Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa J10052:Experience"
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
Differences in promoter strength had more effect on enzymatic expression compared to differences in RBS strengths as evidenced in the graphs below. Lambert_GA 2019 had originally thought that BBa_J10052 would result in the least amount of expression out of the tested combinations, but this part, along with BBa_J10050 and BBa_J10051, all shared the lowest expression out of the combinations. This is due to the translation rate not being an important factor in the determination of expression of ONP; however, the promoter strength is a significant factor. In other words, expression values are significantly different with different promoters but not with different RBS strengths. | Differences in promoter strength had more effect on enzymatic expression compared to differences in RBS strengths as evidenced in the graphs below. Lambert_GA 2019 had originally thought that BBa_J10052 would result in the least amount of expression out of the tested combinations, but this part, along with BBa_J10050 and BBa_J10051, all shared the lowest expression out of the combinations. This is due to the translation rate not being an important factor in the determination of expression of ONP; however, the promoter strength is a significant factor. In other words, expression values are significantly different with different promoters but not with different RBS strengths. | ||
| + | <br> | ||
| Line 23: | Line 24: | ||
<i><center>Figure 2: The highlighted points represent the BBa_J10052 composite part (weak promoter/ medium RBS). As the promoter strength increases, the expression increases as well.</center></i> | <i><center>Figure 2: The highlighted points represent the BBa_J10052 composite part (weak promoter/ medium RBS). As the promoter strength increases, the expression increases as well.</center></i> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
| − | |||
<center>The graphs above show that RBS strength has a negligible effect on expression, whereas increased promoter strength increases expression.</center> | <center>The graphs above show that RBS strength has a negligible effect on expression, whereas increased promoter strength increases expression.</center> | ||
| + | |||
<br> | <br> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
Latest revision as of 19:54, 21 October 2019
This experience page is provided so that any user may enter their experience using this part.
Please enter
how you used this part and how it worked out.
Applications of BBa_J10052
Lambert_GA 2019 used this part in experiments to characterize the effect of different strengths of promoters and ribosomal binding sites on expression. The data obtained can aid in the design of constructs by giving information about controlling expression.
User Reviews
Lambert_GA 2019 Characterization
Characterization of Weak Promoter (BBa_J23113) and Medium RBS (BBa_B0032)
Differences in promoter strength had more effect on enzymatic expression compared to differences in RBS strengths as evidenced in the graphs below. Lambert_GA 2019 had originally thought that BBa_J10052 would result in the least amount of expression out of the tested combinations, but this part, along with BBa_J10050 and BBa_J10051, all shared the lowest expression out of the combinations. This is due to the translation rate not being an important factor in the determination of expression of ONP; however, the promoter strength is a significant factor. In other words, expression values are significantly different with different promoters but not with different RBS strengths.
UNIQ2aeac5905a6234ae-partinfo-00000000-QINU
UNIQ2aeac5905a6234ae-partinfo-00000001-QINU