ampicillin plates. 20 transformants were screened by colony PCR with primer pairs flanking the insertion zone (FORWARD: ggttatgctagttattgctcagc and REVERSE: ccgaaacaagcgctcatgagc, expected size of the amplicon : 2092 bp). 2 positive transformants were detected (Figure 3).</p>
  
<figure class="normal mx-auto" style="width: 40vw;height: auto">   
 
                                            <img
 
                                                                        class="d-block"
 
                                                                        src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4197/wiki/results/collection-of-allergens/gal-d-2-screening.png" title= "Figure 2: gal screening" alt="Figure 2: gal screening" class="img-fluid"
 
                                                                        <figcaption class="normal"><span class="titre-image"><i><b>Figure 2: identifying fragments that bear pET21 b (+)_Ompa_Gal d 2 by colony PCR. Expected size of the amplicon was 2092 bp. The positive clones were colonies 17 and 24.</b> PCR amplicon sizes of colonies with Gal d 2 plasmid were checked with agarose electrophoresis gel and revealed with EtBr. A theoretical gel is presented with each gel and the NEB 1 kb DNA ladder is used for the experimental gels (note that a different ladder is presented on the theoretical gel).</i></span></figcaption>
 
                                        </figure>
 
  
<p>These transformants had their plasmid extracted by Miniprep and digested by EcoRV to assess the assembly (expected fragments at 4332 bp and 2785 bp, see Figure 4).</p>
 
  
<figure class="normal mx-auto" style="width: 40vw;height: auto">  
+
<div class="center">
                                            <img
+
    <div class="thumb tnone">
                                                                        class="d-block w-100"
+
        <div class="thumbinner" style="width:80%;">
                                                                        src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4197/wiki/results/collection-of-allergens/gal-d-2-digestion.png" title= "Figure 3: gal digestion" alt="Figure 3: gal digestion" class="img-fluid"
+
            <a href="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4197/wiki/results/collection-of-allergens/gal-d-2-screening.png">
                                                                        <figcaption class="normal"><span class="titre-image"><i><b>Figure 3: restriction profile of pET-21 b (+)_OmpA_Gal d 2 final construction. Enzyme used was EcoRV. Expected sizes of the amplicons were 4332 bp and 2785 bp.</b> Plasmids were checked with agarose electrophoresis gel and revealed with EtBr. A theoretical gel is presented with each gel and the NEB 1 kb DNA ladder is used for the experimental gels (note that a different ladder is presented on the theoretical gel).</i></span></figcaption>
+
                <img alt="" src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4197/wiki/results/collection-of-allergens/gal-d-2-screening.png" width="100%" height=auto class="thumbimage" /></a>                  <div class="thumbcaption">
                                        </figure>
+
                <div class="magnify">
 +
                    <a href="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4197/wiki/results/collection-of-allergens/gal-d-2-screening.png" class="internal" title="Enlarge"></a>
 +
                </div>
 +
                <i><b>Figure 2: identifying fragments that bear pET21 b (+)_Ompa_Gal d 2 by colony PCR. Expected size of the amplicon was 2092 bp. The positive clones were colonies 17 and 24.</b> PCR amplicon sizes of colonies with Gal d 2 plasmid were checked with agarose electrophoresis gel and revealed with EtBr. A theoretical gel is presented with each gel and the NEB 1 kb DNA ladder is used for the experimental gels (note that a different ladder is presented on the theoretical gel).</i>
 +
                </div>
 +
            </div>
 +
        </div>
 +
    </div>
 +
</div>
  
<p>The correct restriction maps were obtained and the insert sequence was further validated by sequencing. The plasmid was named <b>pET-21 b (+)_OmpA_Gal d 2</b>. The plasmids were eventually used to transform <i>E. coli</i> Tuner cells in order to express the OmpA_Gal d 2 construction at the cell membrane. But no proof was obtain of the expression. </p>
+
 
 +
<p>These transformants had their plasmid extracted by Miniprep and digested by EcoRV to assess the assembly (expected fragments at 4332 bp and 2785 bp, see Figure 3).</p>
 +
 
 +
 
 +
<div class="center">
 +
    <div class="thumb tnone">
 +
        <div class="thumbinner" style="width:80%;">
 +
            <a href="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4197/wiki/results/collection-of-allergens/gal-d-2-digestion.png">
 +
                <img alt="" src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4197/wiki/results/collection-of-allergens/gal-d-2-digestion.png" width="100%" height=auto class="thumbimage" /></a>                  <div class="thumbcaption">
 +
                <div class="magnify">
 +
                    <a href="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4197/wiki/results/collection-of-allergens/gal-d-2-digestion.png" class="internal" title="Enlarge"></a>
 +
                </div>
 +
                <i><b>Figure 3: restriction profile of pET-21 b (+)_OmpA_Gal d 2 final construction. Enzyme used was EcoRV. Expected sizes of the amplicons were 4332 bp and 2785 bp.</b> Plasmids were checked with agarose electrophoresis gel and revealed with EtBr. A theoretical gel is presented with each gel and the NEB 1 kb DNA ladder is used for the experimental gels (note that a different ladder is presented on the theoretical gel).</i>
 +
                </div>
 +
            </div>
 +
        </div>
 +
    </div>
 +
</div>
 +
 
 +
<p>The correct restriction maps were obtained and the insert sequence was further validated by sequencing.</p>
 +
<br>
 +
 
 +
<h2>Validation</h2>
 +
 
 +
<p>The plasmid was eventually used to transform <i>E. coli</i> Tuner cells in order to express the OmpA_Gal d 2 construction at the cell membrane. The expression and display controls should have been conducted using anti-Gal d 2 antibodies to check wether the allergen displayed on the bacteria were able to link to their specific IgE. However, due to the high price of these  IgE, the experiment was not performed. </p>
  
  
 
<h2>References</h2>
 
<h2>References</h2>
 +
 +
<p>More information about the project for which the part was created:<a href="https://2022.igem.wiki/toulouse-insa-ups/index.html"> DAISY (INSA-UPS 2022)</a> </p>
 +
 +
<p>Other parts to display allergens:<br>
 +
    - <a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K4197008"> OmpA_Ara h 2</a> <br>
 +
    - <a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K4197007"> OmpA_Ana o 3</a> <br>
 +
    - <a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K4197006"> OmpA_Der p 1</a> <br>
 +
</p>
 +
 
<ol>
 
<ol>
 
     <li>Dhanapala, P., Doran, T., Tang, M. L. K., & Suphioglu, C. (2015). Production and immunological analysis of IgE reactive recombinant egg white allergens expressed in Escherichia coli. Molecular Immunology, 65(1), 104–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molimm.2015.01.006</li>
 
     <li>Dhanapala, P., Doran, T., Tang, M. L. K., & Suphioglu, C. (2015). Production and immunological analysis of IgE reactive recombinant egg white allergens expressed in Escherichia coli. Molecular Immunology, 65(1), 104–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molimm.2015.01.006</li>
  
 
     <li>Palosuo, K., Kukkonen, A. K., Pelkonen, A. S., & Mäkelä, M. J. (2018). Gal d 1-specific IgE predicts allergy to heated egg in Finnish children. Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, 29(6), 637–643. https://doi.org/10.1111/pai.12954</li>
 
     <li>Palosuo, K., Kukkonen, A. K., Pelkonen, A. S., & Mäkelä, M. J. (2018). Gal d 1-specific IgE predicts allergy to heated egg in Finnish children. Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, 29(6), 637–643. https://doi.org/10.1111/pai.12954</li>
</ol>
 
  
 
<li>Ortiz-Suarez, M. L., Samsudin, F., Piggot, T. J., Bond, P. J., & Khalid, S. (2016). Full-Length OmpA : Structure, Function, and Membrane Interactions Predicted by Molecular Dynamics Simulations. Biophysical Journal, 111(8), 1692–1702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2016.09.009</li>
 
<li>Ortiz-Suarez, M. L., Samsudin, F., Piggot, T. J., Bond, P. J., & Khalid, S. (2016). Full-Length OmpA : Structure, Function, and Membrane Interactions Predicted by Molecular Dynamics Simulations. Biophysical Journal, 111(8), 1692–1702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2016.09.009</li>
Line 66: Line 106:
 
<!-- -->
 
<!-- -->
 
<span class='h3bb'>Sequence and Features</span>
 
<span class='h3bb'>Sequence and Features</span>
<partinfo>BBa_K4197018 SequenceAndFeatures</partinfo>
+
<partinfo>BBa_K4197009 SequenceAndFeatures</partinfo>
  
  
 
<!-- Uncomment this to enable Functional Parameter display  
 
<!-- Uncomment this to enable Functional Parameter display  
 
===Functional Parameters===
 
===Functional Parameters===
<partinfo>BBa_K4197018 parameters</partinfo>
+
<partinfo>BBa_K4197009 parameters</partinfo>
 
<!-- -->
 
<!-- -->

Latest revision as of 18:39, 10 October 2022

Gal d 2_OmpA fusion

Gene fusion to express the egg allergen Gal d 2 on the surface of E. coli.

Introduction

This part is composed of the gene coding for the allergen of hen’s egg Gal d 2 (NCBI: V00383.1). The hen's egg allergy prevalence is 0,5-2,5% in developped countries and Gal d 2 compose 54% of its dry mass (Palosuo and al. 2018). Gal d 2 have already been expressed in E. coli and was able to bind the IgE of patient with egg's allergie (Dhanapala and al. 2015). Gal d 2 was merged to the membrane protein OmpA of E. coli (BBa_K1694002) to display Gal d 2 on the surface of E. coli . This lipoprotein is the most abundant in E. coli's membrane with 100,000 copies per cell (Ortiz-Suarez and al. 2016) and is often used to display protein on the surface of bacteria (Yang and al. 2016).

Construction

OmpA_Gal d 2 fragment from IDT gblock was amplified by PCR using the high fidelity Phusion polymerase with primers FORWARD: gccgcaagctttaatgatggtgatggtgatggtgatg) and REVERSE: cgagctccgtcgacaaggaggtaatatacatatgaaagcc. Expected size of the amplicon was 1675 bp.

pET-21 b (+) vector was linearized by PCR using the high fidelity Phusion polymerase with primers FORWARD:tgtcgacggagctcgaattcg and REVERSE:ttaaagcttgcggccgcactcg. Expected size of the amplicon was 5442 bp.

Amplification product sizes were checked on Ethidium bromide stained agarose gel (Figure 1).

Figure 1: pET-21 b (+) linearized (A) and Gal d 2 amplified fragment (B). Expected sizes of the amplicons were 5442 bp (A) and 1675 bp (B). PCR amplicon sizes of pET-21 b (+) (A) and Gal d 2 (B) were checked with agarose electrophoresis gel and revealed with EtBr. A theoretical gel is presented with each gel and the NEB 1 kb DNA ladder is used for the experimental gels. (note that a different ladder is presented on the theoretical gel).

Amplification products matched the expected size, they were further purified from gel.

The Gal d 2-OmpA construction was then inserted into pET-21 b (+) by In-Fusion. The resulting products were transformed into Stellar competent cells. Transformants were selected on LB-ampicillin plates. 20 transformants were screened by colony PCR with primer pairs flanking the insertion zone (FORWARD: ggttatgctagttattgctcagc and REVERSE: ccgaaacaagcgctcatgagc, expected size of the amplicon : 2092 bp). 2 positive transformants were detected (Figure 3).

Figure 2: identifying fragments that bear pET21 b (+)_Ompa_Gal d 2 by colony PCR. Expected size of the amplicon was 2092 bp. The positive clones were colonies 17 and 24. PCR amplicon sizes of colonies with Gal d 2 plasmid were checked with agarose electrophoresis gel and revealed with EtBr. A theoretical gel is presented with each gel and the NEB 1 kb DNA ladder is used for the experimental gels (note that a different ladder is presented on the theoretical gel).

These transformants had their plasmid extracted by Miniprep and digested by EcoRV to assess the assembly (expected fragments at 4332 bp and 2785 bp, see Figure 3).

Figure 3: restriction profile of pET-21 b (+)_OmpA_Gal d 2 final construction. Enzyme used was EcoRV. Expected sizes of the amplicons were 4332 bp and 2785 bp. Plasmids were checked with agarose electrophoresis gel and revealed with EtBr. A theoretical gel is presented with each gel and the NEB 1 kb DNA ladder is used for the experimental gels (note that a different ladder is presented on the theoretical gel).

The correct restriction maps were obtained and the insert sequence was further validated by sequencing.


Validation

The plasmid was eventually used to transform E. coli Tuner cells in order to express the OmpA_Gal d 2 construction at the cell membrane. The expression and display controls should have been conducted using anti-Gal d 2 antibodies to check wether the allergen displayed on the bacteria were able to link to their specific IgE. However, due to the high price of these IgE, the experiment was not performed.

References

More information about the project for which the part was created: DAISY (INSA-UPS 2022)

Other parts to display allergens:
- OmpA_Ara h 2
- OmpA_Ana o 3
- OmpA_Der p 1

  1. Dhanapala, P., Doran, T., Tang, M. L. K., & Suphioglu, C. (2015). Production and immunological analysis of IgE reactive recombinant egg white allergens expressed in Escherichia coli. Molecular Immunology, 65(1), 104–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molimm.2015.01.006
  2. Palosuo, K., Kukkonen, A. K., Pelkonen, A. S., & Mäkelä, M. J. (2018). Gal d 1-specific IgE predicts allergy to heated egg in Finnish children. Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, 29(6), 637–643. https://doi.org/10.1111/pai.12954
  3. Ortiz-Suarez, M. L., Samsudin, F., Piggot, T. J., Bond, P. J., & Khalid, S. (2016). Full-Length OmpA : Structure, Function, and Membrane Interactions Predicted by Molecular Dynamics Simulations. Biophysical Journal, 111(8), 1692–1702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2016.09.009
  4. Yang, Chao; Zhao, Qiao; Liu, Zheng; Li, Qiyun; Qiao, Chuanling; Mulchandani, Ashok; et al. (2016): Cell Surface Display of Functional Macromolecule Fusions on Escherichia coli for Development of an Autofluorescent Whole-Cell Biocatalyst. ACS Publications. Journal contribution. https://doi.org/10.1021/es800441t.s001

Sequence and Features


Assembly Compatibility:
  • 10
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
    Illegal EcoRI site found at 130
    Illegal XbaI site found at 47
  • 12
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
    Illegal EcoRI site found at 130
    Illegal NheI site found at 92
    Illegal NheI site found at 741
    Illegal NotI site found at 1830
  • 21
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
    Illegal EcoRI site found at 130
    Illegal BamHI site found at 124
    Illegal XhoI site found at 1839
  • 23
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
    Illegal EcoRI site found at 130
    Illegal XbaI site found at 47
  • 25
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
    Illegal EcoRI site found at 130
    Illegal XbaI site found at 47
  • 1000
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]
    Illegal SapI.rc site found at 952