Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K3187016"
m |
|||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 165: | Line 165: | ||
Figure 2 : | Figure 2 : | ||
</b> | </b> | ||
− | Jablonski diagram showing the energy transfer between a FRET-pair (inspired by <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F%C3%B6rster_resonance_energy_transfer#/media/File:FRET_Jablonski_diagram.svg"target="_blank">Alex M. Mooney)</a> | + | Jablonski diagram showing the energy transfer between a FRET-pair (inspired by <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F%C3%B6rster_resonance_energy_transfer#/media/File:FRET_Jablonski_diagram.svg"target="_blank">Alex M. Mooney).</a> |
</p> | </p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 179: | Line 179: | ||
monomeric. You can see in <b>Fig. 3</b> that the purifications were successful. Next, we tested | monomeric. You can see in <b>Fig. 3</b> that the purifications were successful. Next, we tested | ||
if the purified sortases connect two proteins that carry the important Sortase-recognition tags, | if the purified sortases connect two proteins that carry the important Sortase-recognition tags, | ||
− | N-terminal polyG and C-terminal LPETGG. Therefore, we used exemplary the Sortase A7M<a | + | N-terminal polyG and C-terminal LPETGG. Therefore, we used exemplary the Sortase A7M <a |
href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K3187028" | href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K3187028" | ||
target="_blank">(BBa_K3187028)</a>. | target="_blank">(BBa_K3187028)</a>. | ||
Line 200: | Line 200: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
− | <h3>How do we measure sortase reaction kinetics</h3> | + | <h3>How do we measure sortase reaction kinetics?</h3> |
<p> | <p> | ||
In the described assays performed with <a | In the described assays performed with <a |
Latest revision as of 22:11, 21 October 2019
Sortase A5M
Profile
Name | Sortase A5M |
Base pairs | 450 |
Molecular weight | 17.85 kDa |
Origin | Staphylococcus aureus, synthetic |
Properties | Ca2+-dependent, transpeptidase, linking sorting motif LPXTG to poly-glycine Tag |
Usage and Biology
Transpeptidase: Sortase
Sortases belong to the class of transpeptidases and are mostly found in gram-positive bacteria.
The high rate of resistance to several antibiotics targeting gram-positive bacteria is also based on the
property of this enzyme class. Sortases can non-specifically attach virulence and
adhesion‐associated proteins to the peptidoglycans of the cell-surface.
In general, sortases are divided into six groups (A-F) that have slightly different properties and
perform three tasks in cells. Group A and B attach proteins to the cell-surface while Group C and D help
building pilin-like structures. Group E and F are not properly investigated yet which is why their exact
function is not known.
For our project we are especially interested in the sortases of the group A since they
covalently attach various proteins or peptides on the cell membrane as long as their targeting
motif is at the C-terminus of the corresponding protein. In comparison to other transpeptidases
Sortase A has the advantage that it is rather stable regarding variations in pH.
Sortase A catalyzes the formation and cleavage of a peptide bond between the C-terminal
LPXTG amino acid motif and an N-terminal poly-glycine motif. The enzyme originates from
Staphylococcus aureus and is able to connect any two proteins as long as they possess those
matching target sequences. In the pentapeptide motif LPXTG, X can be any amino acid except cysteine.
Sortase A is rather promiscuous with regard to the amino acid sequence directly upstream of
this motif, a fact that makes it optimal for labeling applications. Even better, amino acids C-terminal
of the poly-glycine motif are not constrained to a certain sequence.
Reaction
To better understand how the enzymatic reaction works it is necessary to look at the crystal structure of Sortase A. The enyzme consists of an eight-stranded β‐barrel fold structure. The active site is hydrophobic and contains the catalytic cysteine residue Cys184 as well as a key histidine residue H120 that can form a thiolate-imidazolium with the neighboring cysteine. An additional structural property that also other sortases show is the calcium binding site formed by the β3/β4 loop. The binding of a calcium ion slows the motion of the active site by coordinating to a residue in the β6/β7 loop. This helps binding the substrate and increasing the enzymatic activity nearly eightfold. When a substrate gets into the active site, the cysteine attacks the amide bond between the threonine and the glycine in the LPXTG motif. After this the protonated imidazolium serves as an acid for the departing glycine with unbound NH2 of the former amide bond while the rest of the motif is bound to the cysteine residue. Another glycine nucleophile is then necessary in its deprotonated form to attack the thioester and re-establish an amide bond at the LPET-motif. This reaction is dead-ended if the used nucleophile is water. Due to the fact that the mechanism is based on protonated forms of the catalytic residues the reaction is quite pH-dependent. Although the Sortase A in general is relatively stable between pH 3 and 11 the reaction works best around pH 8.
Sortase variants
Due to the fact that the wildtype Sortase A shows rather slow kinetics, a pentamutant has been developed (Sortase A5M). This version of the enzyme carries mutations in P94R/D160N/D165A/K190E/K196T which lead to a 140- fold increase in activity. Thereby, reaction rates are improved even at low temperature, however, Sortase A5M is still Ca2+-dependent. This dependence interferes with potential in vivo usage, as the concentrations of calcium in living cells can vary considerably. Hence a sortase mutant that acts across high differences in calcium concentrations or even works completely Ca2+-independently would be required for in vivo applications of sortase. To attain a high yield enzyme which is also calcium-independent Ca2+-independent mutations were combined with the Sortase A5M resulting in Sortase A7 variants such as the Sortase A7M. The newly achieved calcium-independence of these variants enable sortase applications not only in vitro but in vivo as well.
Methods
Cloning
The methods used for cloning of the different mutants of the sortase were restriction and ligation via NdeI and SalI and Gibson assembly. The Sortase A5M was cloned into pET24(+) vector via restriction and ligation with NdeI and SalI as restriction enzymes. The vector posesses a kanamycin resistance and the srta5m is controlled through a T7 promoter, which can be induced with IPTG. Sortase A7M is controlled by the same T7 promoter. Sortase A, introduced by iGEM Stockholm 2016, was cloned via Gibson assembly into PSB1C3. This has a chloramphenicol resistance and is also controlled under a T7 promoter. Cloning of all products was checked via sequencing.
Expression and purification
After successfully transforming our sortase genes in BL21 cells, we inoculated 100 mL overnight cultures, with the respective antibiotic. The next day 1 L cultures were inoculated with the overnight culture to reach OD600 = 0.1. Subsequently the cultures were incubated under constant shaking at 37 °C until they reached OD600 = 0.6. At OD600 = 0.6 the cultures were induced with 0.5 mL of 1 M Isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactopyranosid (IPTG). The gene expression was performed at 30 °C under constant shaking overnight. After expression of Sortase A7M, Sortase A5M, and Sortase A from Stockholm (BBa_K2144008) in BL21 cultures, the cells were crushed via EmulsiFlex (Avestin) and proteins were purified through affinity chromatography via Fast Protein Liquid Chromatography (FPLC) with the ÄKTA pure (GE Healthcare, Illinois, USA). His-Tag was used for purification of Sortase A7M and Sortase A (Stockholm) and Strep-Tag II was used for purification of Sortase A5M.
SDS-Page
To verify the successful production of Sortase A7M, Sortase A5M, and Sortase A SDS-PAGEs were performed. The resulting bands were compared to the molecular weight of the different sortase variants. Also, SDS-PAGEs were completed to verify enzymatic activity in assays prior to measuring sortase properties via Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET).
Flourescence Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET)
To determine the kinetics of our transpeptidase variants, FRET assays were performed in 384 well-plates (dark) using a Tecan plate reader. A FRET relies on the phenomenon that an excited fluorophore (donor) transfers energy to another fluorophore (acceptor), thereby exciting it. This process only works if both fluorescent molecules are in close proximity and depends on the FRET-Pair. By transferring the energy from donor to acceptor, the donor's emission is reduced and the intensity of the acceptors emission is increased . The efficiency depends on the distance between the fluorophore, the orientation and the spectral characteristics . You can see the principle of FRET in Fig. 2.
Results
Characterization of Sortase A5M (and comparison to BBa_K3187028)
How do we measure if our purified sortases are active?
After purification of the sortases, we performed SDS-PAGEs to verify that they are pure and monomeric. You can see in Fig. 3 that the purifications were successful. Next, we tested if the purified sortases connect two proteins that carry the important Sortase-recognition tags, N-terminal polyG and C-terminal LPETGG. Therefore, we used exemplary the Sortase A7M (BBa_K3187028).
How do we measure sortase reaction kinetics?
In the described assays performed with Sortase A7M, we noticed the impact of enzyme-substrate ratio and reaction duration on the overall product yield. We thought about how to further measure the kinetics of the sortase reaction. In the literature, sortase reaction kinetics are often measured by FRET-assays. Therefore, we designed a suitable FRET-assay. In the end, we came up with a new FRET pair not described in the literature to date: 5-TAMRA-LPETG and GGGG-sfGFP.
Development of a new FRET pair
For characterization of the reaction kinetics of Sortase A7M, Sortase A5M and Sortase A, we decided to develop a suitable FRET pair. In order to find an optimal FRET pair, we first recorded an emission and absorption spectrum of 5-Carboxytetramethylrhodamin-LPETG (TAMRA) and GGGG-mCherry to verify the suitability for the FRET effect, checking for a possible overlap between the donor's emission and the acceptor's excitation.
TAMRA is a chemical fluorophore that has an absorbance maximum at 543 nm and an emission
maximum at
570 nm. The
terminal carboxy
group of the dye was linked via a lysine linker to the LPETG sequence (see Fig. 5).
mCherry has
an N-terminal poly-glycine sequence and can therefore be linked to the LPETG motif of TAMRA via
the
Sortase A. For a sufficient FRET-effect, it is also necessary that the distance between
donor and
acceptor is lower than the Förster radius. The Förster radius describes the distance between two
fluorophores at which 50 % of the energy is transferred.
First, we wanted to identify which concentrations are needed for our experiment, then set up the
reaction
and measured fluorescence intensities. Over time, a decline in the emission of TAMRA can be
observed as
Sortase A7M/A5M is converting more educts to products.
The emission and excitation spectra of TAMRA and mCherry exhibit an overlap of emission of TAMRA and excitation of mCherry. Based on this output, a FRET-assay for the kinetics of Sortase A7M was performed to confirm whether the FRET-pair is working. As TAMRA is excited with light of a lower wavelength than mCherry, the former serves as FRET donor and the latter as acceptor. We chose the excitation wavelength at 485 nm to prevent unnecessary “leak” excitation of mCherry. Nevertheless, an excitation of mCherry could not be excluded and may have negative effects on the visibility of the FRET.
The analysis of the data shown in Fig. 7 confirmed the aforementioned suspicion that mCherry is also excited at 485 nm, which makes differentiation of the fluorescence more difficult. Furthermore, Fig. 8 shows that the difference in the decline of TAMRA is not significant. Accordingly, a decline in the emission maximum of TAMRA over time is also visible in the negative control. One reason might be bleaching of TAMRA through the excitation by the laser. Nevertheless, conversion by the Sortase A7M can be observed by comparing the results with the negative control.
To confirm the functionality of the sortases exemplary with Sortase A7M, another more sufficient FRET-pair was developed. The measured absorbance and emission spectra indicated that TAMRA and superfolder green fluorescence protein (sfGFP) are a possible FRET-pair. The sfGFP has an N-terminal polyglycine sequence and can therefore be linked to TAMRA with the sorting motif, in the same way as mCherry was connected. However, the small overlap between the extinction spectra of sfGFP and TAMRA could solve the previous “simultaneous excitation” problem we observed for the mCherry-TAMRA FRET-pair. Because of the lower excitation maximum of sfGFP compared to TAMRA, sfGFP was chosen as donor and TAMRA as acceptor. sfGFP was excited at 465 nm to minimize the unnecessary leak excitation of sfGFP.
The transfer of energy from sfGFP to TAMRA can be seen by the decrease in emission of sfGFP and increase in emission from TAMRA. Compared to TAMRA as an acceptor, the sfGFP bleaches significantly less and is consequently more suitable as a donor for FRET. Furthermore, the afore mentioned problem of simultaneous donor and acceptor excitation seems to be solved. It seems that we have found a FRET-pair with superior properties.
Due to the collected data of both FRET-pairs we decided to use the TAMRA-LPETG and GGGG-sfGFP FRET-pair for further characterization of our Sortase A variants. Two reasons justify this decision:
- TAMRA bleaches stronger than sfGFP when excited with a laser.
- The spectral overlap between TAMRA and mCherry disturbs “clean” energy transfer, thus the FRET-effect would be less visible and could not be used for analysis of the sortase-mediated reaction.
For recording of sortase reaction parameters we recommend using the FRET-pair sfGFP-TAMRA. As this pair of fluorophores proved to have near perfectly aligned spectra and since the bleaching effect is visibly lower on sfGFP than on TAMRA, we chose to use this FRET-pair in most of our following assay. Nevertheless, we do not rule out the use of TAMRA-mCherry as a FRET-pair since we used it in several FRET-assays as well.
Why are enzyme-substrate ratio and duration important parameters of the sortase reaction?
In one of our first FRET experiments, we addressed the simple theory: More sortase in the reaction mix improves the initial product formation. For this, we used the TAMRA-LPETG : GGGG-mCherry FRET pair. We measured the FRET change over time in a multiwell platereader (Fig. 15).
However, in this assay we observed a striking feature of the sortase reaction. In the reaction with more Sortase A7M present, the FRET change started to decrease after a certain maximum was reached! We suspected some kind of dead-end product formation, as the sortase does also catalyze the reverse reaction of product to educts. Therefore, the overall reaction duration is a very important parameter. We gathered more details about the role of the reverse reaction during our comparison of Sortase A7M and Sortase A5M. Just keep reading if you want to know more!
Who wins - Sortase A7M or Sortase A5M
In our introduction we described that Sortase A7M and Sortase A5M are both fascinating enzymes, although each of them has a unique „selling point“. Sortase A5M is faster, whereas Sortase A7M is Ca2+-independent. We confirmed both of these points in extensive FRET-assays. According to the literature, Sortase A5M works best with a Ca2+-concentration of 2 mM. In contrast, Sortase A7M is a calcium-independent mutant of the enzyme. Moreover, Ca2+ even seems to inhibit this enzyme variant slightly .
Firstly, we confirmed that in contrast to Sortase A5M, Sortase A7M is Ca2+-independent. The results are shown in Fig. 16 Sortase A7M also works in presence of Ca2+, but these FRET experiments made us suspect that Ca2+ may even inhibit Sortase A7M.
Secondly, we confirmed that Sortase A5M is inactive if Ca2+ is absent, which can be seen in Fig. 17 As expected, Sortase A5M shows increasing enzymatic activity with increasing Ca2+ levels. The reaction runs fastest with 2 mM Ca2+, and the maximal FRET change (in terms of ΔRFU) is reached after 37.5 min. Strikingly, the FRET change decreases afterwards. We observed this phenomenon before and assume this to be due to dead-end product formation caused by the reverse reaction.
According to the results of this assay, Sortase A7M is definitely Ca2+-independent, since it shows linking activity without calcium in the vicinity. The enzyme mutant also works in presence of Ca2+ (Fig. 17), but these FRET experiments made us suspect that Ca2+ may even inhibit Sortase A7M, since it shows less activity with calcium around, than without calcium.
When we compare the reaction speed of Sortase A5M and Sortase A7M, Sortase A5M is the clear winner (see Fig. : 19). However, this means of course that the reverse reaction is also faster in the case of Sortase A5M. Consequently, Sortase A7M is the best variant for in vivo modification of our VLPs as it is Ca2+-independent. On the other hand, Sortase A5M is a suitable enzyme variant for in vitro modification due to its high efficiency.
Sequence and Features
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
- 21COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
- 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
- 1000COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]