Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K3634020:Design"
(→Design Notes) |
|||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Additionally, a CviJI restriction site was already present in the initial gene sequence at position 477 (a perfect example of evolution at work given such a small frequency). To prevent the enzyme cutting its own gene sequence, the St Andrews iGEM team 2020 looked at in silico point mutagenesis for this site however unfortunately, no alternative was available as the codon involved in the restriction site was that of tryptophan (TGG/CCT). As this is the only CviJI restriction site present in the gene sequence, it is likely that this Trp residue is vital to the function of the enzyme. This was considered however to follow in the same HGT vein as with introducing R.CviJI in the first place as it meant a functioning endonuclease gene would less likely be transformed into other bacterial species. | Additionally, a CviJI restriction site was already present in the initial gene sequence at position 477 (a perfect example of evolution at work given such a small frequency). To prevent the enzyme cutting its own gene sequence, the St Andrews iGEM team 2020 looked at in silico point mutagenesis for this site however unfortunately, no alternative was available as the codon involved in the restriction site was that of tryptophan (TGG/CCT). As this is the only CviJI restriction site present in the gene sequence, it is likely that this Trp residue is vital to the function of the enzyme. This was considered however to follow in the same HGT vein as with introducing R.CviJI in the first place as it meant a functioning endonuclease gene would less likely be transformed into other bacterial species. | ||
| − | As previously mentioned, placing a lon protease ssrA degradation tag onto R.CviJI would mop up any leaky expression of the fusion construct in order to prevent unwanted plasmid fragmentation too early. The strong AANDENYALAA degradation tag was initially suggested however it was thought this sequence was too strong to allow any endonuclease functionality when expressed. As a result, the tag was replaced with a 'moderately fast' AANDENYADAS degradation tag. The TAG stop codon of the R.CviJI gene was removed and replaced with the AANDENYADAS sequence. TAATAA was then added to the 3' end of the the ssrA to terminate translation. | + | As previously mentioned, placing a lon protease ssrA degradation tag onto R.CviJI would mop up any leaky expression of the fusion construct in order to prevent unwanted plasmid fragmentation too early. The strong AANDENYALAA degradation tag was initially suggested however it was thought this sequence was too strong to allow any endonuclease functionality when expressed. As a result, the tag was replaced with a 'moderately fast' AANDENYADAS degradation tag. The TAG stop codon of the R.CviJI gene was removed and replaced with the AANDENYADAS sequence. TAATAA was then added to the 3' end of the the ssrA to terminate translation. |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
===Source=== | ===Source=== | ||
Revision as of 13:20, 9 August 2020
CviJI Endonuclease (+ ssrA deg. tag)
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
- 21COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
- 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]Illegal AgeI site found at 316
Illegal AgeI site found at 459 - 1000COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]
Design Notes
As the gene is new to the registry, it must meet BBa assembly standards. A BsaI illegal restriction site was present at position 503. This was subsequently removed by in silico point mutagenesis: t501a (TCT (Ser) -> TCA (Ser)). As with other parts St. Andrews iGEM 2020 have characterised, a codon optimisation step was favourable however upon using the IDT codon optimisation tool, many additional CviJI restriction sites were introduced to the cviJI gene sequence. This was of course an issue as the gene coding for the enzyme would be fragmented, limiting the amount of expression of R.CviJI. As a result, codon optimisation was abandoned.
Additionally, a CviJI restriction site was already present in the initial gene sequence at position 477 (a perfect example of evolution at work given such a small frequency). To prevent the enzyme cutting its own gene sequence, the St Andrews iGEM team 2020 looked at in silico point mutagenesis for this site however unfortunately, no alternative was available as the codon involved in the restriction site was that of tryptophan (TGG/CCT). As this is the only CviJI restriction site present in the gene sequence, it is likely that this Trp residue is vital to the function of the enzyme. This was considered however to follow in the same HGT vein as with introducing R.CviJI in the first place as it meant a functioning endonuclease gene would less likely be transformed into other bacterial species.
As previously mentioned, placing a lon protease ssrA degradation tag onto R.CviJI would mop up any leaky expression of the fusion construct in order to prevent unwanted plasmid fragmentation too early. The strong AANDENYALAA degradation tag was initially suggested however it was thought this sequence was too strong to allow any endonuclease functionality when expressed. As a result, the tag was replaced with a 'moderately fast' AANDENYADAS degradation tag. The TAG stop codon of the R.CviJI gene was removed and replaced with the AANDENYADAS sequence. TAATAA was then added to the 3' end of the the ssrA to terminate translation.
Source
The sequence for R.CviJI, native to Chlorella virus IL-3A, was obtained from Skowron et al. (1995) and confirmed by Swaminathan et al. (1996) (ENA reference: U09001.1). The sequence for the ssrA degradation tag was obtained from registry part BBa_M0052 by the Endy lab (2007).