Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K3329066"
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<partinfo>BBa_K3329066 short</partinfo> | <partinfo>BBa_K3329066 short</partinfo> | ||
− | + | The superfolder GFP protein is connected with scl2. The green color indicates whether the scl2 is bound to cellulose by seeing whether that filter paper turned green. | |
+ | |||
+ | It's noteworthy that sfGFP would be expressed in both P. Pastoris and E. coli, respectively. Therefore, codon optimization must be applied in order to avoid homologous recombination and fit the chassis organism. As a result, we synthesized 4 versions of genes coding the same sfGFP sequence based on the 2 versions of codon optimization for P. Pastoris and 2 versions for the codon optimization of E. coli. Names for those 4 versions of CDS are documented from sfGFP optimized V1 to CBM optimized V4, in which the sfGFP optimized V1 and V2 are for P. Pastoris, and sfGFP optimized V3-4 are for E. coli. | ||
<!-- Add more about the biology of this part here | <!-- Add more about the biology of this part here |
Latest revision as of 09:17, 27 October 2020
superfolder GFP optimized V4
The superfolder GFP protein is connected with scl2. The green color indicates whether the scl2 is bound to cellulose by seeing whether that filter paper turned green.
It's noteworthy that sfGFP would be expressed in both P. Pastoris and E. coli, respectively. Therefore, codon optimization must be applied in order to avoid homologous recombination and fit the chassis organism. As a result, we synthesized 4 versions of genes coding the same sfGFP sequence based on the 2 versions of codon optimization for P. Pastoris and 2 versions for the codon optimization of E. coli. Names for those 4 versions of CDS are documented from sfGFP optimized V1 to CBM optimized V4, in which the sfGFP optimized V1 and V2 are for P. Pastoris, and sfGFP optimized V3-4 are for E. coli.
Sequence and Features
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
- 21INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]Illegal BamHI site found at 83
- 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]Illegal AgeI site found at 562
- 1000COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]