Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K4144010"
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
<div class="col-lg" style="margin:auto;text-align:center;"> | <div class="col-lg" style="margin:auto;text-align:center;"> | ||
<img style="margin:20px auto 5px auto;" src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4144/wiki/same-part/bba-k414410/picture1.png" width="80%"> | <img style="margin:20px auto 5px auto;" src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4144/wiki/same-part/bba-k414410/picture1.png" width="80%"> | ||
| − | <p style="color:Gray; padding:0px 30px 10px;">Figure. 1 | + | <p style="color:Gray; padding:0px 30px 10px;">Figure. 1 Linker addition design into opPet8p::sfGFP recombined protein</p> |
</div> | </div> | ||
</html> | </html> | ||
Revision as of 07:34, 8 October 2022
Improved recombined SAMe transporter opPet8p fused with linker
Usage and Biology
Linkers can be classified into three groups: flexible, rigid and cleavable. Flexible linkers are generally composed of small, non-polar or polar residues such as Gly, Ser and Thr. The most common is the (Gly4Ser)n linker (Gly–Gly–Gly–Gly–Ser)n, where n indicates the number of repeats of the motif. Polyglycine linkers have also been evaluated, but the addition of a polar residue such as serine can reduce linker–protein interactions and preserve protein function. Due to their flexibility, these linkers are unstructured and thus provided limited domain separation in a previous study.
We WHU-China plan to use such linker to contact opPet8p and sfGFP in order to avoid the opPet8p membrane localization disruption by adding a sfGFP tag.
Figure. 1 Linker addition design into opPet8p::sfGFP recombined protein
Sequence and Features
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]Illegal NheI site found at 520
- 21INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]Illegal BglII site found at 390
Illegal BamHI site found at 1018 - 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]Illegal AgeI site found at 1642
- 1000COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]