Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K3187004"

Revision as of 11:34, 19 October 2019 (view source) Lertu (Talk | contribs) ← Older edit		Revision as of 17:39, 19 October 2019 (view source) Lertu (Talk | contribs) Newer edit →
Line 96:		Line 96:
	<h3> Methods</h3>		<h3> Methods</h3>
	<h4>Cloning</h4>		<h4>Cloning</h4>
−	<p>The fusion protein was cloned into the pACYCT2 backbone with <a href="#"target="_blank">Gibson Assembly</a> . To verify the cloning,	+	<p>The fusion protein was cloned into the pACYCT2 backbone with <a href="https://2019.igem.org/wiki/images/4/44/T--TU_Darmstadt--MethodenFinal.pdf"target="_blank">Gibson Assembly</a> . To verify the cloning,
	the sequence was controlled by sanger sequencing by Microsynth Seqlab.		the sequence was controlled by sanger sequencing by Microsynth Seqlab.
	</p>		</p>
	<h4>Purification</h4>		<h4>Purification</h4>
	<p>The protein was heterologously expressed in <i>E.&nbsp;coli</i> BL21 and purified with		<p>The protein was heterologously expressed in <i>E.&nbsp;coli</i> BL21 and purified with
−	<a href="#"target="_blank">GE Healthcare ÄKTA FPLC</a>. The used affinity tag was Strep-tag II.	+	<a href="https://2019.igem.org/wiki/images/4/44/T--TU_Darmstadt--MethodenFinal.pdf"target="_blank">GE Healthcare ÄKTA FPLC</a>. The used affinity tag was Strep-tag II.
	</p>		</p>
	<h4>SDS-Page and Western blot</h4>		<h4>SDS-Page and Western blot</h4>
−	<p>To verify that the CP-LPETGG was produced, a <a href="#"target="_blank">SDS-Page</a> followed by a	+	<p>To verify that the CP-LPETGG was produced, a <a href="https://2019.igem.org/wiki/images/4/44/T--TU_Darmstadt--MethodenFinal.pdf"target="_blank">SDS-Page</a> followed by a
−	<a href="#"target="_blank">Western blot</a> was performed.	+	<a href="https://2019.igem.org/wiki/images/4/44/T--TU_Darmstadt--MethodenFinal.pdf"target="_blank">Western blot</a> was performed.
	</p>		</p>

---

Revision as of 17:39, 19 October 2019

TEV Cleavage Site x GGGG-Tag for Sortase-mediated Ligation X Superfolder Green Fluorescence Protein

Profile

Name	TEV site-polyG-scaffold protein
Base pairs	1028
Molecular weight	27.8 kDa
Origin	Tabacco Etch Virus (TEV); Aequorea victoria
Parts	T7-Promoter, lac-operator, RBS (g10 leader sequence), TEV protease recognition sequence, polyG-tag, sfGFP, Strep-tag II, T7 terminator
Properties	After cleavage by the TEV protease, the polyG tag can be used to fuse sfGFP to the Sortase A recognition sequence(LPTEGG)

Usage and Biology

The TEV protease is cleaving a protein after a specific sequence between Glutamine and Serine or Glycine ^{[1] [2]} . We are using this to create a free N-terminal polyG sequence in front of sfGFP so we can use it as substrate in a Sortase A mediated reaction ^{[3] [4] [5]} .
sfGFP is a variant of the fluorescence protein GFP that was originally isolated from the jellyfish Aequorea victoria. It has a short maturing time of 13.6 min, has an extinction maximum at 485 nm and an emission maximum at 510 nm. ^{[6] [7]}
At the end of the sfGFP a strep tag was added to enable easy protein purification.
The part contains a T7 promoter so it can be transcribed by T7 polymerase, and a lac operator so protein expression can be induced by IPTG.

Methods

Cloning

The fusion protein was cloned into the pACYCT2 backbone with Gibson Assembly . To verify the cloning, the sequence was controlled by sanger sequencing by Microsynth Seqlab.

Purification

The protein was heterologously expressed in E. coli BL21 and purified with GE Healthcare ÄKTA FPLC. The used affinity tag was Strep-tag II.

SDS-Page and Western blot

To verify that the CP-LPETGG was produced, a SDS-Page followed by a Western blot was performed.

Results

Cloning and Expression

The successful cloning was proven with sanger sequencing and production with a Western blot.

Fig. 1 shows that sfGFP with TEV cleavage site has a molecular weight of less than 25 kDa. The expected weight is 27.8 kDa.

Sortase Reactions

The protein was cleaved with TEV protease to ptoduce the N-terminal polyG tag. The cleaved protein was then used in different characterisation assays of different Sortase variants.

VLP modification

The cleaved protein was further used for modification of assembled virus-like particles.

References

1. ↑ W. Earnshaw, S. Casjens, S. C. Harrison, Assembly of the head of bacteriophage P22: X-ray diffraction from heads, proheads and related structures J. Mol. Biol. 1976, 104, 387. [1]
2. ↑ W. Jiang, Z. Li, Z. Zhang, M. L. Baker, P. E. Prevelige, W. Chiu, Coat protein fold and maturation transition of bacteriophage P22 seen at subnanometer resolutions, Nat. Struct. Biol. 2003, 10, 131. [2]
3. ↑ Dustin P. Patterson, Benjamin Schwarz, Ryan S. Waters, Tomas Gedeon, and Trevor Douglas, Encapsulation of an Enzyme Cascade within the Bacteriophage P22 Virus-Like Particle ,ACS Chemical Biology 2014 9 (2), 359-365 [3]
4. ↑ Proft, T. (2010) Sortase-mediated protein ligation: an emerging biotechnology tool for protein modification and immobilisation [4]
5. ↑ Mao, H., Hart, S. A., Schink, A., and Pollok, B. A. (2004) Sortase-mediated protein ligation: a new method for protein engineering [5]
6. ↑ Jean-Denis Pédelacq, Stéphanie Cabantous, Timothy Tran, Thomas C Terwilliger, Geoffrey S Waldo, Engineering and characterization of a superfolder green fluorescent protein, Nature Biotechnology volume24,pages79–88 (2006) [6]
7. ↑ FPbase: Superfolder GFP, last visited: 10.6.2019 [7]

Sequence and Features