Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K3265026"

Line 15: Line 15:
  
 
To test if our part could now produce the EutM and EutN proteins at levels low enough so that it would not be toxic to the cells anymore, we redid the OD measurement with the original EutSMN part.
 
To test if our part could now produce the EutM and EutN proteins at levels low enough so that it would not be toxic to the cells anymore, we redid the OD measurement with the original EutSMN part.
<br>
+
<br><br><br>
  
100mL LB cultures were incoluated with a single colony from an overnight transformation of pSEVA441 vector carrying our improved EutSMN part. E. coli strain DH5alpha was used.<br>
+
<b> Procedure </b> <br><br>
 +
 
 +
100mL LB cultures were inculcated with a single colony from an overnight transformation of pSEVA441 vector carrying our improved EutSMN part. E. coli strain DH5alpha was used.<br>
  
 
<br>
 
<br>
Line 24: Line 26:
  
 
Measurements were taken each hour for 9 hours and a final measurement was taken after 20 hours.
 
Measurements were taken each hour for 9 hours and a final measurement was taken after 20 hours.
 +
 +
=Results=
  
 
https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/2/25/T--UZurich--gold-new.png
 
https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/2/25/T--UZurich--gold-new.png
  
  
It seems that our very weak RBS J61001 is doing a good job at keeping the base expression levels low enough so that not a lot of the protein is produced.
+
It seems that our very weak RBS J61001 is doing a good job at keeping the base expression levels low enough so that not a lot of the protein is produced.<br><br><br>
 +
 
 +
<b> Imaging </b> <br><br>
  
 
We confirmed with imaging that the protein is produced at high enough levels to form compartment:
 
We confirmed with imaging that the protein is produced at high enough levels to form compartment:
Line 34: Line 40:
  
  
This picture was taken 10 hours past induction, the signal does not seem very strong but there were many bacteria showing the self assembled microcompartments.
+
This picture was taken 10 hours past induction, the signal does not seem very strong but there were many bacteria showing the self assembled microcompartments. <br><br>
 +
 
 +
INSERT IMAGE
 +
 
 +
The control was also imaged: <br><br>
  
https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/5/5f/T--UZurich--bac_gold_new.png
+
INSERT IMAGE HERE
  
 
<!-- -->
 
<!-- -->

Revision as of 08:43, 17 October 2019


EutSMN bacterial microcompartment

This is an improved version of part BBa_K2213012 from team Manchester 2017. We down-regulated the base expression by exchanging the RBS to a the very weak RBS J61100. EDIT


Usage and Biology

Characterization

To test if our part could now produce the EutM and EutN proteins at levels low enough so that it would not be toxic to the cells anymore, we redid the OD measurement with the original EutSMN part.


Procedure

100mL LB cultures were inculcated with a single colony from an overnight transformation of pSEVA441 vector carrying our improved EutSMN part. E. coli strain DH5alpha was used.


Cultures were grown for 4 hours at 37° 300 rpm and then induced with 4.5 ng/mL Anhydrotetracylcine (ATC) or 45 ng/mL Tetracycline (Tetc) and 1mM Arabinose ((+)araB) each. One culture was not induced (control).

Measurements were taken each hour for 9 hours and a final measurement was taken after 20 hours.

Results

T--UZurich--gold-new.png


It seems that our very weak RBS J61001 is doing a good job at keeping the base expression levels low enough so that not a lot of the protein is produced.


Imaging

We confirmed with imaging that the protein is produced at high enough levels to form compartment:


This picture was taken 10 hours past induction, the signal does not seem very strong but there were many bacteria showing the self assembled microcompartments.

INSERT IMAGE

The control was also imaged:

INSERT IMAGE HERE

Sequence and Features


Assembly Compatibility:
  • 10
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
  • 12
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
    Illegal NheI site found at 1293
  • 21
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
    Illegal BamHI site found at 1232
  • 23
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
  • 25
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
    Illegal AgeI site found at 1067
    Illegal AgeI site found at 3824
  • 1000
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]
    Illegal BsaI.rc site found at 3212