Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K1809035"
Kylie paige (Talk | contribs) |
Kylie paige (Talk | contribs) |
||
Line 75: | Line 75: | ||
IAFGP-Y showed no effect on biofilm formation. | IAFGP-Y showed no effect on biofilm formation. | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
Line 98: | Line 89: | ||
<!-- Add more about the biology of this part here | <!-- Add more about the biology of this part here | ||
===Usage and Biology=== | ===Usage and Biology=== | ||
+ | <center>https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/6/68/T--WPI_Worcester--COncentrationofProtein.png</center> | ||
+ | This graph shows the concentrations of purified proteins, including IAFGP, labeled as "IA" on the graph. | ||
+ | <center>https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/d/da/T--WPI_Worcester--CoatedPlates.png</center> | ||
+ | <center>https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/0/0e/T--WPI_Worcester--MixedPlate.png</center> | ||
+ | These are graphs of biofilm assays that included the protein IAFGP. The proteins were either mixed into the bacteria or it was used to coat the plate that the biofilm was going to be grown on. | ||
+ | |||
+ | <center>https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/b/bf/T--WPI_Worcester--Bioflim_Assay_Plate.png</center> | ||
+ | This is a graph of the biofilm production with and without the expression of different antifreeze proteins.The expression of these proteins was proven on the following gel: | ||
+ | <center>https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/7/70/T--WPI_Worcester--ProteinGel1.png</center> | ||
<!-- --> | <!-- --> | ||
<span class='h3bb'>Sequence and Features</span> | <span class='h3bb'>Sequence and Features</span> |
Revision as of 19:38, 17 October 2018
IAFGP
Antifreeze proteins (AFPs) are molecules with the unique property of binding and shaping ice crystals, preventing their growth into relatively large cell-lysing structures (Davies and Sykes 1997). They exhibit a property known as thermal hysteresis, whereby their activity decreases the freezing point of water without changing the melting point. This property allows organisms which produce AFPs to survive colder conditions. Additionally, an AFP from the deer tick Ixodes scapularis has been shown to have biofilm inhibiting properties, potentially giving these AFPs uses in both commercial and medical applications (Heisig et al. 2014).
We tested 16 different AFPs for both freeze survival and biofilm activity in two different constructs. The first construct simply expressed the antifreeze protein strongly, while the second construct included a BclA tag that caused the antifreeze protein to bind to the cell surface. This AFP, from the deer tick Ixodes scapularis (IAFGP), was the AFP shown in Heisig et al. to inhibit biofilm formation. During cloning, the tagged BclA-IAFGP construct was made, but two mutants of IAFGP were created in the untagged version, labeled here as IAFGP-X and IAFGP-Y.
To test freeze survival, a liquid culture of E. coli was grown up overnight and three samples were taken. An MTS assay was performed for the first sample to determine the amount of live E. coli present, while the other two samples were placed in a slow-freeze box at -20C and -80C respectively. After 24 hours MTS assays were then performed on these two samples to determine what percentage of cells survived the freezing.
BclA-IAFGP showed significant freeze survival compared to the control at both -20C and -80C.
IAFGP-X showed significant freeze survival compared to the control at both -20C and -80C.
IAFGP-Y showed significant freeze survival compared to the control at both -20C and -80C.
To test biofilm activity, each construct was transformed into the biofilm forming strain EMG2:Kλ E. coli and the strain was grown on a 96 well plate. Crystal violet was added to each well and washed, then acetic acid was used to break down the remaining crystal violet so that biofilm formation could be measured colorimetrically. These results were then normalized to an EMG2:Kλ without plasmid control.
BclA-IAFGP actually showed increased biofilm formation, contrary to Heisig et al.
IAFGP-X actually showed increased biofilm formation, contrary to Heisig et al.
IAFGP-Y showed no effect on biofilm formation.
References
Davies, P. L., and B. D. Sykes. 1997. Antifreeze proteins. (0959-440X (Print)).
Heisig, M., N. M. Abraham, L. Liu, G. Neelakanta, S. Mattessich, H. Sultana, Z. Shang, J. M. Ansari, C. Killiam, W. Walker, L. Cooley, R. A. Flavell, H. Agaisse, and E. Fikrig. 2014. Antivirulence properties of an antifreeze protein. (2211-1247 (Electronic)).
Sequence and Features
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
- 21COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
- 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
- 1000COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]