Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K2973023"

Revision as of 16:16, 19 October 2019

Trigger 32B

This composite part consists of T7 Promoter (BBa_J64997) and T7 Terminator (BBa_K731721), the Ribosomal Binding Site (AGAGGAGA) and the 32B Trigger (Pardee et al., 2016). Toehold switch systems are composed of two RNA strands referred to as the switch and trigger. The switch RNA contains the coding sequence of the regulated beta lactamase gene. Upstream of this coding sequence is a hairpin-based processing module containing both a strong RBS and a start codon that is followed by a common 21 nt linker sequence coding for low-molecular-weight amino acids added to the N terminus of the gene of interest. A single-stranded toehold sequence at the 5’ end of the hairpin module provides the initial binding site for the trigger RNA strand. This trigger molecule contains an extended single stranded region that completes a branch migration process with the hairpin to expose the RBS and start codon, thereby initiating translation of the downstream gene

Usage and Biology

Aim

Our project design, utilizes the ability of the β-lactamase enzyme to hydrolyze the chromogenic substrate, nitrocefin, resulting in a color change from yellow to red. Based on this ability of β-lactamase, we decided to improve an already existing Biobrick (BBa_K1189007) which corresponds to the β-lactamase gene regulated by an inducible lacI promoter. This Biobrick part is only functional in vivo, and cannot be expressed with any of the usual in vitro transcription translation kits, because of the lack of an appropriate promoter (recognized by either T3, T7, or SP6 polymerase). Aiming to fit this part into our cell-free system and make it functional in vitro, we firstly replaced the lacI, inducible by IPTG, promoter with a T7 constitutive promoter (BBa_J64997). In order to regulate its expression, just as the lacI promoter does, we incorporated a Toehold switch sequence upstream of the CDS of β-lactamase. To be able to prove our improvement upon this part, we used the chromogenic substrate nitrocefin, which changes color from yellow (380nm) to red (490nm) when hydrolyzed by the β-lactamase enzyme. We then gathered quantitative results for the hydrolysis of our substrate, Nitrocefin, by both parts, though frequent plate reader assays after both in vivo and in vitro expression of the above mentioned constructs.

Constructs' creation

For our experiments we created the composite part BBa_K2973007 that consists of a T7 promoter, Pardee’s Toehold Switch 32B [1], a β-lactamase gene and a T7 terminator. Furthermore, we designed the composite part BBa_K2973023 that consists of a T7 promoter, Pardee’s Trigger 32B, and a T7 terminator. These parts, including the prefix & suffix sequences, were ordered from IDT and cloned into their respective plasmids (pSB1K3 vector for the 32B Trigger and pSB1C3 for the lacI β-lactamase and the 32B Toehold β-lactamase), with restriction digestion & ligation.

In vivo protein expression assay

Our first goals for our improvement experiments, was to demonstrate that our improved part can be functional in vivo, after activation from our trigger sequence, and also prove that it is able to reach the expression levels of the initial part (BBa_K1189007).

Method

In order to produce measurable and reproducible data, we used 2 biological and 2 technical replicates for each construct. Aiming to test the binding efficiency between the Toehold switch regulating the β-lactamase enzyme and the Trigger32B, we co-transformed the two plasmids that contained these constructs into BL21 (DE3) cells. Moreover, BL21 (DE3) cells were transformed with the plasmid that contains the lacI-regulated β-lactamase construct, in order to compare our improvement hypothesis.

To ensure that the absorbance measured corresponds only to the enzymatic activity of β-lactamase, we included 5 controls in our experiments:

• LB medium only (no cells) and nitrocefin

• Empty BL21 (DE3) cells (no plasmid) and nitrocefin

• BL21 (DE3) cells containing the empty vector and nitrocefin

• BL21 (DE3) cells with Toehold32B- β-lactamase and nitrocefin

• BL21 (DE3) cells with lacI- β-actamase (BBa_K1189007) and nitrocefin

The workflow of our in vivo experiments was performed as described below:

1. We grew the cultures overnight in 5ml LB (~16h) at a shaking incubator, 37oC / 210rpm

2. The following morning, we measured the OD600 of the overnight cultures

3. We diluted all cultures to OD600 = 0.1 in LB medium

4. We then grew the cells at 37 oC /210 RPM until OD600=0.5 (~2h)

5. We diluted all cells to the same OD600 (e.g. 0.5)

6. We loaded 200ul of culture in a 96-well plate (2 technical replication each) and 40ul of the nitrocefin substrate (0,5 mM), in order to perform the enzymatic assay.

7. We finally measured the absorbance at 490nm (for nitrocefin hydrolysis) and 600nm (for cell growth) in a microplate reader. We shook between measurements.

The absorbance measurements were conducted every 2 min for 75 minutes at 490nm for the hydrolyzed nitrocefin substrate, and at 600nm for the cell growth.

Results

Figure 1. Expression of β-lactamase reporter gene in vivo. Error bars represent the standard deviation for n = 2 biological replications. The substrate (nitrocefin) hydrolysis (490nm) is divided by cell growth (600nm), in order to normalize all values.

Figure 2. β-Lactamase expression levels for t=73minutes. Error bars represent the standard deviation for n = 2 biological replications.The substrate (nitrocefin) hydrolysis (490nm) is divided by cell growth (600nm), in order to normalize all values.

Figure 3. Change of the cultures’ color from yellow to red due to the hydrolyzation of nitrocefin (in vivo)

In vitro protein expression assay

For the second part of our improvement experiments we wanted to demonstrate that our improved part is not only functional in vivo but also in cell-free systems. Furthermore, we proved that the initial part (LacI-regulated β-lactamase) is not functional in vitro and cannot be expressed with our in vitro translation kit (PURExpress In vitro Protein Synthesis Kit), as it cannot be expressed with any of the usual in vitro transcription translation kits due to the lack of an appropriate promoter (recognized by either T3, T7, or SP6 polymerase).

Method

In order to produce measurable and reproducible data, we used 2 technical replicates for each construct. Τhe constructs that were used during the experiment and their respective quantities are listed below:

• T7 β-lactamase (positive control) 75nM

• Toehold 32B β-Lactamase (negative control) 75nM

• Toehold 32B β-Lactamase 70ng + Trigger 32B 75nM

• Toehold 32B β-Lactamase 70ng + Trigger 32B 7nM

• LacI β-Lactamase (initial part) 75nM

Our in vitro experiments were performed with the PURExpress Ιn Vitro Protein Synthesis Kit provided by New England Biolabs (NEB). We followed the standard protocol for a typical 7ul PURExpress reaction. Each PURExpress reaction was incubated for 3 hours for each construct. Finally, we measured the absorbance levels of our samples every 30 seconds for 45minutes total, at 490nm to be able to have quantitive results for the hydrolyzation of our substrate (Nitrocefin).

Results

Figure 4. Expression of β-lactamase reporter gene in vitro. Error bars represent the standard deviation for n = 2 technical replications.

Figure 5. Colour-change from yellow to red due to the hydrolyzation of nitrocefin (in vitro). Sequence and Features