Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K3504009"
Ahmed Wael (Talk | contribs) (→Improvements) |
Ahmed Wael (Talk | contribs) (→Characterization) |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
==Characterization== | ==Characterization== | ||
+ | |||
[[Image:MutationChar1.PNG|thumb|left|Figure 1.in vitro replicon enhancement method: Using transfected Jurkat cells with replicon RNA which was encoded for mCherry and grown in cell culture under the SGP. Then during serial passage as shown in the flow cytometry histograms, the top 20 percent of mCherry were sorted around every 10 days. this has resulted that cells expressing higher levels of repoter gene were enriched. finally the 5th sort cells were seperated from the rest for replicon sequencing.]] | [[Image:MutationChar1.PNG|thumb|left|Figure 1.in vitro replicon enhancement method: Using transfected Jurkat cells with replicon RNA which was encoded for mCherry and grown in cell culture under the SGP. Then during serial passage as shown in the flow cytometry histograms, the top 20 percent of mCherry were sorted around every 10 days. this has resulted that cells expressing higher levels of repoter gene were enriched. finally the 5th sort cells were seperated from the rest for replicon sequencing.]] | ||
[[Image:MutationChar2.PNG|thumb|right|Figure 2.Mutation identification:Positive mCherry cells was reverse transcribed to cDNA,after that Nsp1 to 4 and the SGP were magnified by seven pairs of primers and amplicons and later on engineered into DNA of the plasmid and changed into E.coli to be amplified. The lower left part schematic illustrates roughly the locations of point mutations in the 5th sort in NSP2 & NSP3.]] | [[Image:MutationChar2.PNG|thumb|right|Figure 2.Mutation identification:Positive mCherry cells was reverse transcribed to cDNA,after that Nsp1 to 4 and the SGP were magnified by seven pairs of primers and amplicons and later on engineered into DNA of the plasmid and changed into E.coli to be amplified. The lower left part schematic illustrates roughly the locations of point mutations in the 5th sort in NSP2 & NSP3.]] | ||
− | <br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /> | + | <br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /> |
+ | We have made simulations using mathematical modelling techniques to characterize the increase in expression when using replicons over traditional methods while also providing simulations that Characterize the function of replicon by eliciting an increased response in both Dendritic Cell population and T-Helper Population.<br /><br /> | ||
+ | We also provide Functional characterization of replicons from literature. As This figure shows HIVA-specific T-cell responses after a single immunization with clinical-grade plasmid DNA vaccines between DREP.HIVA and pTHr.HIVA in individual mice immunized by 10 μg of them all of which complies with our mathematical modelling & simulations | ||
+ | [[Image:Replicon_F_Char.png|thumb|left|Figure 3. Functional characterization of replicons from literature. This figure shows HIVA-specific T-cell responses after a single immunization with clinical-grade plasmid DNA vaccines between DREP.HIVA and pTHr.HIVA in individual mice immunized by 10 μg of them.]] | ||
+ | [[Image:Replicon_Char.png|thumb|right|Figure 4. Mathematical modelling simulation of Number of positive strand RNA in traditional vaccination presented by the graph to the left vs with the use of self amplifying replicon on the right.]] | ||
+ | [[Image:Th_Response.png|thumb|right|Figure 5. Mathematical modelling simulation of T-helper cells population response according to logfc in response to DREP vaccine on the left vs traditional DNA vaccine on the right.]] | ||
+ | [[Image:DC_Response.png|thumb|right|Figure 6. Mathematical modelling simulation of Dendritic Cells population response according to logfc in response to DREP vaccine on the left vs traditional DNA vaccine on the right.]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | <br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /> | ||
==Improvements== | ==Improvements== |
Revision as of 06:19, 23 October 2020
Alphavirus replicon NSPs- Equine Encephalitis virus
Part Description
A composite of parts (BBa_K3504000,BBa_K3504001,BBa_K3504002,BBa_K3504003) and CMV promoter which form ,as a unit, the main constituent of alphavirus replicon which as a whole can give the circuit self-replicating ability
Usage
Alphavirus genomes encode four non-basic proteins, nsP1–4, which are translated from the genomic RNA and interact with host factors to form replicative enzyme complexes. These non-structural proteins are translated as a polyprotein that self-cleaves into separate proteins, which assemble into a replicase complex. The replicase then directs replication and amplification of our vaccine inside the Myocytes.
Characterization
We have made simulations using mathematical modelling techniques to characterize the increase in expression when using replicons over traditional methods while also providing simulations that Characterize the function of replicon by eliciting an increased response in both Dendritic Cell population and T-Helper Population.
We also provide Functional characterization of replicons from literature. As This figure shows HIVA-specific T-cell responses after a single immunization with clinical-grade plasmid DNA vaccines between DREP.HIVA and pTHr.HIVA in individual mice immunized by 10 μg of them all of which complies with our mathematical modelling & simulations
Improvements
Using information in literature we were able to increase the replicon cloning and functional ability by adding G110G, G763R Mutation to NSP2 and adding K94E, S243G,E255D,V305M Mutation to NSP3
References
Maruggi, Giulietta, et al. “Engineered Alphavirus Replicon Vaccines Based on Known Attenuated Viral Mutants Show Limited Effects on Immunogenicity.” Virology, vol. 447, no. 1–2, Dec. 2013, pp. 254–264, 10.1016/j.virol.2013.07.021. Accessed 25 Sept. 2020.
Li, Y., Teague, B., Zhang, Y., Su, Z., Porter, E., Dobosh, B., ... & Weiss, R. (2019). In vitro evolution of enhanced RNA replicons for immunotherapy. Scientific reports, 9(1), 1-10.
Sequence and Features
- 10INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]Illegal EcoRI site found at 2760
Illegal SpeI site found at 2708
Illegal PstI site found at 5089 - 12INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]Illegal EcoRI site found at 2760
Illegal NheI site found at 5960
Illegal NheI site found at 7290
Illegal NheI site found at 8107
Illegal SpeI site found at 2708
Illegal PstI site found at 5089 - 21INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]Illegal EcoRI site found at 2760
Illegal BglII site found at 2882
Illegal BamHI site found at 2744
Illegal BamHI site found at 3107
Illegal XhoI site found at 6124
Illegal XhoI site found at 6185
Illegal XhoI site found at 6226 - 23INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]Illegal EcoRI site found at 2760
Illegal SpeI site found at 2708
Illegal PstI site found at 5089 - 25INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]Illegal EcoRI site found at 2760
Illegal SpeI site found at 2708
Illegal PstI site found at 5089
Illegal NgoMIV site found at 3549
Illegal AgeI site found at 5665
Illegal AgeI site found at 6034
Illegal AgeI site found at 6361 - 1000INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]Illegal BsaI site found at 1635
Illegal BsaI site found at 6223
Illegal BsaI site found at 6241
Illegal BsaI.rc site found at 3012
Illegal BsaI.rc site found at 3659
Illegal BsaI.rc site found at 5750