Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K2705000"

(References)
 
(9 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
<partinfo>BBa_K2705000 short</partinfo>
 
<partinfo>BBa_K2705000 short</partinfo>
  
This sequence includes the promoter(forward) of GltA/B(glutamate synthase) and the promoter(backward) of GltC(LysR family transcriptional regulator), GltC can bind specific DNA site on it and upregulate the expression of downstream proteins, and GltC is repressed by high level glutamate.
+
This sequence includes the promoter(forward) of gltA/B(glutamate synthase) and the promoter(backward) of gltC(LysR family transcriptional regulator). GltC can bind specific DNA site on it and upregulate the expression of downstream proteins, and GltC is repressed by high level glutamate.
  
 
<!-- Add more about the biology of this part here
 
<!-- Add more about the biology of this part here
Line 17: Line 17:
 
<partinfo>BBa_K2705000 parameters</partinfo>
 
<partinfo>BBa_K2705000 parameters</partinfo>
 
<!--TSI -->
 
<!--TSI -->
==Introduction==
 
===''Bacillus amyloliquefaciens'' LL3===
 
In our whole project, we chose the <i>B. amyloliquefaciens</i> LL3 as our genetically engineered microorganism (GEM), which is a glutamic acid- independent poly-γ-glutamic acid (γ-PGA)-producing strain isolated from traditional fermented food. According to previous studies, its pathway of synthesizing γ-PGA through <i>pgsBCA</i> did not rely on the exogenous glutamate, allowing it to synthesize γ-PGA normally on glutamate-free medium, where the glutamate- dependent ones can’t synthesize γ-PGA even with a high intracellular glutamate concentration.
 
  
===The regulation of GltAB===
 
<i>gltA</i> and <i>gltB</i> genes are organized as an operon, encoding glutamate synthase, a heterodimeric protein. Since glutamate is the most abundant anion in the cell, the expression of <i>gltA</i> with <i>gltB</i> is thought to be subject to nutritional regulation, it's no wonder that their Regulatory mechanism has been attracting more and more attention.<br>Scientists have found TnrA and GltC as regulators of GltAB. TnrA is active only under conditions of nitrogen limitation and inactive after interaction with a complex of glutamine synthetase and glutamine, it can repress <i>gltAB</i> expression by binding to the promoter region of <i>gltA</i>, however, even without TnrA, there is little expression of the GltAB operon unless GltC is active. GltC is a member of the LysR family of bacterial transcription factors which can activate transcription of GltA and GltB.
 
  
 +
==Background==
  
 +
===The introduction of LL3===
  
[[File:popQC function diagram.png|600px|center|thumb|'''Figure 1. An effective way for biosynthesis being more suitable for large-scale industrial production.''' Red squares represent high producers, yellow ones represent moderate producers, white ones represent low producers. With our effective system, high producers occupy a larger proportion in the population.]]
+
In our whole project, we chose the <i>B. amyloliquefaciens</i> LL3 as our genetically engineered microorganism (GEM), which is a glutamic acid- independent poly-&#947;- glutamic acid (&#947;- PGA)-producing strain isolated from traditional fermented food. According to previous studies, its pathway of synthesizing &#947;- PGA through <i>pgsBCA</i> did not rely on the exogenous glutamate, allowing it to synthesize &#947;- PGA normally on glutamate-free medium, where the glutamate- dependent ones can&#39;t synthesize &#947;- PGA even with a high intracellular glutamate concentration.
  
 +
===The regulation of GltAB===
  
 
+
The <i>gltA</i> and <i>gltB</i> genes are organized as an operon, encoding glutamate synthase, a heterodimeric protein. Since glutamate is the most abundant anion in the cell, the expression of <i>gltA</i> and <i>gltB</i> is thought to be subject to nutritional regulation. There’s no wonder that their regulatory mechanism has been attracting more and more attention.
In our work, promoter P<sub>''gltAB''</sub> [https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2705000 (BBa_K2705000)], promoter P<sub>''grac''</sub>[https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2705002 (BBa_K2705002)], ''lacI''[https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2705001 (BBa_K2705001)] gene and ''tetA''[https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2705003 (BBa_K2705003)] gene were composed to build up the system. (See '''Figure 2'''.)
+
<br>Scientists have found TnrA and GltC as regulators of GltAB. TnrA is active only under conditions of nitrogen limitation and inactive after interaction with a complex of glutamine synthetase and glutamine, it can repress <i>gltAB</i> expression by binding to the promoter region of <i>gltA</i>. However, even without TnrA, there is little expression of the GltAB operon unless GltC is active. GltC is a member of the LysR family of bacterial transcription factors which can activate transcription of <i>gltAB</i> .
 
+
 
+
[[File:construction regulation pathway.png|600px|center|thumb|'''Figure 2. High glutamate concentration ensures the individual to survive in tetracycline condition with PopQC system.''' High-producers will synthesize enough amount of tetracycline efflux pumps to maintain alive while low-producers are not be able to survive in tetracycline condiction.
+
]]
+
 
+
 
+
In ''Bacillus amyloliquefaciens'' LL3 exists the glt operon, which is responsible for intracellular glutamate synthesis (See [https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2705000 BBa_K2705000] for more details about P<sub>''gltAB''</sub>). TetA is a tetracycline resistance protein[TetA(C) inner-membrane-associated protein] (See [https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2705000 BBa_K2705007] and [https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2705003 BBa_K2705003] for more details about TetA). <br>
+
With a specific extracellular tetracycline concentration, when intracellular glutamate-precursor of γ-PGA-concentration of the individual is low, GltC level will go up, which activates the P<sub>''gltAB''</sub> to express ''lacI''. LacI furthermore represses P<sub>''grac''</sub> and as a result, represses ''tetA'' expression. On the contrary, for high-producers, the concentration of intracellular GltC will go down, which represses the P<sub>''gltAB''</sub> to express ''lacI'', and the ''tetA'' expression is not affected. Therefore, high-producers will synthesize enough amount of tetracycline efflux pumps to maintain alive while low-producers won’t be able to survive. Consequently, the average intracellular glutamate concentration among the population is enhanced, which will finally lead to γ-PGA yield enhancement in LL3.
+
  
 
==Proof of Function==
 
==Proof of Function==
Vector ''P<sub>gltAB</sub>-LacI-P<sub>grac</sub>-TetA'' was converted into LL3, and correct transformants were fermented in M9 culture medium with different extracellular glutamate concentrations (0, 2.5, 5 and 7.5 g/L). From the 6<sup>th</sup> hour, we tested bacteria with several assays every 3 hours. We chose LL3 δBAM strain as control system.
+
===Detection of <i>gltC</i> transcription level in LL3-P<sub><i>gltAB</i></sub>-GFP under different glutamate concentrations===
 
+
===Expression level of ''tetA'' by microplate assay===
+
 
+
To test the expression of ''tetA'', we tagged it with the fluorescent reporter GFP-coding gene [https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2705004 (BBa_K2705004)], whose expression can be detected by microplate assay (395nm\509nm). The intracellular glutamate concentration and bacteria concentration (OD<sub>600</sub>) were also examined, respectively. It can be concluded that with the increasing glutamate, ''tetA'' of PopQC was upregulated to express. (See '''Figure 3'''.) The results sugguests that the system can help individuals with higher intracellular glutamate concentration express more TetA, so that survive in tetracycline condition.
+
 
+
 
+
[[File:relation between intercellular glutamate and GFP.png|600px|center|thumb|'''Figure 3. The relationship of CIGA and GFP in Plateau stage.(CIGA: The concentration of intracellular glutamic acid;A.U.: Arbitrary Unit)'''With the increasing glutamate, tetA of PopQC was upregulated to express, which supports individuals with high glutamate concentration to survive in tetracycline condition. More than 5ml fermented liquid was analyzed per treatment. Error bars indicate and can show significant tendency. (P value < 0.005).
+
]]
+
 
+
 
+
===Transcription level of ''gltAB'', ''gltC'', ''lacI'' by qPCR===
+
Together with the microplate assay, total RNA of the bateria was extracted every 3 hours from the 6<sup>th</sup> hour. The transcription levels of ''gltAB'', ''gltC'' and ''lacI'' were tested by qPCR assays, and the relationship between intracellular glutamate concentration and transcription of these genes are analyzed. Xxx was chosen as the internal reference of qPCR assay. Primers used in the assays are listed in '''Table 1'''.
+
 
+
 
+
[[File:Primers used in qPCR essays.png|600px|center|thumb|'''Table 1. Primers used in qPCR essays.''']]
+
 
+
 
+
 
+
'''Figure 4a,c,e''' indicated that with higher intracellular glutamate concentration, less ''gltAB'', ''gltC'' and ''lacI'' of the circuit were expressed. '''Figure 4b,d''' also shows that in LL3 ΔBAM strain, ''gltC'' and ''gltAB'' were affected by diverse intracellular glutamate concentration, similar to LL3 ΔBAM strain with PopQC system. (See [https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2705003 BBa_K2705000] for more details about P<sub>''gltAB''</sub> functions)
+
 
+
 
+
[[File:figure4.png|600px|center|thumb|'''Figure 4. With higher intracellular glutamate concentration, transcription of gltC, gltAB and lacI are downregulated in logarithmic and plateau phases.''' a, c, e illustrate the transcription level of gltC, gltAB and lacI in LL3 ΔBAM strain with PopQC system. b, d show the effect of intracellular glutamate concentration on gltC and gltAB transcription. Records are from the logarithmic and plateau phases. R squares are shown on the graphs.]]
+
 
+
 
+
===Measurement of γ-PGA yield===
+
After 32 hours fermentation, the γ-PGA yield was tested. With PopQC system, LL3 ΔBAM strain produced more γ-PGA, which approved the system function. See '''Figure 5'''.
+
 
+
  
[[File:yield increasement.png|600px|center|thumb|'''Figure 5. γ-PGA yield is enhanced in LL3 ΔBAM strain with PopQC system comparing with the LL3 ΔBAM strain without it.''' 32 hours fermentation production of both strains is tested, PopQC system makes sense in yield enhancement.]]
+
LL3-P<sub><i>gltAB</i></sub>-GFP was cultured in M9 medium with different extracellular glutamate concentrations. From the 6th hour, we extracted the total RNA of LL3-P<sub><i>gltAB</i></sub>-GFP every 3 hours and tested the transcription of <i>gltC</i> together with the respective intracellular glutamate concentrations. Transcription level of <i>gltC</i> in plateau phase is shown in <strong>Fig. 1</strong>. It could be indicated that the transcription of <i>gltC</i> was repressed with the increasing intracellular glutamate concentration. Primers used in the assay are listed in <strong>Table 1</strong>.
  
 +
[[File: Fig. 1. The intracellular glutamate concentration and the relative expression level of gltC in LL3 with PgltAB-GFP in plateau stage.png|600px|center|thumb|''' <strong>Fig. 1. The intracellular glutamate concentration and the relative expression level of <i>gltC</i> in LL3 with P<sub><i>gltAB</i></sub>-GFP in plateau stage.</strong>''' <strong>a. The intracellular glutamate concentration of LL3 with P<sub><i>gltAB</i></sub>-GFP in plateau stage.</strong> *Significantly different (P &#60; 0.05) by Student&#39;s t-test. <strong>b. The relative expression level of <i>gltC</i> in plateau stage. </strong>The value illustrates the effect of glutamate concentration on the transcription of <i>gltC</i>. ***Very very significantly different (P &#60; 0.005) by Student &#39;s t-test. The strains were cultured at 37 &#176;C in M9 medium with 5 &#181;g/mL chloromycetin under different extracellular glutamate concentration (0 g/L, 2.5 g/L, 5.0 g/L) for 24 hours. Data indicate mean values &#177; standard deviations from three independent experiments performed in triplicates.]]
  
==References==
+
[[File: primers.png|600px|center|thumb|]]
<small>[1] Weitao G, Mingfeng C, Cunjiang S et al. Complete Genome Sequence of <i>Bacillus amyloliquefaciens</i> LL3, Which Exhibits Glutamic Acid-Independent Production of Poly-γ-Glutamic Acid. J Bacteriol. 2011 Jul; 193(13): 3393–3394.  
+
===GFP fluorescent intensity (FI) reports the P<sub><i>gltAB</i></sub> function===
 +
P<sub><i>gltAB</i></sub>-GFP and P<sub>43</sub>-GFP were converted into both <i>B. amyloliquefaciens</i> LL3 &#916; <i>bam</i> and <i>B. amyloliquefaciens</i> LL3 &#916; <i>bam</i> -<i>icd</i> strain (with stronger promoter before <i>icd</i> gene), which were designated as LL3-PgltAB-GFP and LL3-icd-PgltAB-GFP respectively. The two mutants were cultured in M9 culture medium for 24 hours. If needed the medium was supplemented with antibiotics or glutamate at the following concentrations: 5 &#181;g/mL chloramphenicol, 0 g/L, 0.5 g/L, 1.0 g/L, 2.5 g/L or 5.0 g/L glutamate. During the fermentation, 1.5mL bacteria culture was taken out every 3 hours, of which 600&#181;L was for GFP FI measurement (395nm\509nm) by microplate reader, and 900&#181;L for OD<sub>600</sub> measurement.
 +
With the extracellular glutamate concentration increasing, the FI of GFP was decreasing, which means higher glutamate concentration can indeed repress the promoter P<sub><i>gltAB</i></sub>&#39;s effect. The FI first rose and then fell, which may due to the extra glutamate adding that can promote cell growth. (<strong>Fig. 2 and Fig. 3</strong>.)
  
[2] Picossi S, Belitsky B R, Sonenshein A L. Molecular mechanism of the regulation of <i>Bacillus subtilis gltAB</i> expression by GltC[J]. J Mol Biol., 2007, 365(5):1298-1313.
+
[[File: Fig.2 Principle for detecting the PgltAB function.png|600px|center|thumb|''' <strong>Fig.2 Principle for detecting the P<sub><i>gltAB</i></sub> function.</strong>''' Under high glutamate concentration, GltC level goes down, reducing the level of GFP. ]]
  
[3] Commichau FM, Herzberg C, Tripal P et al. A regulatory protein-protein interaction governs glutamate biosynthesis in <i>Bacillus subtilis</i>: the glutamate dehydrogenase RocG moonlights in controlling the transcription factor GltC. Mol Microbiol. 2007 Aug;65(3):642-654.
+
[[File: Fig.3 FI of GFP in LL3-PgltAB-GFP and LL3–icd-PgltAB-GFP under different extracellular glutamate concentrations in plateau stage.png|600px|center|thumb|''' <strong>Fig.3 FI of GFP in LL3-P<sub><i>gltAB</i></sub>-GFP and LL3–<i>icd</i>-P<sub><i>gltAB</i></sub>-GFP under different extracellular glutamate concentrations in plateau stage.</strong>''' <strong>a. The intracellular glutamate concentration under different extracellular glutamate concentrations in plateau stage.</strong> The value illustrates the relationship between glutamate concentration in medium and intracellular glutamate concentration. *Significantly different (P &#60; 0.05) by Student&#39;s t-test. <strong>b. FI of GFP in LL3-P<sub><i>gltAB</i></sub>-GFP under different extracellular glutamate concentrations in plateau stage.</strong> **Very significantly different (P &#60; 0.01) by Student&#39;s t-test. <strong>c. FI of GFP in LL3-<i>icd</i>-P<sub><i>gltAB</i></sub>-GFP under different extracellular glutamate concentrations in plateau stage.</strong> *** Very very significantly different (P &#60; 0.005) by Student&#39;s t-test. The strains were cultured at 37 &#176;C in M9 medium with 5 &#181;g/mL chloromycetin for 24 hours under different extracellular glutamate concentration (0 g/L, 0.5 g/L, 1.0 g/L, 2.5 g/L, 5.0 g/L). Intracellular glutamate concentration, fluorescence intensity of GFP and the OD<sub>600</sub> were measured. FI of GFP was normalized against OD<sub>600</sub>. Data indicate mean values &#177; standard deviations from three independent experiments performed in triplicates. ]]
  
[4] Bohannon D E and Sonenshein A L. Positive regulation of glutamate biosynthesis in <i>Bacillus subtilis</i>. J Bacteriol. 1989 Sep; 171(9): 4718–4727.</small>
+
==Reference==
 +
Weitao G, Mingfeng C, Cunjiang S <i>et al.</i> Complete genome sequence of <i>Bacillus amyloliquefaciens</i> LL3, which exhibits glutamic acid-independent production of poly-&#947;-glutamic acid. J Bacteriol. 2011, 193(13): 3393–3394.
 +
Picossi S, Belitsky B R, Sonenshein A L. Molecular mechanism of the regulation of <i>Bacillus subtilis gltAB</i> expression by GltC[J]. J Mol Biol., 2007, 365(5):1298-1313.
 +
<br>Commichau FM, Herzberg C, Tripal P <i>et al.</i> A regulatory protein-protein interaction governs glutamate biosynthesis in <i>Bacillus subtilis</i>: the glutamate dehydrogenase RocG moonlights in controlling the transcription factor GltC. Mol Microbiol. 2007, 65(3):642-654.
 +
<br>Bohannon D E and Sonenshein A L. Positive regulation of glutamate biosynthesis in <i>Bacillus subtilis</i>. J Bacteriol. 1989, 171(9): 4718–4727.

Latest revision as of 17:14, 17 October 2018


PgltAB

This sequence includes the promoter(forward) of gltA/B(glutamate synthase) and the promoter(backward) of gltC(LysR family transcriptional regulator). GltC can bind specific DNA site on it and upregulate the expression of downstream proteins, and GltC is repressed by high level glutamate.

Sequence and Features


Assembly Compatibility:
  • 10
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
  • 12
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
  • 21
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
  • 23
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
  • 25
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
  • 1000
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]



Background

The introduction of LL3

In our whole project, we chose the B. amyloliquefaciens LL3 as our genetically engineered microorganism (GEM), which is a glutamic acid- independent poly-γ- glutamic acid (γ- PGA)-producing strain isolated from traditional fermented food. According to previous studies, its pathway of synthesizing γ- PGA through pgsBCA did not rely on the exogenous glutamate, allowing it to synthesize γ- PGA normally on glutamate-free medium, where the glutamate- dependent ones can't synthesize γ- PGA even with a high intracellular glutamate concentration.

The regulation of GltAB

The gltA and gltB genes are organized as an operon, encoding glutamate synthase, a heterodimeric protein. Since glutamate is the most abundant anion in the cell, the expression of gltA and gltB is thought to be subject to nutritional regulation. There’s no wonder that their regulatory mechanism has been attracting more and more attention.
Scientists have found TnrA and GltC as regulators of GltAB. TnrA is active only under conditions of nitrogen limitation and inactive after interaction with a complex of glutamine synthetase and glutamine, it can repress gltAB expression by binding to the promoter region of gltA. However, even without TnrA, there is little expression of the GltAB operon unless GltC is active. GltC is a member of the LysR family of bacterial transcription factors which can activate transcription of gltAB .

Proof of Function

Detection of gltC transcription level in LL3-PgltAB-GFP under different glutamate concentrations

LL3-PgltAB-GFP was cultured in M9 medium with different extracellular glutamate concentrations. From the 6th hour, we extracted the total RNA of LL3-PgltAB-GFP every 3 hours and tested the transcription of gltC together with the respective intracellular glutamate concentrations. Transcription level of gltC in plateau phase is shown in Fig. 1. It could be indicated that the transcription of gltC was repressed with the increasing intracellular glutamate concentration. Primers used in the assay are listed in Table 1.

Fig. 1. The intracellular glutamate concentration and the relative expression level of gltC in LL3 with PgltAB-GFP in plateau stage. a. The intracellular glutamate concentration of LL3 with PgltAB-GFP in plateau stage. *Significantly different (P < 0.05) by Student's t-test. b. The relative expression level of gltC in plateau stage. The value illustrates the effect of glutamate concentration on the transcription of gltC. ***Very very significantly different (P < 0.005) by Student 's t-test. The strains were cultured at 37 °C in M9 medium with 5 µg/mL chloromycetin under different extracellular glutamate concentration (0 g/L, 2.5 g/L, 5.0 g/L) for 24 hours. Data indicate mean values ± standard deviations from three independent experiments performed in triplicates.
Primers.png

GFP fluorescent intensity (FI) reports the PgltAB function

PgltAB-GFP and P43-GFP were converted into both B. amyloliquefaciens LL3 Δ bam and B. amyloliquefaciens LL3 Δ bam -icd strain (with stronger promoter before icd gene), which were designated as LL3-PgltAB-GFP and LL3-icd-PgltAB-GFP respectively. The two mutants were cultured in M9 culture medium for 24 hours. If needed the medium was supplemented with antibiotics or glutamate at the following concentrations: 5 µg/mL chloramphenicol, 0 g/L, 0.5 g/L, 1.0 g/L, 2.5 g/L or 5.0 g/L glutamate. During the fermentation, 1.5mL bacteria culture was taken out every 3 hours, of which 600µL was for GFP FI measurement (395nm\509nm) by microplate reader, and 900µL for OD600 measurement. With the extracellular glutamate concentration increasing, the FI of GFP was decreasing, which means higher glutamate concentration can indeed repress the promoter PgltAB's effect. The FI first rose and then fell, which may due to the extra glutamate adding that can promote cell growth. (Fig. 2 and Fig. 3.)

Fig.2 Principle for detecting the PgltAB function. Under high glutamate concentration, GltC level goes down, reducing the level of GFP.
Fig.3 FI of GFP in LL3-PgltAB-GFP and LL3–icd-PgltAB-GFP under different extracellular glutamate concentrations in plateau stage. a. The intracellular glutamate concentration under different extracellular glutamate concentrations in plateau stage. The value illustrates the relationship between glutamate concentration in medium and intracellular glutamate concentration. *Significantly different (P < 0.05) by Student's t-test. b. FI of GFP in LL3-PgltAB-GFP under different extracellular glutamate concentrations in plateau stage. **Very significantly different (P < 0.01) by Student's t-test. c. FI of GFP in LL3-icd-PgltAB-GFP under different extracellular glutamate concentrations in plateau stage. *** Very very significantly different (P < 0.005) by Student's t-test. The strains were cultured at 37 °C in M9 medium with 5 µg/mL chloromycetin for 24 hours under different extracellular glutamate concentration (0 g/L, 0.5 g/L, 1.0 g/L, 2.5 g/L, 5.0 g/L). Intracellular glutamate concentration, fluorescence intensity of GFP and the OD600 were measured. FI of GFP was normalized against OD600. Data indicate mean values ± standard deviations from three independent experiments performed in triplicates.

Reference

Weitao G, Mingfeng C, Cunjiang S et al. Complete genome sequence of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens LL3, which exhibits glutamic acid-independent production of poly-γ-glutamic acid. J Bacteriol. 2011, 193(13): 3393–3394. Picossi S, Belitsky B R, Sonenshein A L. Molecular mechanism of the regulation of Bacillus subtilis gltAB expression by GltC[J]. J Mol Biol., 2007, 365(5):1298-1313.
Commichau FM, Herzberg C, Tripal P et al. A regulatory protein-protein interaction governs glutamate biosynthesis in Bacillus subtilis: the glutamate dehydrogenase RocG moonlights in controlling the transcription factor GltC. Mol Microbiol. 2007, 65(3):642-654.
Bohannon D E and Sonenshein A L. Positive regulation of glutamate biosynthesis in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol. 1989, 171(9): 4718–4727.