Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K3352005"

Line 3: Line 3:
 
<partinfo>BBa_K3352005 short</partinfo>
 
<partinfo>BBa_K3352005 short</partinfo>
  
<h3> Construct Design </h3>  
+
<b><font size="+1.2"> Construct Design </font></b>
  
This construct was created to express &#934;29 DNA Polymerase. Sequences used for the promoter, RBS, and terminator came from parts included in the iGEM Registry. This construct consists of a strong promoter and a strong RBS combination (BBKa_K880005), &#934;29 DNA Polymerase, and a downstream double terminator (BBa_BB0015).  
+
We attached a 6x His-tag upstream of the Φ29 DNA polymerase for purification purposes followed by a GS linker to allow flexibility between tag and Φ29. We then flanked the open reading frame with upstream strong promoter and strong ribosome binding site (RBS) combination (BBa_K880005) and downstream double terminator (BBa_B0015). This entire composite part was gene synthesized by IDT.  
  
<h3> Characterization </h3>  
+
https://2020.igem.org/wiki/images/thumb/d/db/T--TAS_Taipei--Parts_BBa_K3352001.png/800px-T--TAS_Taipei--Parts_BBa_K3352001.png
 +
 
 +
<b> Figure 1: Φ29 DNA polymerase with His-Tag and GS linker </b>
 +
 
 +
 
 +
<b><font size="+1.2"> Results </font></b>
 +
 
 +
https://2020.igem.org/wiki/images/4/4e/T--TAS_Taipei--Registry_1.png
 +
 
 +
<b> Figure 2: Characterization of our Φ29 polymerase, parts BBa_K3352004 and BBa_K3352005, and SplintR ligase, BBa_K3352006 and BBa_K3352007. All four constructs were ordered from Twist or IDT, conformed to a biobrick assembly standard 10, and digested with EcoRI and PstI. Parts BBa_K3352004 and BBa_K3352005 were ordered from IDT and had a kanamycin backbone (pUCIDT KAN), which had a size of 2.7kB. BBa_K3352007 was also ordered from IDT, however, it contained an ampicillin backbone (pUCIDT AMP), which is also around 2.7kB. BBa_K3352006 was obtained from Twist Bioscience and was cloned into the ampicillin backbone (pSB1A3). </b>
 +
 
 +
 
 +
<b><font size="+1.2"> Characterization </font></b>
 +
 
 +
 
 +
<b><font size="+0.5"> Protein Expression and Purification of Φ29 DNA polymerase </font></b>
 +
 
 +
We transformed our designed plasmids (BBa_K3352005) into DH5⍺ <i>E. coli</i> cells. We grew overnight cultures, diluted those cultures, and grew the cells to log phase. We lysed cells with xTractor Lysis Buffer (Takara Bio) and purified our His-tagged proteins using Ni sepharose affinity chromatography [2]. In order to check if our proteins were correct, we used SDS-PAGE.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
Based on our results, our SplintR ligase and Φ29 polymerase constructs that used a strong promoter and strong RBS combination (BBa_K3352004 and BBa_K3352005) did not express an appreciable amount of protein (Figure 3).
 +
 
 +
https://2020.igem.org/wiki/images/c/cf/T--TAS_Taipei--Registry_10.png
 +
 
 +
<b>Figure 3: SDS-PAGE results show protein content at different steps of protein purification. A band around 68 kDa in the cell lysate (blue) and the eluate (red), matches our expected His-tagged Φ29. However, many other proteins were present in the eluate and in the flowthrough lane (yellow). This prompted us to redesign our constructs. </b>
 +
 
 +
 
 +
<b><font size="+1.2"> References </font></b>
 +
 
 +
1. Biolabs, N. E. (n.d.-b). Phi29 DNA Polymerase | NEB. Retrieved October 20, 2020, from https://international.neb.com/products/m0269-phi29-dna-polymerase
 +
 
 +
2. XTractorTM Buffer & xTractor Buffer Kit User Manual. (n.d.). 10.
  
We used SDS-PAGE to check for &#934;29 DNA Polymerase expression in E. coli. We prepared overnight DH5&#9082; E. coli cultures and obtained OD600 readings to dilute cultures to standardized populations. We grew the cultures to log phase, and lysed cells with xTractor Lysis Buffer (Takara Bio). We purified our His-tagged proteins using Ni sepharose affinity chromatography, then ran our prepared samples through a nickel column in order to purify out our his-tagged proteins. However, the SDS-PAGE results showed that our &#934;29 DNA Polymerase did not express as strongly as we expected, which prompted us to redesign our constructs.
 
  
 
<!-- Add more about the biology of this part here
 
<!-- Add more about the biology of this part here

Revision as of 13:10, 25 October 2020


Strong Promoter and RBS phi29 DNA Polymerase Ligase Expressing Construct

Construct Design

We attached a 6x His-tag upstream of the Φ29 DNA polymerase for purification purposes followed by a GS linker to allow flexibility between tag and Φ29. We then flanked the open reading frame with upstream strong promoter and strong ribosome binding site (RBS) combination (BBa_K880005) and downstream double terminator (BBa_B0015). This entire composite part was gene synthesized by IDT.

800px-T--TAS_Taipei--Parts_BBa_K3352001.png

Figure 1: Φ29 DNA polymerase with His-Tag and GS linker


Results

T--TAS_Taipei--Registry_1.png

Figure 2: Characterization of our Φ29 polymerase, parts BBa_K3352004 and BBa_K3352005, and SplintR ligase, BBa_K3352006 and BBa_K3352007. All four constructs were ordered from Twist or IDT, conformed to a biobrick assembly standard 10, and digested with EcoRI and PstI. Parts BBa_K3352004 and BBa_K3352005 were ordered from IDT and had a kanamycin backbone (pUCIDT KAN), which had a size of 2.7kB. BBa_K3352007 was also ordered from IDT, however, it contained an ampicillin backbone (pUCIDT AMP), which is also around 2.7kB. BBa_K3352006 was obtained from Twist Bioscience and was cloned into the ampicillin backbone (pSB1A3).


Characterization


Protein Expression and Purification of Φ29 DNA polymerase

We transformed our designed plasmids (BBa_K3352005) into DH5⍺ E. coli cells. We grew overnight cultures, diluted those cultures, and grew the cells to log phase. We lysed cells with xTractor Lysis Buffer (Takara Bio) and purified our His-tagged proteins using Ni sepharose affinity chromatography [2]. In order to check if our proteins were correct, we used SDS-PAGE.


Based on our results, our SplintR ligase and Φ29 polymerase constructs that used a strong promoter and strong RBS combination (BBa_K3352004 and BBa_K3352005) did not express an appreciable amount of protein (Figure 3).

T--TAS_Taipei--Registry_10.png

Figure 3: SDS-PAGE results show protein content at different steps of protein purification. A band around 68 kDa in the cell lysate (blue) and the eluate (red), matches our expected His-tagged Φ29. However, many other proteins were present in the eluate and in the flowthrough lane (yellow). This prompted us to redesign our constructs.


References

1. Biolabs, N. E. (n.d.-b). Phi29 DNA Polymerase | NEB. Retrieved October 20, 2020, from https://international.neb.com/products/m0269-phi29-dna-polymerase

2. XTractorTM Buffer & xTractor Buffer Kit User Manual. (n.d.). 10.


Sequence and Features


Assembly Compatibility:
  • 10
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
  • 12
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
    Illegal NheI site found at 7
    Illegal NheI site found at 30
  • 21
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
  • 23
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
  • 25
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
  • 1000
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]
    Illegal BsaI site found at 656
    Illegal SapI.rc site found at 1054