Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K2788010"
Wulianthony (Talk | contribs) (→iGEM2018 SZU-China) |
(→iGEM2018 SZU-China) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
The HsbA from Beauveria bassiana encodes a kind of membrane surface hydrophobic protein which helps our spores adhere to the wax on the cockroach body surface. Moreover, with the overexpression of HsbA, our spores can more effectively adhere to the cockroach. Then it will follow as spores’ germination, germinal tube, appressorium and the next penetrating process. | The HsbA from Beauveria bassiana encodes a kind of membrane surface hydrophobic protein which helps our spores adhere to the wax on the cockroach body surface. Moreover, with the overexpression of HsbA, our spores can more effectively adhere to the cockroach. Then it will follow as spores’ germination, germinal tube, appressorium and the next penetrating process. | ||
− | This | + | This part was inserted into the expression vector by restriction sites EcoRI and PstI (Fig.1), and the correct construction of this recombinant plasmid was confirmed by PCR identification and sequencing of the PCR products. |
<div> | <div> | ||
<center><html><img src='https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/a/ad/T--SZU-China--Result_1.png' style="width:60%;margin:0 auto"> | <center><html><img src='https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/a/ad/T--SZU-China--Result_1.png' style="width:60%;margin:0 auto"> | ||
<center>Fig.1 Construction of expression vector HsbA-pBC. PgpdA and TtrpC come from parts of 2016_NYMU-Taipei: BBa_K2040101 and BBa_K2040102, and HsbA comes from the Beauveria bassiana ARSEF 2860. The PgpdA-HsbA-TtrpC part is connected to the pBC plasmid through the BioBrick site.</center></html></center> | <center>Fig.1 Construction of expression vector HsbA-pBC. PgpdA and TtrpC come from parts of 2016_NYMU-Taipei: BBa_K2040101 and BBa_K2040102, and HsbA comes from the Beauveria bassiana ARSEF 2860. The PgpdA-HsbA-TtrpC part is connected to the pBC plasmid through the BioBrick site.</center></html></center> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
+ | |||
We transformed the expression vectors into Metarhizium anisopliae 128 by the method of Xiaoling Wang, and the positive clone was confirmed by G418 sulfate screening and nucleic acid electrophoresis.(Fig.2) | We transformed the expression vectors into Metarhizium anisopliae 128 by the method of Xiaoling Wang, and the positive clone was confirmed by G418 sulfate screening and nucleic acid electrophoresis.(Fig.2) | ||
<div> | <div> | ||
<center><html><img src='https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/f/f2/T--SZU-China--Result_2.jpg' style="width:20%;margin:0 auto"> | <center><html><img src='https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/f/f2/T--SZU-China--Result_2.jpg' style="width:20%;margin:0 auto"> | ||
− | <center>Fig.2 0.8%Agarose Gel Electrophoresis of DNA extracted from the positive clones and its | + | <center>Fig.2 0.8%Agarose Gel Electrophoresis of DNA extracted from the positive clones and its validated by PCR. The product of plasmid digested showed two signal bands at 335 bp and 741bp respectively, which correspond to the length of M.a primer PCR product and HsbA primer PCR product. Lane 1: M.a primer PCR product; Lane 2: HsbA primer PCR product; Lane M: DL marker.</center></html></center> |
</div> | </div> | ||
+ | |||
The transformed strain Metarhizium anisopliae 128 was grown in 1/4 SDAY liquid medium, and obtain total protein by FastPrep and ultrasonic crushing. The lysate was then centrifuged and the supernate was electrophoresed on a sodium dodecyl sulfate(SDS)-12% (wt/vol) polyacrylamide gel, followed by Coomassie blue staining.(Fig.3) | The transformed strain Metarhizium anisopliae 128 was grown in 1/4 SDAY liquid medium, and obtain total protein by FastPrep and ultrasonic crushing. The lysate was then centrifuged and the supernate was electrophoresed on a sodium dodecyl sulfate(SDS)-12% (wt/vol) polyacrylamide gel, followed by Coomassie blue staining.(Fig.3) | ||
Line 38: | Line 40: | ||
<center>Fig.3 SDS-PAGE analysis of membrane protein of wild-type Metarhizium anisopliae 128 and modified Metarhizium anisopliae 128. Lane M: Marker Ladder;Lane 128:Metarhizium anisopliae 128;Lane HsbA1 and HsbA2: recombinant strain Metarhizium anisopliae 128. Lane HsbA1 and HsbA2 showed the same band(in red box) corresponded with the molecular weight of HsbA(24kDa).</center></html></center> | <center>Fig.3 SDS-PAGE analysis of membrane protein of wild-type Metarhizium anisopliae 128 and modified Metarhizium anisopliae 128. Lane M: Marker Ladder;Lane 128:Metarhizium anisopliae 128;Lane HsbA1 and HsbA2: recombinant strain Metarhizium anisopliae 128. Lane HsbA1 and HsbA2 showed the same band(in red box) corresponded with the molecular weight of HsbA(24kDa).</center></html></center> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
+ | |||
Besides, by using the method of compared four areas of each wing in the scanning electron microscope before and after treatment which is ‘put the petri dishes on WD-9405B horizontal shaking table and opened the lowest rolling speed for 10min (to make the spores on the wings evenly impacted by the water flow)’ in the HsbA macro verification protocol, we can finally compared whether there was any change in the position and number of spores in the observing area. (illustrated with Fig.4 and Fig.5) | Besides, by using the method of compared four areas of each wing in the scanning electron microscope before and after treatment which is ‘put the petri dishes on WD-9405B horizontal shaking table and opened the lowest rolling speed for 10min (to make the spores on the wings evenly impacted by the water flow)’ in the HsbA macro verification protocol, we can finally compared whether there was any change in the position and number of spores in the observing area. (illustrated with Fig.4 and Fig.5) | ||
+ | <div> | ||
+ | <center><html><img src='https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/5/5f/T--SZU-China--Result_4.png' style="width:60%;margin:0 auto"> | ||
+ | <center>Fig.4 One of the wild-type Metarhizium anisopliae 128 groups: P1 is the picture before treated and P2 is the picture after treated. The spores quantity is 40 in P1 and 102 in P2. And there are only two left that have not been washed away and moved. The adherence rate is 2/40=5.0%</center></html></center> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | It’s obvious that it happens great change(circle in red)in the position and number of spores in the observing area of wild-type Metarhizium anisopliae 128 experimental groups. | ||
+ | <div> | ||
+ | <center><html><img src='https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/2/23/T--SZU-China--Result_5.png' style="width:60%;margin:0 auto"> | ||
+ | <center>Fig.5 One of the Metarhizium anisopliae HsbA transformant groups: P3 is the picture before treated and P4 is the picture after treated. The spores quantity is 42 in P3 and 52 in P4. And there are 41 spores left that have not been washed away and moved. The adherence rate is 41/42=97.6%</center></html></center> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | It’s obvious that it almost happens no change except the place (circled in red) in the position and number of spores in the observing area of Metarhizium anisopliae HsbA transformant experimental groups. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Finally, the following chart (Fig.6) can be obtained by statistical data of four areas in all experimental groups. | ||
+ | <div> | ||
+ | <center><html><img src='https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/e/e3/T--SZU-China--Result_12.jpg' style="width:60%;margin:0 auto"> | ||
+ | <center>Fig.6 M.a128 is the wild-type Metarhizium anisopliae 128 groups, and the adherence rate in average is 26.7%. HsbA is the Metarhizium anisopliae 128 HsbA transformant groups, and the adherence rate in average is 97.7%.</center></html></center> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | In conclusion, this result well confirmed that Metarhizium anisopliae HsbA transformant certainly enhanced the capacity of adhesion. |
Latest revision as of 23:21, 16 October 2018
PgpdA-HsbA-TtrpC
This part consists of three basic parts that can be directly linked to the fungal expression vector which can express in our fungus.
Sequence and Features
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]Illegal NheI site found at 903
Illegal NheI site found at 2993 - 21INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]Illegal BglII site found at 137
Illegal BamHI site found at 3059
Illegal XhoI site found at 693
Illegal XhoI site found at 1075 - 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]Illegal NgoMIV site found at 2553
Illegal NgoMIV site found at 3695
Illegal AgeI site found at 1282
Illegal AgeI site found at 1430 - 1000INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]Illegal BsaI.rc site found at 1109
Illegal BsaI.rc site found at 3409
Illegal SapI site found at 315
iGEM2018 SZU-China
The HsbA from Beauveria bassiana encodes a kind of membrane surface hydrophobic protein which helps our spores adhere to the wax on the cockroach body surface. Moreover, with the overexpression of HsbA, our spores can more effectively adhere to the cockroach. Then it will follow as spores’ germination, germinal tube, appressorium and the next penetrating process.
This part was inserted into the expression vector by restriction sites EcoRI and PstI (Fig.1), and the correct construction of this recombinant plasmid was confirmed by PCR identification and sequencing of the PCR products.
We transformed the expression vectors into Metarhizium anisopliae 128 by the method of Xiaoling Wang, and the positive clone was confirmed by G418 sulfate screening and nucleic acid electrophoresis.(Fig.2)
The transformed strain Metarhizium anisopliae 128 was grown in 1/4 SDAY liquid medium, and obtain total protein by FastPrep and ultrasonic crushing. The lysate was then centrifuged and the supernate was electrophoresed on a sodium dodecyl sulfate(SDS)-12% (wt/vol) polyacrylamide gel, followed by Coomassie blue staining.(Fig.3)
Besides, by using the method of compared four areas of each wing in the scanning electron microscope before and after treatment which is ‘put the petri dishes on WD-9405B horizontal shaking table and opened the lowest rolling speed for 10min (to make the spores on the wings evenly impacted by the water flow)’ in the HsbA macro verification protocol, we can finally compared whether there was any change in the position and number of spores in the observing area. (illustrated with Fig.4 and Fig.5)
It’s obvious that it happens great change(circle in red)in the position and number of spores in the observing area of wild-type Metarhizium anisopliae 128 experimental groups.
It’s obvious that it almost happens no change except the place (circled in red) in the position and number of spores in the observing area of Metarhizium anisopliae HsbA transformant experimental groups.
Finally, the following chart (Fig.6) can be obtained by statistical data of four areas in all experimental groups.
In conclusion, this result well confirmed that Metarhizium anisopliae HsbA transformant certainly enhanced the capacity of adhesion.