Latest revision as of 03:05, 28 October 2020

bcsC-part of Bacterial Cellulose operon for Flavobacteriia

This part codes for the BscC protein, a protein necessary for in vivo cellulose synthesis in Bacteria. It is codon optimised for Flavobacterium johnsoniae UW101

Description

The exact function of BcsC still remains undetermined, but it has been suggested that it is responsible for the creation of pores in the membrane. This CDS originates from a very productive cellulose synthesising bacterium, Komagataeibacter xylinus (GenBank Acc. No. X54676.1). It is the catalytically active subunit of the bacterial Cellulose Synthetase.

Protein Analysis

BcsC is a periplasmic protein that consists of an N-terminal α-helical part formed by several tetratricopeptide repeat (TPR) domains and a C-terminal part that is structurally similar to the β-barrels of outer membrane proteins. The TPR-containing N-terminal part of BcsC is believed to interact with peptidoglycan and other BSC components, while its C-terminal β-barrel domain is likely located in the outer membrane, forming a channel that guides the nascent glucan out of the cell.

The Bacterial Bcs Operon

The putative operon consists of four genes, bcsA, bcsB, bcsC and bcsD. It encodes membrane-associated proteins can catalyse extracellular Bacterial Cellulose synthesis in vivo. Once the bcsABCD operon expression is triggered, BcsA and BcsB proteins form the BcsAB complex, which binds its substrate, UDP-glucose, at an intracellular glycosyltransferase (GT) domain. This complec is the active core of the cellulose synthase. This is followed by the secretion of BC fibres through pores and passageways formed by BcsC and BcsD proteins. Co expression with Cmcax and CcpAx have shown increased production. The cellulose synthase, BcsC, BcsD, Cmcax, and CcpAx are the biocatalysts of UDP-glucose transformation to cellulose. Two main applications of cellulose in biosciences are scaffolds for tissue engineering and generally in biomedicine.

Athens 2020

The current part is designed by iGEM Athens 2020 team during the project MORPHÆ. In this project, Flavobacteria were used to produce a non-cellular structurally coloured biomaterial which would require the secretion of a biomolecule that Flavobacteria do not normally secrete. Our hypothesis is that the formed matrix will have a structure similar to that of the biofilm and thus, it will provide the material with macroscopically the same colouration properties as the biofilm.

SOURCE OF THIS PART

The nucleotide sequences of the bacterial cellulose operon come from the strain Komagataeibacter xylinus and GenBank database (Acc.No.X54676.1). K.xylinus is a member of the acetic acid bacteria, a group of Gram-negative aerobic bacteria that produce acetic acid during fermentation.

Useful Links:

NCBI taxonomy:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Taxonomy/Browser/wwwtax.cgi?mode=Info&id=28448&lvl=3&lin=f&keep=1&srchmode=1&unlock

GenBank link:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/X54676.1

Codon optimisation bank:

http://genomes.urv.es/OPTIMIZER/?fbclid=IwAR0ALbP_C8UVY4itvYdNX8b5KYYUM5ulQojz8UJAK6Zj5llobNNxE-jYmXQ

Codon optimization table:

https://www.kazusa.or.jp/codon/cgi-bin/showcodon.cgi?species=376686&fbclid=IwAR0gwwrIarZsiYhWvHPc2BKy-iB_2OM-DPB5I2HYJZwBNiasmlLXWK87PwM

REFERENCES

Braun, T., Khubbar, M., Saffarini, D., & McBride, M. (2005). Flavobacterium johnsoniae Gliding Motility Genes Identified by mariner Mutagenesis. Journal Of Bacteriology, 187(20), 6943-6952. doi: 10.1128/jb.187.20.6943-6952.2005

Buldum, G., Bismarck, A., & Mantalaris, A. (2017). Recombinant biosynthesis of bacterial cellulose in genetically modified Escherichia coli. Bioprocess And Biosystems Engineering, 41(2), 265-279. doi: 10.1007/s00449-017-1864-1

Johansen, V., Catón, L., Hamidjaja, R., Oosterink, E., Wilts, B., & Rasmussen, T. et al. (2018). Genetic manipulation of structural color in bacterial colonies. Proceedings Of The National Academy Of Sciences, 115(11), 2652-2657. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1716214115

McBride, M., & Kempf, M. (1996). Development of techniques for the genetic manipulation of the gliding bacterium Cytophaga johnsonae. Journal Of Bacteriology, 178(3), 583-590. doi: 10.1128/jb.178.3.583-590.1996

Nakamura, Y. (2000). Codon usage tabulated from international DNA sequence databases: status for the year 2000. Nucleic Acids Research, 28(1), 292-292. doi: 10.1093/nar/28.1.292

Omadjela, O., Narahari, A., Strumillo, J., Melida, H., Mazur, O., Bulone, V., & Zimmer, J. (2013). BcsA and BcsB form the catalytically active core of bacterial cellulose synthase sufficient for in vitro cellulose synthesis. Proceedings Of The National Academy Of Sciences, 110(44), 17856-17861. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1314063110

Römling, U., & Galperin, M. (2015). Bacterial cellulose biosynthesis: diversity of operons, subunits, products, and functions. Trends In Microbiology, 23(9), 545-557. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2015.05.005