Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K4035006"
Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
[[File:BBa_K4035001-immuno_image_3bis.jpg|400px|thumb|right|'''Figure 2c''' : EBY100, negative control]] | [[File:BBa_K4035001-immuno_image_3bis.jpg|400px|thumb|right|'''Figure 2c''' : EBY100, negative control]] | ||
[[File:BBa_K4035001-immuno_image_4.jpg|400px|thumb|left|'''Figure 2d''' : V5 tag membrane expression in the yeast S.cerevisiae]] | [[File:BBa_K4035001-immuno_image_4.jpg|400px|thumb|left|'''Figure 2d''' : V5 tag membrane expression in the yeast S.cerevisiae]] | ||
− | |||
− | |||
Revision as of 19:01, 20 October 2021
Dimerization of the copper metallothionein 1 : CUP1-(EAAAK)4-CUP1
This protein is made of two copies of the yeast copper metallothionein protein, CUP1 (BBa_M45090), linked together by a rigid linker made of four times the EAAAK amino acid sequence.
Usage and Biology
Copper metallothionein CUP1 (BBa_M45090) is a protein responsible for copper binding in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In order to increase the copper retrieval efficiency, two copies of CUP1 have been linked together by the (EAAAK)4 aa sequence. EAAAK is a common rigid linker and was inserted 4 times in order to allow distance and prevent interaction between the two copies of CUP1. This fusion protein was expressed on the outer membrane of S. cerevisiae by insertion of this part sequence into the pCTcon2V5 (1) plasmid. The expression system (BBa_K4035013) consists of fusing the dimer on a yeast surface display (1) under the control of the Gal1 promoter. This results in the production of a fusion protein Aga2-CUP1-(EAAAK)4-CUP1-V5.
Sequence and Features
- 10INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]Illegal PstI site found at 408
- 12INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]Illegal PstI site found at 408
- 21COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
- 23INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]Illegal PstI site found at 408
- 25INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]Illegal PstI site found at 408
- 1000COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]
Characterization
Expression of the protein in S.cerevisiae
Western Blot Analysis
In order to characterize the protein expression, two experiments were performed, the first being a Western Blot analysis. After having transformed the EBY100 yeast with our newly formed plasmid pCTcon2V5-CUP1-(EAAAK)4-CUP1-V5, we analyzed its protein expression. For control we also tested the wild type yeast (untransformed) as well as a transformed yeast with the plasmid backbone (without insert) in SGCAA, a medium containing galactose allowing for protein expression through the activation of the Gal1 promoter. As the plasmid contains a Gal1 promoter, the system can only be expressed in the presence of galactose.
Figure 1 : The first lane (E2) is the yeast transformed with our plasmid containing the CUP1 dimer and the second and third lanes are, respectively, plasmid backbone and wild type yeast. EBY100 is the wild type yeast and serves as a negative control whereas pCTcon2V5 is the transformed yeast with only the plasmid backbone and serves as a positive control.
Wild type yeast shows no presence of the V5 tag, as expected, while plasmid backbone has signal which proves that our system is expressed in the transformed yeast when induced with galactose. Our transformed yeast with the Aga2-CUP1-(EAAAK)4-CUP1-V5 protein also shows expression of the system.
We can see that we have two bands on the gel, one is approximately 30 kDa which is the size of the fusion protein Aga2-CUP1-(EAAAK)4-CUP1-V5 and the other is slightly smaller. The smaller band could be a truncated version of the protein since we identified a second in-frame start codon in the DNA sequence.
The presence of our CUP1 dimer in our yeast transformants is thus shown.
Immunocytochemistry Assay
To show that the fusion protein is expressed at the membrane of the cell we performed an Immunocytochemistry assay. The cells were incubated with a primary mouse anti-V5 antibody as well as with a secondary goat anti-mouse couple with Alexa Fluor 488. The same strains for control have been used namely, plasmid backbone induced (Figure 2c) and wild type yeast (Figure 2d).
The nuclei have been stained with DAPI and are depicted in blue on the figures. The green disks are representing the transformed yeast cells expressing the CUP1 dimer at their surface (Figure 2a).
Due to the more intense circle we can clearly see that our system is expressed on the membrane of the protein (better seen on Figure 2b which is a higher magnification picture of yeast transformed with a single copy of CUP1, part BBa_K4035001).
We can also remark that not all the cells are expressing the system. This is because the expression is not 100% efficient, concordant to the published expression system (1).
On the negative control, the little green signal we see is background noise or nonspecific antibody binding.
Growth and Survival Characterization
Growth curves of the different yeast strains
In order to check if our expression system would affect the growth of our micro-organism, we performed multiple growth curves with different parameters.
Colony forming assays of the different yeast strains
A second experiment was done to check if the expression system would affect the growth of the yeast cells, a colony forming assay. That experiment consisted of counting the colonies formed by the different yeast strains, respectively wild type, backbone uninduced, backbone induced and transformant, on agar plates.
Copper absorption assays
To finally test our system we imagined an experiment to measure how much copper our transformed yeast could absorb.