Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K3183200"

Revision as of 23:18, 19 October 2019

CD27L with N-Terminal 6-His Tag and SpyTag

CD27L with N-Terminal 6-His Tag and SpyTag for purification, oligomerisation, and SpyCatcher application. This endolysin has previously been shown to be specific to C. difficile. This endolysin works by cleaving residues¹ (Fig. 1), breaking the cell's peptidoglycan and compromising the structural integrity of its cell wall. Two X-ray crystal structures were solved^2,3, which we show by a linker we've added in Figure 2.

Figure 1: Fig. 2: SDS-PAGE Protein Purification Gel of CD27L using Ni-NTA Affinity Chromatography.

Figure 2: X-ray Crystallography Structure of CD27L (PDB codes 3QAY & 4CU5

Sequence and Features

Characterisation

We expressed endolysin in the pET28A vector following difficulties with Dundee's CD27L_1-179 endolysin BBa_K895005. We were able to achieve strong expression under the pET28A system (Fig. 3).

Figure 3: Fig. 2: SDS-PAGE Protein Purification Gel of CD27L using Ni-NTA Affinity Chromatography.

To confirm the identity of our endolysin, we wanted to run it through electrospray mass spectrometry (ESI-MS). However, given that we didn’t have access to size-exclusion chromatography, we were only able to send our CD27L protein preparation, as the other sample was far too dirty for effective ESI-MS. The identity of our endolysin, as well as putative autocleavage is shown and discussed in Fig. 4.

Figure 4: Mass Spectrometry of CD27L Endolysin Following Ni-NTA Purification

Due to safety concerns, our endolysin killing assays could only be carried out on on Bacillus subitlis, a Category 1 bacteria as opposed to Clostridium difficile, a Category 2 bacteria. B. subtilis has a similar composition of peptidogylcan cell wall to C. difficile², allowing us to quantify killing data.

To get more information about the killing kinetics of the CD27L endolysin, we titrated our killing assay with increasing concentrations of CD27L endolysin. This titration showed measurable effect on B. subtilis cultures in LB broth with final endolysin concentrations greater than 0.2mg/mL (Fig. 5). Rate constants regarding how much the endolysin inhibited growth were subsequently used to inform our model (Table 2).

From this data, we were able to obtain kinetic constants for endolysin killing, which were subsequently used in our mathematical models.

Figure 5: CD27L Endolysin Killing Assay Varying Final Endolysin Concentration; Here we show that the effect of the endolysin appears to inhibit growth at concentrations above 0.002mg/mL. Growth seems to increase significantly at 150 minutes, which may be indicative of CD27L degradation.Interestingly, 0.2mg/mL of endolysin grows linearly for duration of the assay (over 6 hours), as does 0.45mg/mL after 150 minutes. This may mean that log-phase growth is inhibited under these conditions.

We also showed that endolysin was specific to B. subtilis using a killing assay involving E. coli, B. subtilis, and our chassis Lactobacillus reuteri (Fig. 6 & 7).

Figure 6: CD27L Endolysin Killing Assay on E. coli versus Bacillus subtilis; The above graph demonstrates the specificity of the CD27L endolysin, by assaying killing on E. coli, the most common chassis used in synthetic biology applications.

Figure 7: CD27L Endolysin Killing Assay on Bacillus subtilis versus Lactobacillus reuteri; While L. reuteri grows to a smaller maximum OD600 than B. subtilis, there is no discernable change in OD600 due to endolysin . Notably, the effect of lysozyme on L. reuteri is relatively small due to its thick bacterial cell wall, and we were unable to show a killing effect. For this reason, ampicillin was chosen as our positive control.

Finally, we were fortunate enough to obtain scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images thanks to Errin Johnson at the Dunn School of Pathology. After performing our endolysin killing assay, we fixed the cells onto glass slides and imaged them. We chose this as a qualitative method to determine if CD27L had a similar effect on endolysin killing as lysozyme⁴. Below shows images of B. subtilis following CD27L endolysin treatment (Fig. 8). Here, we demonstrated some changes in B. subtilis cell morphology, but further investigation is needed to explore these effects.

Figure 8: CD27L Endolysin Killing Assay on Bacillus subtilis versus Lactobacillus reuteri; While L. reuteri grows to a smaller maximum OD600 than B. subtilis, there is no discernable change in OD600 due to endolysin . Notably, the effect of lysozyme on L. reuteri is relatively small due to its thick bacterial cell wall, and we were unable to show a killing effect. For this reason, ampicillin was chosen as our positive control.

Part Improvement of BBa_K895004

A fundamental crux of the ProQuorum system is the expression of the endolysin which is responsible for the actual lysis and consequent killing of the pathogenic C. difficile. Thus, there is a clear need for an endolysin that fulfills the criteria of being:
1. optimally expressed
2. optimally secreted and
3. optimally effective against C.difficile

Thus, we redesigned the BBa_K895005 part submitted by the 2012 Dundee iGEM team, which consists of:
1. truncated form of the CD27L endolysin, shown to increase both efficacy and host range²
2. Type VI secretion protein derived from S. typhimurium
3. Hemagglutinin (HA) Tag for Western Blotting

In contrast, our novel part BBa_K3183009 (CD27L) encodes:

1. full-length form of the CD27L endolysin
2. SpyTag for purification, oligomerisation, and other SpyCatcher applications
3. 6-His tag for easy purification

Incorporating both of these parts into pET28A, our expression vector, we planned on testing the relative efficacies of B.subtilis killing as per our killing assays. Thus, we followed our generic pipeline of:
1. transformation of both constructs into E.coli (BL21 (DE3)-RIPL Competent E.coli)
2. miniprep + sequencing to verify successful transformation
3. induction of expression with IPTG

Figure 1.1: Dundee CD27L_1-179 Construct in pET28A

Figure 1.2: 6His-SpyTag-CD27L Construct in pET28A

Thus, we sought out the endolysin in an existing part made by the 2012 iGEM Team Dundee. However, despite identical growth and induction conditions, expression of the Dundee 2012 iGEM endolysin was unsuccessful, even in triplicate, as shown in Figure 1. In contrast, expression of the CD27L_Assay part was successful and quantitatively verified via both mass spectrometry and BCA assay, as in the Results page.

Figure 2: Dundee CD27L_1-179 Expression Gel

Thus, to solve this issue, we decided to attempt expression of only the truncated endolysin from the Dundee 2012 Biobrick, without its substantially large Type VI secretion tag. This resulted in BBa_K31830012 (CD27L_{1-179</sib<). Upon analysis, there is evident expression of the truncated endolysin as seen in Figure 2. However, given identical conditions of growth and induction, there appears to be greater expression of the full-length endolysin, which may perhaps indicate greater stability.}

Figure 3: CD27L_1-179 Purification Gel

As a further improvement, we decided to measure the killing efficacy of the CD27L_Assay endolysin on B. subtilis (our surrogate target) as no killing data was provided for the Dundee 2012 BBa_K895005 part. As seen in Figure 3, there is a substantial decrease in OD600 over time relative to the negative controls.

Figure 4: CD27L_1-179 Versus CD27L in Killing B. subtilis
The truncated CD27L_1-179 shows decreased growth relative to the negative control; however, log-phase growth resumes after 150 minutes. CD27L endolysin results in decreased growth during the first 100 minutes, and growth thereafter appears to be linear. This may point to inhibited log-phase growth in subsequent generations of B. subtilis following CD27L exposure.

Reference

1. Mayer, M. J., et al. “Molecular Characterization of a Clostridium Difficile Bacteriophage and Its Cloned Biologically Active Endolysin.” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 190, no. 20, 2008, pp. 6734–6740., doi:10.1128/jb.00686-08. 2. Mayer, M. J et al. “Structure-based modification of a Clostridium difficile-targeting endolysin affects activity and host range.” Journal of bacteriology vol. 193,19 (2011): 5477-86. doi:10.1128/JB.00439-11
3. Dunne, Matthew et al. “The CD27L and CTP1L endolysins targeting Clostridia contain a built-in trigger and release factor.” PLoS pathogens vol. 10,7 e1004228. 24 Jul. 2014, doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1004228
4. Twetman, Svante, et al. “Scanning Electron Microscopic Study of Streptococcus Mutans BHT Lysed by Lysozyme.” European Journal of Oral Sciences, vol. 93, no. 1, 1985, pp. 23–29., doi:10.1111/j.1600-0722.1985.tb01304.x.