Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K1893019"

Line 18: Line 18:
  
 
Colonies of <i>E. coli</i> transformed with gp2 constructs appeared to be irregular and smaller in size than wildtype <i>E. coli</i> colonies, even when the gp2 sequence was not prefaced by an active promoter. This could suggest leaky expression of the gp2 coding sequence in <i>E. coli</i>.
 
Colonies of <i>E. coli</i> transformed with gp2 constructs appeared to be irregular and smaller in size than wildtype <i>E. coli</i> colonies, even when the gp2 sequence was not prefaced by an active promoter. This could suggest leaky expression of the gp2 coding sequence in <i>E. coli</i>.
 +
 +
===Characterisation (Imperial College 2018)===
 +
In order to test our PixCell electrogenetic part library we constructed a biocontainment device to prototype one of our proposed applications. This was constructed using an existing part in the iGEM registry: the growth inhibitor Gp2. By placing this downstream of pSoxS (BBa_K2862006) and expressing SoxR (BBa_K2862014) from a constitutive promoter (BBa_K2862019) we could inhibit cell growth in the oxidising conditions we produced from our electrochemical set up. We envisioned this being used with our array in a biocontainment device in which any cells that spread to the edges of the device have their growth seized by an oxidising potential. This device could be used to prevent the accidental release of GMOs, much like how electric fences are used to restrain animals.
 +
 +
Fig X: Gp2 construct diagram
 +
 +
This application construct and a control replacing GP2 with GFP were grown in both the reducing OFF condition (2.5μM pyocyanin, 0.02% sodium sulfite, 10mM ferrocyanide) and the oxidising (ON) condition (2.5μM pyocyanin, 0.02% sodium sulfite, 10mM ferricyanide) of our electrogenetic system. The Gp2 construct shows a significant decrease in the maximum achievable growth rate in the oxidising condition.
 +
 +
Fig X: Gp2 Test growth curves
 +
 +
In comparison no significant difference is seen in these conditions with the control construct.
 +
 +
Fig X: Gp2 control growth curves
 +
 +
When looking at the steady state OD600 values of these a clear significant ~2-fold reduction is seen in the application construct in oxidising conditions. Furthermore there is no difference between the growth of the reducing condition and the controls. This not only provides a proof-of concept for out application, but also proves the system is not significantly leaky. This means it is feasible to use a higher copy number plasmid or more toxic gene (such as MazF) in this device to provide an even more effective biocontainment device.
 +
 +
Fig X: Gp2 bar chart
  
  

Revision as of 07:32, 17 October 2018


T7 phage gene product 2 (Gp2)

The T7 phage is a bacteriophage that infects Escherichia coli and leads to cell lysis of the host. It is also the source of the T7 promoter, which is commonly used in synthetic biology with T7 RNA polymerase for tight control of gene expression. Infection by T7 phase is facilitated by a number of viral genes encoded in its 40kb T7 genome, including gene product 2.

Usage and Biology

Gene product 2 (gp2) is a small 7 kDA protein that plays a key role in the late stages of T7 phage infection. It binds to the β’ subunit of RNA polymerase (RNAP) in the E. coli host, which inhibits host transcription by preventing formation of the active RNAP holoenzyme. This allows the phage-encoded RNAP to transcribe the phage proteins required for successful infection without interference from the host transcriptional machinery. An additional effect of inhibited host transcription is a decrease in the growth rate of the host.


We selected gp2 as a candidate for the growth-regulation module of our GEAR system for its ability to inhibit growth without causing cell death. gp2 also allows for growth inhibition without the need to manipulate growth media or generate knockout strains, unlike some of the other candidates we had considered.

Characterisation

In order to investigate the effect of gp2 on E. coli growth, we placed the gp2 coding sequence under the control of an arabinose-inducible promoter (BBa_K1893015) and characterised cell growth at varying levels of gp2 expression. The results of these experiments can be found here (BBa_K1893016).


Colonies of E. coli transformed with gp2 constructs appeared to be irregular and smaller in size than wildtype E. coli colonies, even when the gp2 sequence was not prefaced by an active promoter. This could suggest leaky expression of the gp2 coding sequence in E. coli.

Characterisation (Imperial College 2018)

In order to test our PixCell electrogenetic part library we constructed a biocontainment device to prototype one of our proposed applications. This was constructed using an existing part in the iGEM registry: the growth inhibitor Gp2. By placing this downstream of pSoxS (BBa_K2862006) and expressing SoxR (BBa_K2862014) from a constitutive promoter (BBa_K2862019) we could inhibit cell growth in the oxidising conditions we produced from our electrochemical set up. We envisioned this being used with our array in a biocontainment device in which any cells that spread to the edges of the device have their growth seized by an oxidising potential. This device could be used to prevent the accidental release of GMOs, much like how electric fences are used to restrain animals.

Fig X: Gp2 construct diagram

This application construct and a control replacing GP2 with GFP were grown in both the reducing OFF condition (2.5μM pyocyanin, 0.02% sodium sulfite, 10mM ferrocyanide) and the oxidising (ON) condition (2.5μM pyocyanin, 0.02% sodium sulfite, 10mM ferricyanide) of our electrogenetic system. The Gp2 construct shows a significant decrease in the maximum achievable growth rate in the oxidising condition.

Fig X: Gp2 Test growth curves

In comparison no significant difference is seen in these conditions with the control construct.

Fig X: Gp2 control growth curves

When looking at the steady state OD600 values of these a clear significant ~2-fold reduction is seen in the application construct in oxidising conditions. Furthermore there is no difference between the growth of the reducing condition and the controls. This not only provides a proof-of concept for out application, but also proves the system is not significantly leaky. This means it is feasible to use a higher copy number plasmid or more toxic gene (such as MazF) in this device to provide an even more effective biocontainment device.

Fig X: Gp2 bar chart


Sequence and Features


Assembly Compatibility:
  • 10
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
  • 12
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
  • 21
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
  • 23
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
  • 25
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
  • 1000
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]
    Illegal BsaI.rc site found at 118