Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K2680550"

Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
__NOTOC__
 
__NOTOC__
+
+
 
<partinfo>BBa_K2680550 short</partinfo>
 
<partinfo>BBa_K2680550 short</partinfo>
 
   
 
   
 
 
 
de-GFP ssra is a destabilized GFP created by "fusing amino acids 422–461 of the degradation domain of mouse ornithine decarboxylase (MODC) to the C-terminal end of an enhanced variant of GFP (EGFP) <sup>1</sup> This destabilized GFP is fitted with an ssrA degradation tag.  
 
de-GFP ssra is a destabilized GFP created by "fusing amino acids 422–461 of the degradation domain of mouse ornithine decarboxylase (MODC) to the C-terminal end of an enhanced variant of GFP (EGFP) <sup>1</sup> This destabilized GFP is fitted with an ssrA degradation tag.  
+
 
+
+
 
===References===
 
===References===
 
 
 
 
 
1. Li‡, X., Zhao, X., Fang, Y., Jiang, X., Duong, T., & Huang, C. F. (1998, December 25). Xianqiang Li. Retrieved from http://www.jbc.org/content/273/52/34970.full.html
 
1. Li‡, X., Zhao, X., Fang, Y., Jiang, X., Duong, T., & Huang, C. F. (1998, December 25). Xianqiang Li. Retrieved from http://www.jbc.org/content/273/52/34970.full.html
 
 
 
 
+
+
 
<!-- Add more about the biology of this part here
 
<!-- Add more about the biology of this part here
+
+
 
===Usage and Biology===
 
===Usage and Biology===
 
   
 
   
  
<!-- -->
+
<!-- -->
+
 
<span class='h3bb'>Sequence and Features</span>
 
<span class='h3bb'>Sequence and Features</span>
 
   
 
   
+
 
<partinfo>BBa_K2680550 SequenceAndFeatures</partinfo>
 
<partinfo>BBa_K2680550 SequenceAndFeatures</partinfo>
  

Revision as of 14:24, 10 October 2021



deGFP-ssra


de-GFP ssra is a destabilized GFP created by "fusing amino acids 422–461 of the degradation domain of mouse ornithine decarboxylase (MODC) to the C-terminal end of an enhanced variant of GFP (EGFP) 1 This destabilized GFP is fitted with an ssrA degradation tag.

References

1. Li‡, X., Zhao, X., Fang, Y., Jiang, X., Duong, T., & Huang, C. F. (1998, December 25). Xianqiang Li. Retrieved from http://www.jbc.org/content/273/52/34970.full.html


Sequence and Features



Assembly Compatibility:
  • 10
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
  • 12
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
  • 21
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
  • 23
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
  • 25
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
  • 1000
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]
    Illegal BsaI site found at 47
    Illegal BsaI.rc site found at 771

Contribution by Team ZJUT-China 2021

Group: Team ZJUT-China 2021
Author: Lianjie Sha and Xia Yao
Summary: According to the lectures, we learned that the degradation rate of eGFP-ssrA could be measured. In cell-free system, protein degradation by clpXP is described by a zeroth order chemical kinetic,and clpxp protein can recognize the protein with ssrA tag, so it is useful to add clpxp degrading the degfp. This year,on the basis work of iGEM18_William_and_Mary, ZJUT-China measured the different eGFP degradation rate by adding different concentrate of plasmid P70-clpxp (Part:BBa_K3885203) based on the reference. We hope it will support more help on modelling and further experiments.

Methodology

There are two methods to express clpxp protein: co-expression and pre-expression.Accelerated protein degradation can be achieved by co-expression of P70a-ClpXP, by adding protein to a cell-free system pre-incubated with P70a-ClpXP for an hour or by adding dilutions of pre-expressed clpXP (P70a-clpXP, 3nM). Different methods can provide different rates of protein degradation, ranging from 9.3 nM/min to 250 nM/min. By expressing clpXP, protein synthesis can be adjusted to an appropriate rate.[1]

Results

Group1: Pre-expression for an hour

ClpXP [nM] eGFP degradation rate [nM/min]
0 6.51±1.25
0.2 28.04±3.87
0.4 48.24±8.06
1 88.32±17.71
2 159.13±21.92
6 256.07±38.24
Group2:Co-expression
ClpXP [nM] eGFP degradation rate [nM/min]
0 9.3
0.2 29.4
0.4 47.3
1 80.1
2 128.9
6 128.4

Degradation rate of deGFP upon different expression methods of clpXP. The degradation rate of deGFP-ssra only using the endogenous clpXP has been determined by an assay, which is achieved by measuring the kinetics after adding pure His-GFP-ssrA (5μM) to the cell-free system.

Analysis

As shown in the figure above, the higher the concentration of CLPXP, the faster the degradation of eGFP-ssrA. Meanwhile, according to the table, when ClpXP with the same concentration was added, eGFP degradation rate in pre-expression was from 6.5 nM/min to 256 nM/min, while in co-expression, eGFP degradation rate was from 9.3 nM/min to 128 nM/min. It can be concluded that pre-expression is more conducive to eGFP protein degradation than co-expression.

Reference

[1] Garamella J, Marshall R, Rustad M, et al. The all E. coli TX-TL toolbox 2.0: a platform for cell-free synthetic biology[J]. ACS synthetic biology, 2016, 5(4): 344-355.