Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K245114:Experience"

(Functional Test)
Line 29: Line 29:
 
[[File:T--NCTU_Formosa--bacteriatable.png|500px|thumb|center|'''Table 1. Parameters of the sterilization system of LL37
 
[[File:T--NCTU_Formosa--bacteriatable.png|500px|thumb|center|'''Table 1. Parameters of the sterilization system of LL37
 
]]
 
]]
 +
 +
 +
= Feeding Frequency Validation =
 +
 +
[[File:T--NCTU_Formosa--Validation1.png|300px|thumb|center|'''Figure 4. A is the control group, and B is the experiment group
 +
]]
 +
 +
&emsp;&emsp; In order to validate the efficiency optimization model usable in any environment, we use <i>E. coli</i> with pSB1K3, hydrogen peroxide, and glucose to simulate as <i>P. gingivalis</i>, feeding dental bones and eating foods. As a result of the different environments of the experiment and the dog's mouse. We modified the environment reaction function to meet requirements.
 +
 +
[[File:T--NCTU_Formosa--Validation2.png|500px|thumb|center|'''Figure 5. The Validation of Efficiency Optimization Model
 +
]]
 +
 +
&emsp;&emsp; The above figure shows that the prediction value is very close to the experimental data, and the prediction is very accurate and precise by observing the R-square and RMSE.
 +
 +
&emsp;&emsp; After validating the accuracy and precision of the model, we further compare the reward of two dental bone feeding policies. Policy 1 (control group) is feeding dental bone with a fixed time interval. Policy 2 (experimental group) is feeding dental bone with RL prediction results.
 +
 +
[[File:T--NCTU_Formosa--Validation3.png|500px|thumb|center|'''Figure 6. The comparison of Reward from Policy 1 and Policy 2
 +
]]
 +
 +
&emsp;&emsp; Through calculating the reward of policy 1 and policy 2 by reward function, we can claim the reward of policy 2 is statistically higher than policy 1. Simply speaking, through the validation experiment, we successfully proved the optimization ability of this model.
  
 
= Functional Test =
 
= Functional Test =
 
&emsp;&emsp; After finishing the design of DenTeeth, we wanted to know whether its inhibition ability can have a function, so we designed the following experiment.
 
&emsp;&emsp; After finishing the design of DenTeeth, we wanted to know whether its inhibition ability can have a function, so we designed the following experiment.
  
<br>&emsp;&emsp;By taking the method of dish culture and sticking up the filter paper, we dropped the DenTeeth on the filter paper in the center of the <i>E. coli</i>, DH5α with pET32a, plate. After twelve hours, a circular area around the spot of the DenTeeth formed, in which the bacteria colonies did not grow. Inhibition zone proved that the LL-37 produced by DenTeeth could successfully secrete out and inhibit the growth of <i>E. coli</i>, DH5α with pET32a.
+
<br>&emsp;&emsp; By taking the method of dish culture and sticking up the filter paper, we dropped the DenTeeth on the filter paper in the center of the <i>E. coli</i>, DH5α with pET32a, plate. After twelve hours, a circular area around the spot of the DenTeeth formed, in which the bacteria colonies did not grow. Inhibition zone proved that the LL-37 produced by DenTeeth could successfully secrete out and inhibit the growth of <i>E. coli</i>, DH5α with pET32a.
[[File:T--NCTU_Formosa--Zone of inhibition.png|500px|thumb|center|'''Figure 4. DenTeeth inhibition zone result in LB plates. ( The materials added in plate were in the following condition, and each total volume is 20μL. (A) 30% hydrogen peroxide, (B) <i>E. coli</i> (BL21) with pSB1K3, (C) DenTeeth, (D) <i>E. coli</i> (BL21) with pSB1K3 (Cell Lysate), (E) DenTeeth (Cell Lysate), (F) PBS, (G) <i>E. coli</i> (BL21) with pSB1K3 + PBS, (H) DenTeeth + PBS, (I) LB broth (Centrifuging <i>E. coli</i> (BL21) with pSB1K3 after liquid culturing ), (J) LB broth (Centrifuging <i>E. coli</i> (BL21) with pSB1K3 after liquid culturing ) )
+
[[File:T--NCTU_Formosa--Zone of inhibition.png|500px|thumb|center|'''Figure 7. DenTeeth inhibition zone result in LB plates. ( The materials added in plate were in the following condition, and each total volume is 20μL. (A) 30% hydrogen peroxide, (B) <i>E. coli</i> (BL21) with pSB1K3, (C) DenTeeth, (D) <i>E. coli</i> (BL21) with pSB1K3 (Cell Lysate), (E) DenTeeth (Cell Lysate), (F) PBS, (G) <i>E. coli</i> (BL21) with pSB1K3 + PBS, (H) DenTeeth + PBS, (I) LB broth (Centrifuging <i>E. coli</i> (BL21) with pSB1K3 after liquid culturing ), (J) LB broth (Centrifuging <i>E. coli</i> (BL21) with pSB1K3 after liquid culturing ) )
 
]]
 
]]
  
 
&emsp;&emsp; Finally, we chose antimicrobial peptides, LL-37 play the part of bacteria-inhibition. Human cathelicidin-derived LL-37 is a 37-residue cationic, amphipathic α-helical peptide. It is an active component of mammalian innate immunity. LL-37 not only can inhibit P. gingivalis but can also inhibit <i>Escherichia coli</i> itself, preventing DenTeeth from overgrowing after entering the canine mouth.
 
&emsp;&emsp; Finally, we chose antimicrobial peptides, LL-37 play the part of bacteria-inhibition. Human cathelicidin-derived LL-37 is a 37-residue cationic, amphipathic α-helical peptide. It is an active component of mammalian innate immunity. LL-37 not only can inhibit P. gingivalis but can also inhibit <i>Escherichia coli</i> itself, preventing DenTeeth from overgrowing after entering the canine mouth.
  
[[File:T--NCTU_Formosa--Zone of inhibition2.png|500px|thumb|center|'''Figure 5. The Bar Chart of DenTeeth inhibition Functional Test.
+
[[File:T--NCTU_Formosa--Zone of inhibition2.png|500px|thumb|center|'''Figure 8. The Bar Chart of DenTeeth inhibition Functional Test.
 
]]
 
]]
 
|};
 
|};

Revision as of 23:13, 21 October 2021


This experience page is provided so that any user may enter their experience using this part.
Please enter how you used this part and how it worked out.

Applications of BBa_K245114

User Reviews

UNIQ3857d713fc5439c6-partinfo-00000000-QINU

•••••

iGEM NCTU_Formosa(2021)

Gene Construct of DenTeeth

  We incorporate the whole part into E. coli BL21(DE3). We did colony PCR and digest to check its genotype.

Figure 1. Quorum sensing sequence + Restoration sequence + Sterilization sequence. M :1kb DNA ladder, 1 : Constitutive promoter + RBS + LuxR + Term. +Term. + Ptet + RBS + BMP2 + RBS + STATH + RBS + GFP + Term. + Term. + Plux + RBS + LL-37 + RBS + mRFP + RBS + tetR + Term. + Term. (4685 b.p.)</i>

Model

   Through the modeling built with substituting parameters from published articles, the growth of E. coli and P. gingivalis under the effect of LL-37 would be inhibited significantly. However, the figure also shows that E. coli could still live with LL-37. Simply speaking, we successfully test the feasibility of DenTeeth and find that we can improve the DenTeeth with both biobrick design and efficiency optimization model.

Figure 2. The growth curve of E. coli and P. gingivalis
Figure 3. The growth curve of E. coli and P. gingivalis

   Because P. gingivalis was in the RG2, so we could not do the LL-37 functional test by inhibiting the growth of P. gingivalis. After reading some related papers, we found that the killing rate of E. coli was similar to that of P. gingivalis [4]. Based on these data, we determined to make E. coli, DH5α with pET32A, as the bacteria killed by DenTeeth in the LL-37 functional test.

Table 1. Parameters of the sterilization system of LL37


Feeding Frequency Validation

Figure 4. A is the control group, and B is the experiment group

   In order to validate the efficiency optimization model usable in any environment, we use E. coli with pSB1K3, hydrogen peroxide, and glucose to simulate as P. gingivalis, feeding dental bones and eating foods. As a result of the different environments of the experiment and the dog's mouse. We modified the environment reaction function to meet requirements.

Figure 5. The Validation of Efficiency Optimization Model

   The above figure shows that the prediction value is very close to the experimental data, and the prediction is very accurate and precise by observing the R-square and RMSE.

   After validating the accuracy and precision of the model, we further compare the reward of two dental bone feeding policies. Policy 1 (control group) is feeding dental bone with a fixed time interval. Policy 2 (experimental group) is feeding dental bone with RL prediction results.

Figure 6. The comparison of Reward from Policy 1 and Policy 2

   Through calculating the reward of policy 1 and policy 2 by reward function, we can claim the reward of policy 2 is statistically higher than policy 1. Simply speaking, through the validation experiment, we successfully proved the optimization ability of this model.

Functional Test

   After finishing the design of DenTeeth, we wanted to know whether its inhibition ability can have a function, so we designed the following experiment.


   By taking the method of dish culture and sticking up the filter paper, we dropped the DenTeeth on the filter paper in the center of the E. coli, DH5α with pET32a, plate. After twelve hours, a circular area around the spot of the DenTeeth formed, in which the bacteria colonies did not grow. Inhibition zone proved that the LL-37 produced by DenTeeth could successfully secrete out and inhibit the growth of E. coli, DH5α with pET32a.

Figure 7. DenTeeth inhibition zone result in LB plates. ( The materials added in plate were in the following condition, and each total volume is 20μL. (A) 30% hydrogen peroxide, (B) E. coli (BL21) with pSB1K3, (C) DenTeeth, (D) E. coli (BL21) with pSB1K3 (Cell Lysate), (E) DenTeeth (Cell Lysate), (F) PBS, (G) E. coli (BL21) with pSB1K3 + PBS, (H) DenTeeth + PBS, (I) LB broth (Centrifuging E. coli (BL21) with pSB1K3 after liquid culturing ), (J) LB broth (Centrifuging E. coli (BL21) with pSB1K3 after liquid culturing ) )

   Finally, we chose antimicrobial peptides, LL-37 play the part of bacteria-inhibition. Human cathelicidin-derived LL-37 is a 37-residue cationic, amphipathic α-helical peptide. It is an active component of mammalian innate immunity. LL-37 not only can inhibit P. gingivalis but can also inhibit Escherichia coli itself, preventing DenTeeth from overgrowing after entering the canine mouth.

Figure 8. The Bar Chart of DenTeeth inhibition Functional Test.
;

BBa_K245114 NCTU-Formosa(2021) Not understood UNIQ3857d713fc5439c6-partinfo-00000003-QINU