Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K3610007"

(Usage and Biology)
Line 11: Line 11:
  
 
For visualizing the interaction of EFR with BAK1, the cytoplasmic domain can be replaced with a split fluorescent protein or another protein that generates a visual output. In our iGEM project, we fused this sequence to a split-mCherry protein and a split-luciferase in another experiment and then coexpressed the part with BAK1 carrying the counterpart to the split protein instead of the intracellular kinase domain in S. cerevisiae.
 
For visualizing the interaction of EFR with BAK1, the cytoplasmic domain can be replaced with a split fluorescent protein or another protein that generates a visual output. In our iGEM project, we fused this sequence to a split-mCherry protein and a split-luciferase in another experiment and then coexpressed the part with BAK1 carrying the counterpart to the split protein instead of the intracellular kinase domain in S. cerevisiae.
 +
 +
==Characterization==
 +
===Usage with YFP===
 +
 +
We fused the ectodomain of EFR to the yellow fluorescent protein and expressed it in <i>S. cerevisiae</i>. For a more elaborate characterization of this part see [[Part:K3610045]].
 +
 +
====Fluorescent Microscopy====
 +
 +
After successful transformation of yeast cells we checked for enhanced fluorescence with confocal fluorescence microscopy.
 +
 +
[[File:T--UZurich--eEFR.png|800px|]]
 +
[[File:T--UZurich--Control.png|800px|]]
 +
 +
 +
Imaging of the <i>S. cerevisiae</i> cells, which had been previously transfected with plasmids containing this construct, revealed increased fluorescence levels than the untransfected control. These results imply increased expression of YFP, indicating expression of the EFR ectodomain.
 +
Additionally, the imaging results suggest that the proteins are in part localized at the cellular membrane, which is in alignment with our expectations as there is a secretion signal peptide and a transmembrane domain in the construct.
 +
 +
====Spectrometry====
 +
 +
In addition to analyzing the cells with a microscope, we conducted a fluorescence assay with a plate reader. We conducted this experiment for multiple receptors at the same time. This way we were able to compare the expression levels of different receptors.
 +
 +
The results of these measurements are displayed in the table below.
 +
{| class="wikitable"
 +
|-
 +
! scope="col", colspan ="10"| Fluorescence normalized for OD600
 +
|-
 +
!Control
 +
!BAK+
 +
!BAK-
 +
!eBAK
 +
!eCORE
 +
!eEFR
 +
|-
 +
|4185,221063||9731,614266||26067,19254||28118,24739||3712,946478||23379,84399
 +
|}
 +
 +
If we set the values for the Control to 1 (Control = 1), then we get the fluorescence levels relative to the control, which is again diplayed in the table below.
 +
 +
{| class="wikitable"
 +
|-
 +
!Control
 +
!eCORE
 +
!eEFR
 +
!BAK-
 +
!BAK+
 +
!eBAK
 +
|-
 +
|1||0,8871565975||5,586286516||6,228390841||2,325233033||6,718461693
 +
|}
 +
 +
<br>
 +
[[File:T--UZurich--Spectrometer_1.png|500px|none|left|Figure 3: Fluorescence values standardized for OD600 of the different receptors (C=Control). Cells with BAK+ showed only weak fluorescence, while BAK-, eBAK and eEFR showed a strong increase in the fluorescence levels. CORE did not display any increase when compared with untreated <i>S. cerevisiae</i> cells (autofluorescence).]]
 +
 +
Results of the plate reader suggested increased fluorescence through expression of YFP. The same was observed when cells were examined with the microscope. Therefore, <i>S. cerevisiae</i> cells express the plasmid containing the EFR ectodomain. Additionally, microscopy revealed localization at the cell membrane. This localization at the cell periphery is a big success as it shows, that the signal peptide from the alpha-Mating factor did, in fact induce translation into the membrane. Additionally, it was shown that the intracellular kinase domain is not necessary for membrane localization.
 +
 +
This expression of the EFR ectodomain in <i> S. cerevisiae</i>, which is accompanied by localization at the cell membrane is a big achievement that opens the doors for many future applications.
  
 
<!-- -->
 
<!-- -->

Revision as of 17:19, 21 October 2020


EFR Ectodomain without signal sequence

This part is the ectodomain of the plant PRR EFR, a cell surface receptor determining the preception of the bacterial Elongation-Factor Tu.

Usage and Biology

Elongation factor-thermo unstable receptor (EFR) from A. thaliana is a plant pattern-recognition receptor (PRR). It is a cell surface receptor and part of the plants firts defence mechanism against potential pathogens. The EFR receptor is also a leucin-rich-repeats (LRR) receptor-like serine/threonine-protein kinase. The protein consists of an extracellular domain with leucin-rich repeats, a ligand binding domain found in many receptors, a single-pass transmembrane domain and finally an intracellular kinase domain. The ligand binding domain from EFR has high specificity to a bacterial pathogen-associated moleculat pattern (PAMP), namely the epitope elf18 of the abundant protein Elongation Factor Tu (EF-Tu), which is catalyzes the binding of aminoacyl-tRNA (aa-tRNA) to the ribosome in most prokaryotes and therefore is evolutionarily highly conserved. This makes the EFR a receptor that can be activated by the presence of a huge variety of bacteria. Upon binding of the ligand to the extracellular domain, the receptor dimerizes with its coreceptor BRI1-associated receptor kinase (BAK1). This interaction triggers the activation of the intracellular kinase domain of EFR and BAK1, initiating a signal cascade leading to an upregulation of immune response mechanisms. When the ectodomains of EFR and another PRR are swapped, the new chimeric receptors are sometimes still functional (depending on which second receptor is chosen). It has further been shown, that for binding of the ligand and dimerization with BAK1 the extracellular domain and the transmembrane domain are needed. The kinase domain is not necessary for initiating this interaction.

For visualizing the interaction of EFR with BAK1, the cytoplasmic domain can be replaced with a split fluorescent protein or another protein that generates a visual output. In our iGEM project, we fused this sequence to a split-mCherry protein and a split-luciferase in another experiment and then coexpressed the part with BAK1 carrying the counterpart to the split protein instead of the intracellular kinase domain in S. cerevisiae.

Characterization

Usage with YFP

We fused the ectodomain of EFR to the yellow fluorescent protein and expressed it in S. cerevisiae. For a more elaborate characterization of this part see Part:K3610045.

Fluorescent Microscopy

After successful transformation of yeast cells we checked for enhanced fluorescence with confocal fluorescence microscopy.

T--UZurich--eEFR.png T--UZurich--Control.png


Imaging of the S. cerevisiae cells, which had been previously transfected with plasmids containing this construct, revealed increased fluorescence levels than the untransfected control. These results imply increased expression of YFP, indicating expression of the EFR ectodomain. Additionally, the imaging results suggest that the proteins are in part localized at the cellular membrane, which is in alignment with our expectations as there is a secretion signal peptide and a transmembrane domain in the construct.

Spectrometry

In addition to analyzing the cells with a microscope, we conducted a fluorescence assay with a plate reader. We conducted this experiment for multiple receptors at the same time. This way we were able to compare the expression levels of different receptors.

The results of these measurements are displayed in the table below.

Fluorescence normalized for OD600
Control BAK+ BAK- eBAK eCORE eEFR
4185,221063 9731,614266 26067,19254 28118,24739 3712,946478 23379,84399

If we set the values for the Control to 1 (Control = 1), then we get the fluorescence levels relative to the control, which is again diplayed in the table below.

Control eCORE eEFR BAK- BAK+ eBAK
1 0,8871565975 5,586286516 6,228390841 2,325233033 6,718461693


Figure 3: Fluorescence values standardized for OD600 of the different receptors (C=Control). Cells with BAK+ showed only weak fluorescence, while BAK-, eBAK and eEFR showed a strong increase in the fluorescence levels. CORE did not display any increase when compared with untreated S. cerevisiae cells (autofluorescence).

Results of the plate reader suggested increased fluorescence through expression of YFP. The same was observed when cells were examined with the microscope. Therefore, S. cerevisiae cells express the plasmid containing the EFR ectodomain. Additionally, microscopy revealed localization at the cell membrane. This localization at the cell periphery is a big success as it shows, that the signal peptide from the alpha-Mating factor did, in fact induce translation into the membrane. Additionally, it was shown that the intracellular kinase domain is not necessary for membrane localization.

This expression of the EFR ectodomain in S. cerevisiae, which is accompanied by localization at the cell membrane is a big achievement that opens the doors for many future applications.

Sequence and Features


Assembly Compatibility:
  • 10
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
  • 12
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
    Illegal NheI site found at 82
    Illegal NheI site found at 1012
    Illegal NheI site found at 1930
  • 21
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
  • 23
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
  • 25
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
    Illegal NgoMIV site found at 1598
  • 1000
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]