Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K3128001:Experience"
(→Applications of BBa_K3128001) |
|||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
More information : [https://2019.igem.org/Team:Grenoble-Alpes/Design Grenoble-Alpes 2019] | More information : [https://2019.igem.org/Team:Grenoble-Alpes/Design Grenoble-Alpes 2019] | ||
− | Our detection system is based on the use of a BACTH. The point is to | + | Our detection system is based on the use of a BACTH. The point is to conditonally induce the expression of the gene upon interaction of the two sub-parts of '''Adenylate Cyclase''' (AC) are physically close, which only occurs when the target is present in the sample and detected by our NanoDrop system.<br> The re-constitution of AC then '''enables cAMP production''', which will '''activate a CAP dependent promotor allowing the transcription of the downstream gene'''.<br> |
− | + | In order to perform the assay we needed to use an '''AC deficient bacteria strain''' <i>(BTH101)</i> that do not produce endogenic cAMP. This property prevents any transcription from CAP dependant promoter such as lactose promoter.<br> | |
− | For the choice of the promoter, we | + | For the choice of the promoter, we decided to use the '''lactose promoter''' (a CAP dependent promoter) and we have demonstrated its '''repression in absence of cAMP''' (in the AC deficient bacterial strain), thus preventing any transcription of the following gene : '''the reporter one''' <i>(see table and figure 1)</i>. |
− | To resume, the | + | To resume, the expressed/overexpressed of the gene is under the control of '''cAMP''' For a good sensitivity of our system, statistically different signals have to be recorded on negative sample (no AC reconstitution) and positive sample (constitutive reconstitution of sub-parts of the AC). |
<br> | <br> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
To prove that the reporter gene efficiently works in our system different conditions were tested.<br> | To prove that the reporter gene efficiently works in our system different conditions were tested.<br> | ||
− | First the leak of our reporter | + | First the leak of our reporter in absence of cAMP was measured by transforming the plasmid containing the '''BioBrick PLac_NanoLuc''' in <i>BTH101</i>. |
<br> | <br> | ||
<span style="margin: 15%;"> | <span style="margin: 15%;"> | ||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
</span> | </span> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
− | At | + | At condition imitating the target's recognition was tested. |
− | '''Leucine-Zipper''' (LZ) were used to | + | '''Leucine-Zipper''' (LZ) were used to mimic the presence of the target and the physical connexion between both sub-parts. LZ have the capacity to form '''homodimer''' and so were added at the end of both sub-parts making them able to '''stick to each other in absence of target thus restoring the AC activity.''' <br> |
− | Two plasmids were co-transformed in BTH101: '''pUT18-LZ''' containing the AC sub-part T18 fused with a LZ and '''pKT25-LZ_NLuc''' containing both the AC sub-part T25 fused with a LZ and the BioBrick PLac_NanoLuc.<br> | + | Two plasmids were co-transformed in BTH101: '''pUT18-LZ''' containing the AC sub-part T18 fused with a LZ at the C terminal and '''pKT25-LZ_NLuc''' containing both the AC sub-part T25 fused with a LZ at the C terminal and the BioBrick PLac_NanoLuc.<br> |
<br> | <br> | ||
https://2019.igem.org/wiki/images/thumb/6/6b/T--Grenoble-Alpes--Plasmid_pUT18LZ_pKT25LZ_NLuc.png/800px-T--Grenoble-Alpes--Plasmid_pUT18LZ_pKT25LZ_NLuc.png | https://2019.igem.org/wiki/images/thumb/6/6b/T--Grenoble-Alpes--Plasmid_pUT18LZ_pKT25LZ_NLuc.png/800px-T--Grenoble-Alpes--Plasmid_pUT18LZ_pKT25LZ_NLuc.png | ||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
− | If there is a | + | If there is a significant difference of luminescence between the free sub-parts condition and the target detection imitating condition then it will demonstrate that our reporter gene is working in our system. <br> |
− | '''It will also show | + | '''It will also show the cAMP dependent on/off transcription switch'''.<br> |
==The assay== | ==The assay== | ||
− | Bacterial culture were induced with '''0.5mM of IPTG at | + | Bacterial culture were induced with '''0.5mM of IPTG at an Optical Density of 0.6'''.<br> |
The subtract for Nano Luciferase (furimazine) was added as follow : for '''50uL''' of bacterial culture in a well, '''49uL of NanoGlo Assay Buffer and 1uL of NanoGlo Assay Substrat''' were added.<br> | The subtract for Nano Luciferase (furimazine) was added as follow : for '''50uL''' of bacterial culture in a well, '''49uL of NanoGlo Assay Buffer and 1uL of NanoGlo Assay Substrat''' were added.<br> | ||
− | + | The bioluminescence expressed in Relative Luminescence Units (RLU) were recorded in a black NUNC 96 wells plate.<br> | |
− | Two different bacterial cultures (sample) were assessed | + | Two different bacterial cultures (sample) were assessed per experiment in duplicate (except for the 24 hours condition).<br> |
− | Blank was done with non-transformed BTH101 (RLU = 300) and subtracted to each | + | Blank was done with non-transformed BTH101 (RLU = 300) and subtracted to each measurements.<br> |
==Results== | ==Results== | ||
Line 67: | Line 67: | ||
With this BioBrick it is then possible to see the difference between both condition: if the two sub-parts are close and if they are free and so tell if the theoretical target is present or not.<br> | With this BioBrick it is then possible to see the difference between both condition: if the two sub-parts are close and if they are free and so tell if the theoretical target is present or not.<br> | ||
In realist conditions the difference will probably not be as flagrant as here because the LZ system is more efficient to bring the parts together than the assay done with the target and aptamer ([https://2019.igem.org/Team:Grenoble-Alpes/Design see the full system]).<br> | In realist conditions the difference will probably not be as flagrant as here because the LZ system is more efficient to bring the parts together than the assay done with the target and aptamer ([https://2019.igem.org/Team:Grenoble-Alpes/Design see the full system]).<br> | ||
− | <i>* A T test was done and led to a p-value | + | <i>* A T test was done and led to a p-value < 0.05.</i><br> |
==User Reviews== | ==User Reviews== |
Revision as of 19:03, 15 October 2019
Contents
Team Grenoble Alpes 2019
Applications of BBa_K3128001
More information : Grenoble-Alpes 2019
Our detection system is based on the use of a BACTH. The point is to conditonally induce the expression of the gene upon interaction of the two sub-parts of Adenylate Cyclase (AC) are physically close, which only occurs when the target is present in the sample and detected by our NanoDrop system.
The re-constitution of AC then enables cAMP production, which will activate a CAP dependent promotor allowing the transcription of the downstream gene.
In order to perform the assay we needed to use an AC deficient bacteria strain (BTH101) that do not produce endogenic cAMP. This property prevents any transcription from CAP dependant promoter such as lactose promoter.
For the choice of the promoter, we decided to use the lactose promoter (a CAP dependent promoter) and we have demonstrated its repression in absence of cAMP (in the AC deficient bacterial strain), thus preventing any transcription of the following gene : the reporter one (see table and figure 1).
To resume, the expressed/overexpressed of the gene is under the control of cAMP For a good sensitivity of our system, statistically different signals have to be recorded on negative sample (no AC reconstitution) and positive sample (constitutive reconstitution of sub-parts of the AC).
To prove that the reporter gene efficiently works in our system different conditions were tested.
First the leak of our reporter in absence of cAMP was measured by transforming the plasmid containing the BioBrick PLac_NanoLuc in BTH101.
Then the free sub-parts condition was tested by co-transforming two plasmids in BTH101:
pUT18 containing the AC sub-part T18
and pKT25_NLuc containing both the AC sub-part T25 and the BioBrick PLac_NanoLuc.
At condition imitating the target's recognition was tested.
Leucine-Zipper (LZ) were used to mimic the presence of the target and the physical connexion between both sub-parts. LZ have the capacity to form homodimer and so were added at the end of both sub-parts making them able to stick to each other in absence of target thus restoring the AC activity.
Two plasmids were co-transformed in BTH101: pUT18-LZ containing the AC sub-part T18 fused with a LZ at the C terminal and pKT25-LZ_NLuc containing both the AC sub-part T25 fused with a LZ at the C terminal and the BioBrick PLac_NanoLuc.
If there is a significant difference of luminescence between the free sub-parts condition and the target detection imitating condition then it will demonstrate that our reporter gene is working in our system.
It will also show the cAMP dependent on/off transcription switch.
The assay
Bacterial culture were induced with 0.5mM of IPTG at an Optical Density of 0.6.
The subtract for Nano Luciferase (furimazine) was added as follow : for 50uL of bacterial culture in a well, 49uL of NanoGlo Assay Buffer and 1uL of NanoGlo Assay Substrat were added.
The bioluminescence expressed in Relative Luminescence Units (RLU) were recorded in a black NUNC 96 wells plate.
Two different bacterial cultures (sample) were assessed per experiment in duplicate (except for the 24 hours condition).
Blank was done with non-transformed BTH101 (RLU = 300) and subtracted to each measurements.
Results
The second well for sample 2 was removed because the assay substrate wasn’t added.
Conclusion
Figure 4 : Measurement of the Nano Luciferase assays of the 3 conditions.
Those measurements highlight two major things with our reporter Biobrick:
First, there is a luminescence gap between the assay without endogenous adenylate cyclase (grey) and with the free sub-parts (orange) which means that there is a leak of our reporter protein due to random occurrences between both T18 and T25.
However there is a significant* difference between the assay with or without LZ which means that, when the target is present and brings the two parts together, the gene (here Nano Luciferase) is overexpressed.
With this BioBrick it is then possible to see the difference between both condition: if the two sub-parts are close and if they are free and so tell if the theoretical target is present or not.
In realist conditions the difference will probably not be as flagrant as here because the LZ system is more efficient to bring the parts together than the assay done with the target and aptamer (see the full system).
* A T test was done and led to a p-value < 0.05.
User Reviews
UNIQ6a329270ee68c141-partinfo-00000000-QINU UNIQ6a329270ee68c141-partinfo-00000001-QINU