Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K4083006"
Arsenorazbek (Talk | contribs) |
(→Part functionality) |
||
(6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
===Usage and Biology=== | ===Usage and Biology=== | ||
− | P. aeruginosa is a gram-negative bacillus and opportunistic pathogen. It secretes rhamnolipids - the rhamnose containing glycolipid biosurfactant. These biosurfactants are used by P. aeruginosa to emulsify the oil substances for easy digestion. Thus, rhamnolipids can increase the availability of fats which can be important in many different areas like petroleum, bioremediation, cosmetics, food, agriculture, etc. [1] However, due to the toxicity and infectiousness of P. aeruginosa, other alternative organisms are tested. Currently, genetically engineered Pseudomonas putida has more promising results than others. P. putida only lacks two enzymes for mono-rhamnolipid production: RhlA and RhlB. These enzymes are encoded by rhlA and rhlB coding regions in rhlAB operon. It was previously thought that rhlA and rhlB forms heterodimer, however, further research showed that they act independently from each other [2]. | + | <em>P. aeruginosa</em> is a gram-negative bacillus and opportunistic pathogen. It secretes rhamnolipids - the rhamnose containing glycolipid biosurfactant. These biosurfactants are used by <em>P. aeruginosa</em> to emulsify the oil substances for easy digestion. Thus, rhamnolipids can increase the availability of fats which can be important in many different areas like petroleum, bioremediation, cosmetics, food, agriculture, etc. [1] However, due to the toxicity and infectiousness of <em>P. aeruginosa</em>, other alternative organisms are tested. Currently, genetically engineered <em>Pseudomonas putida</em> has more promising results than others. <em>P. putida</em> only lacks two enzymes for mono-rhamnolipid production: RhlA and RhlB. These enzymes are encoded by <em>rhlA</em> and <em>rhlB</em> coding regions in rhlAB operon. It was previously thought that <em>rhlA</em> and <em>rhlB</em> forms heterodimer, however, further research showed that they act independently from each other [2]. |
− | Our team planned to extract rhLA and rhlB genes from P.aeruginosa and to insert them into pRGPDuo2 plasmid obtained from Gauttam, R. [3] We developed the new approach to increase the P. putida's rhamnolipid synthesis by adding nadE gene which encodes NAD synthetase. This way, we hoped to see more rhamnolipid production in engineered P. putida. | + | Our team planned to extract <em>rhLA</em> and <em>rhlB</em> genes from <em>P.aeruginosa</em> and to insert them into pRGPDuo2 plasmid obtained from Gauttam, R. [3] We developed the new approach to increase the <em>P. putida</em>'s rhamnolipid synthesis by adding <em>nadE</em> gene which encodes NAD synthetase. This way, we hoped to see more rhamnolipid production in engineered <em>P. putida</em>. |
The rhamnosyltransferase B (RhlB) catalyzes the reaction between 3-(3-hydroxyalkanoyloxy)alkanoic acid and dTDP-L-rhamnose which forms mono-rhamnolipid [1]. | The rhamnosyltransferase B (RhlB) catalyzes the reaction between 3-(3-hydroxyalkanoyloxy)alkanoic acid and dTDP-L-rhamnose which forms mono-rhamnolipid [1]. | ||
− | https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/thumb/ | + | https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/thumb/8/86/RhlA_rhlB_pathway1.png/798px-RhlA_rhlB_pathway1.png |
<em><strong>Figure 1.</strong> RhlA and RhlB metabolic pathway</em> | <em><strong>Figure 1.</strong> RhlA and RhlB metabolic pathway</em> | ||
− | |||
===Part functionality=== | ===Part functionality=== | ||
− | We used our assembled rhlB primers to extract the <em> | + | |
+ | <strong>Visualisation</strong> | ||
+ | |||
+ | We used our assembled <em>rhlB</em> primers to extract the <em>rhlB</em> gene. (https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K4083016, https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K4083018). Obtained genes were amplified in a PCR machine. Then, these PCR products were analyzed in the gel electrophoresis experiment: | ||
https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/5/5d/RhlB_emhasized.jpg | https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/5/5d/RhlB_emhasized.jpg | ||
Line 27: | Line 29: | ||
− | It can be observed that rhlB genes were properly extracted as their bands are located below 1.5kbp which is near the actual size of the nadE gene (1334bp). The smears in each well can result from the high concentration of primers, we learned from our mistake and tried to lower the concentration. | + | It can be observed that <em>rhlB</em> genes were properly extracted as their bands are located below 1.5kbp which is near the actual size of the nadE gene (1334bp). The smears in each well can result from the high concentration of primers, we learned from our mistake and tried to lower the concentration. |
− | Next, these gels were eluted, and collected genes were inserted into the pRGPDuo2 plasmid. To incorporate | + | Next, these gels were eluted, and collected genes were inserted into the pRGPDuo2 plasmid. To incorporate <em>rhlB</em> genes, we digested plasmids with NheI, SacI, SalI restrictases, and T4 ligase. These plasmids with incorporated <em>nadE</em> gene were electroporated into <em>Pseudomonas putida</em> and <em>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</em>. Unfortunately, due to the lack of time from the COVID-19 situation and late reagents delivery, we were not able to properly insert our genes into <em>P. putida</em>. However, we managed to cultivate <em>P. aeruginosa</em> in kanamycin in LB agar. Then, we extracted these engineered plasmids, and double digested them by SacI and SalI restrictases: |
https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/1/1d/RhlB%2Bplasmid_emhasized.jpg | https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/1/1d/RhlB%2Bplasmid_emhasized.jpg | ||
Line 36: | Line 38: | ||
− | In this picture, E well contains pRGPDuo2+<em>rhlB</em> which was double digested. The base-pair length corresponds to the actual length of pRGPDuo2 and rhlB. | + | In this picture, E well contains pRGPDuo2+<em>rhlB</em> which was double digested. The base-pair length corresponds to the actual length of pRGPDuo2 and <em>rhlB</em>. |
+ | |||
<strong>Analysis of biosurfactnt</strong> | <strong>Analysis of biosurfactnt</strong> | ||
− | Since P. aeruginosa already has rhlB genes, we planned to check to what extent the rhamnolipid production will be increased. | + | Since <em>P. aeruginosa</em> already has rhlB genes, we planned to check to what extent the rhamnolipid production will be increased. |
https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/thumb/6/64/Oil_samples.png/797px-Oil_samples.png | https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/thumb/6/64/Oil_samples.png/797px-Oil_samples.png | ||
− | <em><strong>Figure 4.</strong> Analysis of emulsification assay results after 24 hours of incubation | + | <em><strong>Figure 4.</strong> Analysis of emulsification assay results after 24 hours of incubation |
− | A: Treatment with P. aeruginosa Wild type crude biosurfactant (from conventional fermentation) | + | A: Treatment with <em>P. aeruginosa</em> Wild type crude biosurfactant (from conventional fermentation) |
B: Untreated control | B: Untreated control | ||
− | C: Treatment with P. aeruginosa nadE crude biosurfactant (electrofermentation) | + | C: Treatment with <em>P. aeruginosa</em> <em>nadE</em> crude biosurfactant (electrofermentation) |
− | D: Treatment with P. aeruginosa rhlA crude biosurfactant (electrofermentation) | + | D: Treatment with <em>P. aeruginosa</em> <em>rhlA</em> crude biosurfactant (electrofermentation) |
− | E: Treatment with P. aeruginosa rhlB crude biosurfactant (electrofermentation) | + | E: Treatment with <em>P. aeruginosa</em> <em>rhlB</em> crude biosurfactant (electrofermentation) |
</em> | </em> | ||
− | <em><strong>Table 1.</strong> Bioremediation treatment of crude oil contaminated soils with crude biosurfactants from the various production set-ups (electrofermentation) using the different P. aeruginosa strains</em> | + | <em><strong>Table 1.</strong> Bioremediation treatment of crude oil contaminated soils with crude biosurfactants from the various production set-ups (electrofermentation) using the different <em>P. aeruginosa</em> strains</em> |
<table class="editorDemoTable"> | <table class="editorDemoTable"> | ||
Line 60: | Line 63: | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td></td> | <td></td> | ||
− | <td><strong>P. aeruginosa Wild Type</strong></td> | + | <td><strong><em>P. aeruginosa</em> Wild Type</strong></td> |
<td><strong>Untreated control </strong></td> | <td><strong>Untreated control </strong></td> | ||
− | <td><strong>P. aeruginosa with pRGPDuo2 + nadE</strong></td> | + | <td><strong><em>P. aeruginosa</em> with pRGPDuo2 + <em>nadE</em></strong></td> |
− | <td><strong>P. aeruginosa with pRGPDuo2 + rhlA</strong></td> | + | <td><strong><em>P. aeruginosa</em> with pRGPDuo2 + <em>rhlA</em></strong></td> |
− | <td><strong>P. aeruginosa with pRGPDuo2 + rhlB</strong></td> | + | <td><strong><em>P. aeruginosa</em> with pRGPDuo2 + <em>rhlB</em></strong></td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
Line 78: | Line 81: | ||
− | The emulsification index was identified using the ImageJ software. The remaining crude oil on top of the media of untreated control was taken as a control. Compared to the given value, the emulsification index was identified for other strains of P. aeruginosa. The emulsification index for wild-type P. aeruginosa (39.53%), P. aeruginosa rhlA (33.52%), and P. aeruginosa rhlB (36.71%) was approximately similar, indicating the fact that P. aeruginosa already contains both nadE and rhl genes and electrochemically active. Furthermore, it indicates that overexpression of any gene would not lead to the consequent increase of rhamnolipid production. | + | The emulsification index was identified using the ImageJ software. The remaining crude oil on top of the media of untreated control was taken as a control. Compared to the given value, the emulsification index was identified for other strains of <em>P. aeruginosa</em>. The emulsification index for wild-type <em>P. aeruginosa</em> (39.53%), <em>P. aeruginosa</em> <em>rhlA</em> (33.52%), and <em>P. aeruginosa rhlB</em> (36.71%) was approximately similar, indicating the fact that <em>P. aeruginosa</em> already contains both <em>nadE</em> and <em>rhl</em> genes and electrochemically active. Furthermore, it indicates that overexpression of any gene would not lead to the consequent increase of rhamnolipid production. |
− | However, as the results have shown, overexpression of the nadE gene increased the emulsification index 1.88 times, from 39.53% to 74.23%. It is possible to conclude that the nadE gene overexpression in P. aeruginosa was able to increase the electron pull of the bacteria and elevate rhamnolipid production. | + | However, as the results have shown, overexpression of the <em>nadE</em> gene increased the emulsification index 1.88 times, from 39.53% to 74.23%. It is possible to conclude that the <em>nadE</em> gene overexpression in <em>P. aeruginosa</em> was able to increase the electron pull of the bacteria and elevate rhamnolipid production. |
===Reference=== | ===Reference=== |
Latest revision as of 00:55, 22 October 2021
rhlB with SacI and SalI sites
The rhlB gene is responsible for the production of rhamnosyltransferase called RhlB in Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Usage and Biology
P. aeruginosa is a gram-negative bacillus and opportunistic pathogen. It secretes rhamnolipids - the rhamnose containing glycolipid biosurfactant. These biosurfactants are used by P. aeruginosa to emulsify the oil substances for easy digestion. Thus, rhamnolipids can increase the availability of fats which can be important in many different areas like petroleum, bioremediation, cosmetics, food, agriculture, etc. [1] However, due to the toxicity and infectiousness of P. aeruginosa, other alternative organisms are tested. Currently, genetically engineered Pseudomonas putida has more promising results than others. P. putida only lacks two enzymes for mono-rhamnolipid production: RhlA and RhlB. These enzymes are encoded by rhlA and rhlB coding regions in rhlAB operon. It was previously thought that rhlA and rhlB forms heterodimer, however, further research showed that they act independently from each other [2].
Our team planned to extract rhLA and rhlB genes from P.aeruginosa and to insert them into pRGPDuo2 plasmid obtained from Gauttam, R. [3] We developed the new approach to increase the P. putida's rhamnolipid synthesis by adding nadE gene which encodes NAD synthetase. This way, we hoped to see more rhamnolipid production in engineered P. putida.
The rhamnosyltransferase B (RhlB) catalyzes the reaction between 3-(3-hydroxyalkanoyloxy)alkanoic acid and dTDP-L-rhamnose which forms mono-rhamnolipid [1].
Figure 1. RhlA and RhlB metabolic pathway
Part functionality
Visualisation
We used our assembled rhlB primers to extract the rhlB gene. (https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K4083016, https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K4083018). Obtained genes were amplified in a PCR machine. Then, these PCR products were analyzed in the gel electrophoresis experiment:
Figure 2. Gel electrophoresis of PCR products.
It can be observed that rhlB genes were properly extracted as their bands are located below 1.5kbp which is near the actual size of the nadE gene (1334bp). The smears in each well can result from the high concentration of primers, we learned from our mistake and tried to lower the concentration.
Next, these gels were eluted, and collected genes were inserted into the pRGPDuo2 plasmid. To incorporate rhlB genes, we digested plasmids with NheI, SacI, SalI restrictases, and T4 ligase. These plasmids with incorporated nadE gene were electroporated into Pseudomonas putida and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Unfortunately, due to the lack of time from the COVID-19 situation and late reagents delivery, we were not able to properly insert our genes into P. putida. However, we managed to cultivate P. aeruginosa in kanamycin in LB agar. Then, we extracted these engineered plasmids, and double digested them by SacI and SalI restrictases:
Figure 3. Gel Electrophoresis of extracted plasmids with genes
In this picture, E well contains pRGPDuo2+rhlB which was double digested. The base-pair length corresponds to the actual length of pRGPDuo2 and rhlB.
Analysis of biosurfactnt
Since P. aeruginosa already has rhlB genes, we planned to check to what extent the rhamnolipid production will be increased.
Figure 4. Analysis of emulsification assay results after 24 hours of incubation
A: Treatment with P. aeruginosa Wild type crude biosurfactant (from conventional fermentation) B: Untreated control C: Treatment with P. aeruginosa nadE crude biosurfactant (electrofermentation) D: Treatment with P. aeruginosa rhlA crude biosurfactant (electrofermentation) E: Treatment with P. aeruginosa rhlB crude biosurfactant (electrofermentation)
Table 1. Bioremediation treatment of crude oil contaminated soils with crude biosurfactants from the various production set-ups (electrofermentation) using the different P. aeruginosa strains
P. aeruginosa Wild Type | Untreated control | P. aeruginosa with pRGPDuo2 + nadE | P. aeruginosa with pRGPDuo2 + rhlA | P. aeruginosa with pRGPDuo2 + rhlB | |
Emulsification index, % | 39.53 | - | 74.23 | 33.52 | 36.71 |
The emulsification index was identified using the ImageJ software. The remaining crude oil on top of the media of untreated control was taken as a control. Compared to the given value, the emulsification index was identified for other strains of P. aeruginosa. The emulsification index for wild-type P. aeruginosa (39.53%), P. aeruginosa rhlA (33.52%), and P. aeruginosa rhlB (36.71%) was approximately similar, indicating the fact that P. aeruginosa already contains both nadE and rhl genes and electrochemically active. Furthermore, it indicates that overexpression of any gene would not lead to the consequent increase of rhamnolipid production.
However, as the results have shown, overexpression of the nadE gene increased the emulsification index 1.88 times, from 39.53% to 74.23%. It is possible to conclude that the nadE gene overexpression in P. aeruginosa was able to increase the electron pull of the bacteria and elevate rhamnolipid production.
Reference
[1] Chong, H., & Li, Q. (2017, August 5). Microbial production of rhamnolipids: opportunities, challenges, and strategies. Microbial Cell Factories. https://microbialcellfactories.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12934-017-0753-2
[2] Wittgens, A., Kovacic, F., Müller, M. M., Gerlitzki, M., Santiago-Schübel, B., Hofmann, D., Tiso, T., Blank, L. M., Henkel, M., Hausmann, R., Syldatk, C., Wilhelm, S., & Rosenau, F. (2016). Novel insights into biosynthesis and uptake of rhamnolipids and their precursors. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 101(7), 2865–2878. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-016-8041-3
[3] Gauttam, R., Mukhopadhyay, A., & Singer, S. W. (2020). Construction of a novel dual-inducible duet-expression system for gene (over)expression in Pseudomonas putida. Plasmid, 110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plasmid.2020.102514
Sequence and Features
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
- 21INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]Illegal XhoI site found at 1172
- 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]Illegal NgoMIV site found at 65
Illegal NgoMIV site found at 786
Illegal NgoMIV site found at 899 - 1000COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]