Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K3759000"
(→Usage) |
|||
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
The first approach is constructing the fusion protein which was made to enhance the efficiency of adsorption, since the surface of PET film is hydrophobic and the surface of mLCC is hydrophilic. By constructing the mLCC-linker-mHFBI, mLCC-linker-mHGFI and mLCC-linker-BsLA fusion protein, the PET degradation efficiency will be enhanced due to the unique properties of amphiphilicity and self-assembly of hydrophobins. | The first approach is constructing the fusion protein which was made to enhance the efficiency of adsorption, since the surface of PET film is hydrophobic and the surface of mLCC is hydrophilic. By constructing the mLCC-linker-mHFBI, mLCC-linker-mHGFI and mLCC-linker-BsLA fusion protein, the PET degradation efficiency will be enhanced due to the unique properties of amphiphilicity and self-assembly of hydrophobins. | ||
− | The second approach is using the technique of Bacillus subtilis surface display. By combining mLCC with the coat protein to form CotB-linker-mLCC, CotC-linker-mLCC, CotG-linker-mLCC and CotC-linker-mLCC fusion protein. mLCC will be immobilized on the Bacillus subtilis cell surface to obtain a recyclable whole-cell biocatalyst, which can reduce costs and make the mLCC more efficient degrading PET. | + | The second approach is using the technique of Bacillus subtilis surface display. By combining mLCC with the coat protein to form CotB-linker-mLCC, CotC-linker-mLCC, CotG-linker-mLCC and CotC-linker-mLCC fusion protein. mLCC will be immobilized on the Bacillus subtilis cell surface to obtain a recyclable whole-cell biocatalyst, which can reduce costs and make the mLCC more efficient degrading PET. |
===Biology=== | ===Biology=== | ||
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
1. a 6× His tag is added to enable us carrying out Ni-NTA protein purification | 1. a 6× His tag is added to enable us carrying out Ni-NTA protein purification | ||
− | 2. The CT fused with BslA, mHGFI or mHFBI with a GS linker ( | + | 2. The CT fused with BslA, mHGFI or mHFBI with a GS linker (GGGGSGGGGS) |
Construct Cell surface display of mLCC in Bacillus subtilis: | Construct Cell surface display of mLCC in Bacillus subtilis: | ||
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
The construct was cloned into a pHT43 plasmid and transformed into B.subtilis BS168 The construction includes: | The construct was cloned into a pHT43 plasmid and transformed into B.subtilis BS168 The construction includes: | ||
− | 1. CotB is fused with mLCC at the NT with a GS linker ( | + | 1. CotB is fused with mLCC at the NT with a GS linker (GGGGSGGGGS) |
2. A flag-tag is added at the C-terminal to provide conditions for the use of fluorescence to detect the target protein after it is displayed on the cell surface. | 2. A flag-tag is added at the C-terminal to provide conditions for the use of fluorescence to detect the target protein after it is displayed on the cell surface. | ||
Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
For Molecular cloning, we selected pET28a as vector. We successfully amplified four gene segments of mLCC (as control group), mLCC-linker-mHFBI, mLCC-linker-mHGFI and mLCC-linker-BslA. Then we digested and connected the four segments to pET28a vector through two restriction enzymes of BamHI and XhoI. At present, four recombinant plasmids have been successfully constructed. | For Molecular cloning, we selected pET28a as vector. We successfully amplified four gene segments of mLCC (as control group), mLCC-linker-mHFBI, mLCC-linker-mHGFI and mLCC-linker-BslA. Then we digested and connected the four segments to pET28a vector through two restriction enzymes of BamHI and XhoI. At present, four recombinant plasmids have been successfully constructed. | ||
<p style="text-align: center;"> | <p style="text-align: center;"> | ||
− | [[File:mlcc1.png|400px]]<br> | + | (a)[[File:mlcc1.png|400px]]<br> |
− | [[File:mlcc2.png|500px]]<br> | + | (b)[[File:mlcc2.png|500px]]<br> |
'''Figure 1.''' (a). M: marker; Lane 1: mLCC 780bp; Lane 2: mLCC-linker-mHGFI 1059bp Lane 3: mLCC-linker-mHFBI 1035bp; Lane 4: mLCC-linker-BslA 1227bp<br> | '''Figure 1.''' (a). M: marker; Lane 1: mLCC 780bp; Lane 2: mLCC-linker-mHGFI 1059bp Lane 3: mLCC-linker-mHFBI 1035bp; Lane 4: mLCC-linker-BslA 1227bp<br> | ||
(b). M: marker; Lane 1,2,3,4: mLCC 780bp; Lane 5,6,7: mLCC-linker-mHGFI 1059bp Lane 8,9.10: mLCC-linker-mHFBI 1035bp; Lane 11,12,13: mLCC-linker-BslA 1227bp | (b). M: marker; Lane 1,2,3,4: mLCC 780bp; Lane 5,6,7: mLCC-linker-mHGFI 1059bp Lane 8,9.10: mLCC-linker-mHFBI 1035bp; Lane 11,12,13: mLCC-linker-BslA 1227bp | ||
Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
During cloning we used pHT43 plasmid. We successfully performed PCR amplification of all the four fusion genes. As we continued our lab, recombinant plasmid with CotB was successfully constructed after the double digestion verification (pHT43-cotB-linker-mLCC). However, the other three CotC, CotG, and CotX are still continuing to be tried out. | During cloning we used pHT43 plasmid. We successfully performed PCR amplification of all the four fusion genes. As we continued our lab, recombinant plasmid with CotB was successfully constructed after the double digestion verification (pHT43-cotB-linker-mLCC). However, the other three CotC, CotG, and CotX are still continuing to be tried out. | ||
<p style="text-align: center;"> | <p style="text-align: center;"> | ||
− | [[File:mlcc13.png|500px]]<br> | + | (a)[[File:mlcc13.png|500px]]<br> |
− | [[File:mlcc14.png|400px]]<br> | + | (b)[[File:mlcc14.png|400px]]<br> |
− | [[File:mlcc15.png|300px]]<br> | + | (c)[[File:mlcc15.png|300px]]<br> |
− | + | '''Figure 2.''' (a). M: marker; Lane 1: cotB-linker-mLCC; Lane 2: cotC-linker-mLCC; Lane 3: cotG-linker-mLCC 1426bp Lane 4: cotX-linker-mLCC 1357bp<br> | |
(b). M: marker; Lane 1: cotB-linker-mLCC 1986bp ; Lane 2: pHT43-cotB-linker-mLCC (after construction); <br> | (b). M: marker; Lane 1: cotB-linker-mLCC 1986bp ; Lane 2: pHT43-cotB-linker-mLCC (after construction); <br> | ||
(c). cotB-linker-mLCC transformed into pHT43 plasmid | (c). cotB-linker-mLCC transformed into pHT43 plasmid | ||
Line 67: | Line 67: | ||
We transformed four recombinant plasmids into BL21 expressing strains. For four recombinant strains, we tried three IPTG induction concentrations of 0.5mM, 0.7mM, 1.0mM and three induction times of 16h, 20h and 24h, respectively. We found that the induction concentration of 0.5mM IPTG and the induction time of 20h were the best. | We transformed four recombinant plasmids into BL21 expressing strains. For four recombinant strains, we tried three IPTG induction concentrations of 0.5mM, 0.7mM, 1.0mM and three induction times of 16h, 20h and 24h, respectively. We found that the induction concentration of 0.5mM IPTG and the induction time of 20h were the best. | ||
<p style="text-align: center;"> | <p style="text-align: center;"> | ||
− | [[File:mlcc3.png|300px]]<br> | + | (a)[[File:mlcc3.png|300px]]<br> |
− | [[File:mlcc4.png|300px]]<br> | + | (b)[[File:mlcc4.png|300px]]<br> |
− | [[File:mlcc5.png|300px]]<br> | + | (c)[[File:mlcc5.png|300px]]<br> |
− | [[File:mlcc6.png|300px]]<br> | + | (d)[[File:mlcc6.png|300px]]<br> |
− | + | '''Figure 3.''' (a). pET28a-mLCC transformed into BL21 expressing strains.<br> | |
(b). pET28a-mLCC-linker-mHGFI transformed into BL21 expressing strains.<br> | (b). pET28a-mLCC-linker-mHGFI transformed into BL21 expressing strains.<br> | ||
− | (c). pET28a-mLCC-linker- | + | (c). pET28a-mLCC-linker-BsLA transformed into BL21 expressing strains.<br> |
− | (d). pET28a-mLCC-linker- | + | (d). pET28a-mLCC-linker-mHFBI transformed into BL21 expressing strains.<br> |
</p> | </p> | ||
<p style="text-align: center;"> | <p style="text-align: center;"> | ||
− | [[File:mlcc7.png|400px]]<br> | + | (a)[[File:mlcc7.png|400px]]<br> |
− | [[File:mlcc8.png|400px]]<br> | + | (b)[[File:mlcc8.png|400px]]<br> |
− | [[File:mlcc9.png|400px]]<br> | + | (c)[[File:mlcc9.png|400px]]<br> |
− | + | '''Figure 4.''' (a).Induction time:16h; M: marker; (b).Induction time:20h; M: marker;(c). Induction time: 24h; For all lanes 1-12 in (a), (b), (c):<br> | |
Lane 1,2,3: pET28a-mLCC-mHFBI, induction concentration: 0.5mM, 0.7mM,1.0mM;<br> | Lane 1,2,3: pET28a-mLCC-mHFBI, induction concentration: 0.5mM, 0.7mM,1.0mM;<br> | ||
Lane 4, 5, 6: pET28a-mLCC-mHGFI, induction concentration: 0.5mM, 0.7mM,1.0mM;<br> | Lane 4, 5, 6: pET28a-mLCC-mHGFI, induction concentration: 0.5mM, 0.7mM,1.0mM;<br> | ||
Lane 7, 8, 9: pET28a-mLCC, induction concentration: 0.5mM, 0.7mM,1.0mM;<br> | Lane 7, 8, 9: pET28a-mLCC, induction concentration: 0.5mM, 0.7mM,1.0mM;<br> | ||
Lane 10, 11, 12: pET28a-mLCC-BsIA, induction concentration: 0.5mM, 0.7mM,1.0mM; | Lane 10, 11, 12: pET28a-mLCC-BsIA, induction concentration: 0.5mM, 0.7mM,1.0mM; | ||
+ | </p> | ||
===Protein Purification=== | ===Protein Purification=== | ||
====Create a fusion protein by jointing mLCC with hydrophobins==== | ====Create a fusion protein by jointing mLCC with hydrophobins==== | ||
Because the pET28a vector has His-tag, therefore we used affinity chromatography to purify the supernatant obtained after bacteria clastogenesis using nickel. The result of our proteogels after elution with 200 mm imidazole and 300 mm imidazole is shown below. We successfully purified mLCC and mLCC-linker-BslA. At the same time, we can also see that the two proteins, mLCC-mHGFI, mLCC-mHFBI, are expressed, but the protein expression level is very low. | Because the pET28a vector has His-tag, therefore we used affinity chromatography to purify the supernatant obtained after bacteria clastogenesis using nickel. The result of our proteogels after elution with 200 mm imidazole and 300 mm imidazole is shown below. We successfully purified mLCC and mLCC-linker-BslA. At the same time, we can also see that the two proteins, mLCC-mHGFI, mLCC-mHFBI, are expressed, but the protein expression level is very low. | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[File:mlcc10.png|center|400px]]<br> | ||
<p style="text-align: center;"> | <p style="text-align: center;"> | ||
− | + | '''Figure 5.'''(a). M: marker; <br> | |
+ | Lane 1, 2: mLCC-linker-BslA 43kDa, elution concentration: 200mm Imidazole, 300mm Imidazole;<br> | ||
+ | Lane 3, 4: mLCC 28kDa, elution concentration: 200mm Imidazole, 300mm Imidazole;<br> | ||
+ | Lane 5, 6: mLCC-linker-mHFBI 36kDa, elution concentration: 200mm Imidazole, 300mm Imidazole;<br> | ||
+ | Lane 7, 8: mLCC-linker-mHGFI 36kDa, elution concentration: 200mm Imidazole, 300mm Imidazole; | ||
+ | </p> | ||
===PET Degradation Reaction=== | ===PET Degradation Reaction=== | ||
====Create a fusion protein by jointing mLCC with hydrophobins==== | ====Create a fusion protein by jointing mLCC with hydrophobins==== | ||
We perform PET degradation reaction to detect enzyme activity. We set several protein concentration to detect enzyme activity, under the condition of pH8, 70℃, and 18h of reaction time. Then we measured the absorption value at uv240nm by nanodrop, which is the absorption position of the product TPA, and we were surprised to find that the relative enzyme activity of mLCC-linker-BslA was increased about 3 times compared to mLCC! | We perform PET degradation reaction to detect enzyme activity. We set several protein concentration to detect enzyme activity, under the condition of pH8, 70℃, and 18h of reaction time. Then we measured the absorption value at uv240nm by nanodrop, which is the absorption position of the product TPA, and we were surprised to find that the relative enzyme activity of mLCC-linker-BslA was increased about 3 times compared to mLCC! | ||
+ | |||
<p style="text-align: center;"> | <p style="text-align: center;"> | ||
− | [[File:mlcc11.png|400px]]<br> | + | (a)[[File:mlcc11.png|400px]]<br> |
− | [[File:mlcc12.png|400px]]<br> | + | (b)[[File:mlcc12.png|400px]]<br> |
− | + | '''Figure 6.''' (a). The adsorption value of mLCC, mLCC-Linker-BslA of UV240 under the condition of pH8, 70 celsius degree, reaction time of 18h.<br> | |
− | + | (b) The relativity activity of mLCC, mLCC-Linker-BslA.<br></p> | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
Latest revision as of 02:27, 21 October 2021
mLCC
Sequence and Features
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]Illegal NheI site found at 193
- 21COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
- 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
- 1000COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]
Usage
Our group decide to enhance the activity of mLCC by proceeding two approaches, which are constructing a fusion protein of mLCC and hydrophobins and using the technique of Bacillus subtilis surface display.
The first approach is constructing the fusion protein which was made to enhance the efficiency of adsorption, since the surface of PET film is hydrophobic and the surface of mLCC is hydrophilic. By constructing the mLCC-linker-mHFBI, mLCC-linker-mHGFI and mLCC-linker-BsLA fusion protein, the PET degradation efficiency will be enhanced due to the unique properties of amphiphilicity and self-assembly of hydrophobins.
The second approach is using the technique of Bacillus subtilis surface display. By combining mLCC with the coat protein to form CotB-linker-mLCC, CotC-linker-mLCC, CotG-linker-mLCC and CotC-linker-mLCC fusion protein. mLCC will be immobilized on the Bacillus subtilis cell surface to obtain a recyclable whole-cell biocatalyst, which can reduce costs and make the mLCC more efficient degrading PET.
Biology
LCC is a leaf-branch compost cutinase[1] and a kinetically robust protein[2]. A research published on Nature came up with a mutant enzyme, mLCC[1] that hydrolyzes 90% of PET in plastic bottles in just 10 hours. This is more efficient than any previous PET hydrolase, and more importantly, the resulting monomers- ethylene glycol and terephthalic acid have the same properties as the monomers found in petrochemical materials.
Design Consideration
Create a fusion protein by jointing mLCC with hydrophobins:
The construct was cloned into a pET28a plasmid and transformed into BL21 (DE3) E. coli.
The construction includes:
1. a 6× His tag is added to enable us carrying out Ni-NTA protein purification
2. The CT fused with BslA, mHGFI or mHFBI with a GS linker (GGGGSGGGGS)
Construct Cell surface display of mLCC in Bacillus subtilis:
The construct was cloned into a pHT43 plasmid and transformed into B.subtilis BS168 The construction includes:
1. CotB is fused with mLCC at the NT with a GS linker (GGGGSGGGGS)
2. A flag-tag is added at the C-terminal to provide conditions for the use of fluorescence to detect the target protein after it is displayed on the cell surface.
Molecular Cloning
Create a fusion protein by jointing mLCC with hydrophobins
For Molecular cloning, we selected pET28a as vector. We successfully amplified four gene segments of mLCC (as control group), mLCC-linker-mHFBI, mLCC-linker-mHGFI and mLCC-linker-BslA. Then we digested and connected the four segments to pET28a vector through two restriction enzymes of BamHI and XhoI. At present, four recombinant plasmids have been successfully constructed.
(a)
(b)
Figure 1. (a). M: marker; Lane 1: mLCC 780bp; Lane 2: mLCC-linker-mHGFI 1059bp Lane 3: mLCC-linker-mHFBI 1035bp; Lane 4: mLCC-linker-BslA 1227bp
(b). M: marker; Lane 1,2,3,4: mLCC 780bp; Lane 5,6,7: mLCC-linker-mHGFI 1059bp Lane 8,9.10: mLCC-linker-mHFBI 1035bp; Lane 11,12,13: mLCC-linker-BslA 1227bp
)
Cell surface display of mLCC in B-subtilis
During cloning we used pHT43 plasmid. We successfully performed PCR amplification of all the four fusion genes. As we continued our lab, recombinant plasmid with CotB was successfully constructed after the double digestion verification (pHT43-cotB-linker-mLCC). However, the other three CotC, CotG, and CotX are still continuing to be tried out.
(a)
(b)
(c)
Figure 2. (a). M: marker; Lane 1: cotB-linker-mLCC; Lane 2: cotC-linker-mLCC; Lane 3: cotG-linker-mLCC 1426bp Lane 4: cotX-linker-mLCC 1357bp
(b). M: marker; Lane 1: cotB-linker-mLCC 1986bp ; Lane 2: pHT43-cotB-linker-mLCC (after construction);
(c). cotB-linker-mLCC transformed into pHT43 plasmid
Protein Expression
Create a fusion protein by jointing mLCC with hydrophobins
We transformed four recombinant plasmids into BL21 expressing strains. For four recombinant strains, we tried three IPTG induction concentrations of 0.5mM, 0.7mM, 1.0mM and three induction times of 16h, 20h and 24h, respectively. We found that the induction concentration of 0.5mM IPTG and the induction time of 20h were the best.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Figure 3. (a). pET28a-mLCC transformed into BL21 expressing strains.
(b). pET28a-mLCC-linker-mHGFI transformed into BL21 expressing strains.
(c). pET28a-mLCC-linker-BsLA transformed into BL21 expressing strains.
(d). pET28a-mLCC-linker-mHFBI transformed into BL21 expressing strains.
(a)
(b)
(c)
Figure 4. (a).Induction time:16h; M: marker; (b).Induction time:20h; M: marker;(c). Induction time: 24h; For all lanes 1-12 in (a), (b), (c):
Lane 1,2,3: pET28a-mLCC-mHFBI, induction concentration: 0.5mM, 0.7mM,1.0mM;
Lane 4, 5, 6: pET28a-mLCC-mHGFI, induction concentration: 0.5mM, 0.7mM,1.0mM;
Lane 7, 8, 9: pET28a-mLCC, induction concentration: 0.5mM, 0.7mM,1.0mM;
Lane 10, 11, 12: pET28a-mLCC-BsIA, induction concentration: 0.5mM, 0.7mM,1.0mM;
Protein Purification
Create a fusion protein by jointing mLCC with hydrophobins
Because the pET28a vector has His-tag, therefore we used affinity chromatography to purify the supernatant obtained after bacteria clastogenesis using nickel. The result of our proteogels after elution with 200 mm imidazole and 300 mm imidazole is shown below. We successfully purified mLCC and mLCC-linker-BslA. At the same time, we can also see that the two proteins, mLCC-mHGFI, mLCC-mHFBI, are expressed, but the protein expression level is very low.
Figure 5.(a). M: marker;
Lane 1, 2: mLCC-linker-BslA 43kDa, elution concentration: 200mm Imidazole, 300mm Imidazole;
Lane 3, 4: mLCC 28kDa, elution concentration: 200mm Imidazole, 300mm Imidazole;
Lane 5, 6: mLCC-linker-mHFBI 36kDa, elution concentration: 200mm Imidazole, 300mm Imidazole;
Lane 7, 8: mLCC-linker-mHGFI 36kDa, elution concentration: 200mm Imidazole, 300mm Imidazole;
PET Degradation Reaction
Create a fusion protein by jointing mLCC with hydrophobins
We perform PET degradation reaction to detect enzyme activity. We set several protein concentration to detect enzyme activity, under the condition of pH8, 70℃, and 18h of reaction time. Then we measured the absorption value at uv240nm by nanodrop, which is the absorption position of the product TPA, and we were surprised to find that the relative enzyme activity of mLCC-linker-BslA was increased about 3 times compared to mLCC!
(a)
(b)
Figure 6. (a). The adsorption value of mLCC, mLCC-Linker-BslA of UV240 under the condition of pH8, 70 celsius degree, reaction time of 18h.
(b) The relativity activity of mLCC, mLCC-Linker-BslA.
References
[1] Tournier, V. , Topham, C. M. , Gilles, A. , David, B. , & Marty, A. . (2020). An engineered pet depolymerase to break down and recycle plastic bottles. Nature, 580(7802), 216-219.
[2] Sulaiman S , You D J , Kanaya E , et al. Crystal Structure and Thermodynamic and Kinetic Stability of Metagenome-Derived LC-Cutinase[J]. Biochemistry, 2014, 53(11):1858-1869.