Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K4387996"
Line 3: Line 3:
 
<partinfo>BBa_K4387996 short</partinfo>
 
<partinfo>BBa_K4387996 short</partinfo>
  
−
Single domain antibodies are also called VHH or Nanobody®, only consisting of a single variable domain, which is able to bind to a specific antigen. The small size of nanobodies (15 - 20kDa) compared to anibodies, give them special abilities, which are hard to reach with conventional antibodies. They can locally penetrate barriers (such as tissues) more easily and can withstand extreme environmental conditions, such as high temperatures and low pH. They show high affinity and stability and recombinant expression has revolutionized the biotechnology field.  
+
Single domain antibodies, also called VHH or Nanobody®, only consist of a single variable domain, which is able to bind to a specific antigen. The small size of nanobodies (15 - 20kDa) compared to anibodies, gives them special abilities, which are hard to reach with conventional antibodies. They can locally penetrate barriers (such as tissues) more easily and can withstand extreme environmental conditions, such as high temperatures and low pH. They show high affinity and stability, and recombinant expression has revolutionized the biotechnology field. Nanobodies have already been discovered in camelid animals back in the 90's. Usage of these nanobodies in the clinic often requires an additional step called "humanization" in order to reduce unwanted immunological reactions upon administration. This step describes the exchange of one or a few specific amino acids that are recognized as "foreign" by the human immune system. Still today, camelid animals are infected with the antigen of choice and effective nanobodies are obtained from their blood. However, new manufacturing technologies have been developed, allowing the screening of new candidates by using naive or synthetic libraries in combination with phage and ribosome display. The usage of synthetic libraries results in the generation of so called "sybodies". [2] Generating new nanobodies against a target is a time-consuming process with several selection steps. Therefore, we used the amino acid sequences for specific anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNFa) nanobodies from a patent and converted them to DNA sequences. [3] The patent contains a variety of TNF-binding nanobodies. We selected 3 candidates (VHH#2B, VHH#3E and VHH#12B) based on their humanization characteristics. The patent described a complete humanization protocol for nanobody VHH#3E which we applied. The candidates VHH#2B and VHH#12B were described as already suitable for clinical applications due to their >90% amino acid sequence homology to human VH framework regions and are therefore possibly "safe" for direct administration to patients. The nanobody described below is the monovalent candidate VHH#2B.
−
Nanobodies have been discovered in camelid animals, already back in the 90's. Usage of these nanobodies in the clinic often requires an additional step called "humanization" in order to reduce unwanted immunological reactions upon administration. This step describes the exchange of one or a few specific amino acids that are recognized as "foreign" by the human immune system. Still today, camelid animals are infected with the antigen of choice and effective nanobodies are obtained from their blood. However, new manufacturing technologies have been developed, allowing the screening of new candidates by using naive or synthetic libraries in combination with phage and ribsome display. The usage of synthetic libraries results in the generation of so called "sybodies". [2]  
+
−
Generating new nanobodies against a target is a time-consuming process with several selection steps. Therefore, we used the amino acid sequences for specific anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) nanobodies from a patent and converted them to DNA sequences. [3] The patent contains a variety of TNF-binding nanobodies. We selected 3 candidates (VHH#2B, VHH#3E and VHH#12B) based on their humanization characteristics. The patent described a complete humanization protocol for nanobody VHH3E which we applied. The candidates VHH2B and VHH12B were described as already suitable for clinical applications due to their >90% amino acid sequence homology to human VH framework regions and are therefore possibly "safe" for direct administration to patients. The nanobody described below is the monovalent candidate VHH#2B.
+
  
 
<!-- -->
 
<!-- -->
 
<span class='h3bb'>Sequence and Features</span>
 
<span class='h3bb'>Sequence and Features</span>
 
<partinfo>BBa_K4387996 SequenceAndFeatures</partinfo>
 
<partinfo>BBa_K4387996 SequenceAndFeatures</partinfo>
 +
 +
==Characterization==
 +
===Purification of nanobodies===
 +
To show the TNFa-binding capacity of the nanobody and the inhibitory effect, we first inserted the nanobody sequence into the expression vector pSBinit by FX-cloning using the restriction enzyme SapI. The common lab strain E. coli MC1061 was transformed with the plasmid and nanobody expression was induced with arabinose. The nanobodies were extracted via periplasmic extraction (for monovalent constructs) or whole cell lysis (for bivalent constructs). Afterwards, they were purified via immobilized metal anion chromatography (IMAC). To insure, that the desired product was produced, we ran a native PAGE (Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis) on the purified fractions (Figure 1).
 +
 +
---Figure 1---
 +
 +
===ELISA===
 +
To proof the binding capacity of bacterially expressed anti-TNFa nanobodies, we conducted an ELISA with all purified candidates (Figure 2). We could show that all candidates successfully bind TNFa. Adalimumab is a monoclonal antibody that is already used in the clinics for anti-TNFa therapies in IBD patients. It served as a positive control. A random sybody against a membrane protein was used as a negative control.
 +
 +
---Figure 2---
 +
 +
===Cell Assay===
 +
Lastly, we wanted to see if the nanobodies show an observable inhibitory effect on the immune response of human monocytes. We used the human monocytic cell line THP-1 and incubated the cells firstly with the nanobody candidates and Adalimumab. Afterwards, they were stimulated for 24 hours with different doses of TNF, triggering their immune response. Successful inhibition of TNF by the nanobody or Adalimumab is expected to reduce the inflammatory response of the monocytes. To quantify this, we isolated the cells’ RNA and performed a reverse transcription. We then compared the IL-1ß expression levels to the house-keeping gene GAPDH by quantitative real time PCR (qRT PCR). IL-1ß is a major inflammation mediator and a good marker for the intensity of the monocytic immune response that we induced with TNFa. Figure 3 shows the overall performance of the monovalent candidate VHH#2B. Adalimumab served as a positive control.
 +
 +
---Figure 3---
  
  

Revision as of 09:38, 3 October 2022


Monovalent Anti-Tumour Necrosis Factor Nanobody (VHH#2B)

Single domain antibodies, also called VHH or Nanobody®, only consist of a single variable domain, which is able to bind to a specific antigen. The small size of nanobodies (15 - 20kDa) compared to anibodies, gives them special abilities, which are hard to reach with conventional antibodies. They can locally penetrate barriers (such as tissues) more easily and can withstand extreme environmental conditions, such as high temperatures and low pH. They show high affinity and stability, and recombinant expression has revolutionized the biotechnology field. Nanobodies have already been discovered in camelid animals back in the 90's. Usage of these nanobodies in the clinic often requires an additional step called "humanization" in order to reduce unwanted immunological reactions upon administration. This step describes the exchange of one or a few specific amino acids that are recognized as "foreign" by the human immune system. Still today, camelid animals are infected with the antigen of choice and effective nanobodies are obtained from their blood. However, new manufacturing technologies have been developed, allowing the screening of new candidates by using naive or synthetic libraries in combination with phage and ribosome display. The usage of synthetic libraries results in the generation of so called "sybodies". [2] Generating new nanobodies against a target is a time-consuming process with several selection steps. Therefore, we used the amino acid sequences for specific anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNFa) nanobodies from a patent and converted them to DNA sequences. [3] The patent contains a variety of TNF-binding nanobodies. We selected 3 candidates (VHH#2B, VHH#3E and VHH#12B) based on their humanization characteristics. The patent described a complete humanization protocol for nanobody VHH#3E which we applied. The candidates VHH#2B and VHH#12B were described as already suitable for clinical applications due to their >90% amino acid sequence homology to human VH framework regions and are therefore possibly "safe" for direct administration to patients. The nanobody described below is the monovalent candidate VHH#2B.

Sequence and Features


Assembly Compatibility:
  • 10
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
  • 12
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
  • 21
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
  • 23
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
  • 25
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
  • 1000
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]

Characterization

Purification of nanobodies

To show the TNFa-binding capacity of the nanobody and the inhibitory effect, we first inserted the nanobody sequence into the expression vector pSBinit by FX-cloning using the restriction enzyme SapI. The common lab strain E. coli MC1061 was transformed with the plasmid and nanobody expression was induced with arabinose. The nanobodies were extracted via periplasmic extraction (for monovalent constructs) or whole cell lysis (for bivalent constructs). Afterwards, they were purified via immobilized metal anion chromatography (IMAC). To insure, that the desired product was produced, we ran a native PAGE (Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis) on the purified fractions (Figure 1).

---Figure 1---

ELISA

To proof the binding capacity of bacterially expressed anti-TNFa nanobodies, we conducted an ELISA with all purified candidates (Figure 2). We could show that all candidates successfully bind TNFa. Adalimumab is a monoclonal antibody that is already used in the clinics for anti-TNFa therapies in IBD patients. It served as a positive control. A random sybody against a membrane protein was used as a negative control.

---Figure 2---

Cell Assay

Lastly, we wanted to see if the nanobodies show an observable inhibitory effect on the immune response of human monocytes. We used the human monocytic cell line THP-1 and incubated the cells firstly with the nanobody candidates and Adalimumab. Afterwards, they were stimulated for 24 hours with different doses of TNF, triggering their immune response. Successful inhibition of TNF by the nanobody or Adalimumab is expected to reduce the inflammatory response of the monocytes. To quantify this, we isolated the cells’ RNA and performed a reverse transcription. We then compared the IL-1ß expression levels to the house-keeping gene GAPDH by quantitative real time PCR (qRT PCR). IL-1ß is a major inflammation mediator and a good marker for the intensity of the monocytic immune response that we induced with TNFa. Figure 3 shows the overall performance of the monovalent candidate VHH#2B. Adalimumab served as a positive control.

---Figure 3---