Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K2669000:Experience"

m
m
Line 11: Line 11:
  
  
−
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/thumb/6/68/T--Uppsala--UnaG_Comparison_PreLysis.png/800px-T--Uppsala--UnaG_Comparison_PreLysis.png" width="200" height="40" alt="UnaG Comparison">
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/thumb/6/68/T--Uppsala--UnaG_Comparison_PreLysis.png/800px-T--Uppsala--UnaG_Comparison_PreLysis.png" width="400" height="200" alt="UnaG Comparison">
  
 
<p><b><Figure 1:</b> Bilirubin test of cells before lysis.   
 
<p><b><Figure 1:</b> Bilirubin test of cells before lysis.   

Revision as of 11:59, 30 September 2018

This experience page is provided so that any user may enter their experience using this part.
Please enter how you used this part and how it worked out.


Applications of BBa_K2669000

iGEM Uppsala 2018 Experience

After transforming our cells with a low copy amplicilin plasmid containing this composite part, cell lysis and affinity chromotography were used to extract UnaG from our cells. Please note: The exact procedure can be found at the end of our UnaG wiki page. Conducting "bilirubin tests" (the addition of a small amount of bilirubin dissolved in chloroform to samples) allowed us to see if UnaG was present in our samples, since as mentioned earlier UnaG fluoresces in the presence of bilirubin.

UnaG Comparison

Bilirubin test of cells before lysis.
  • Lb + bilirubin/chloroform solution
  • Lb culture of cells transformed with [[Part:BBa K2669000]] + bilirubin/chloroform solution
  • LB culture of cells transformed with [[Part:BBa K2003011]] + bilirubin/chloroform solution
  • LB culture of cells transformed with[[Part:BBa K2669000]] without bilirubin

UnaG Comparison

Figure 2: Bilirubin test before/after affinity chromatography. Going from right to left the samples are:

  • Lysed sample of the “bad” part before AC
  • Lysed sample of the “good” part before AC
  • "Bad" part after AC
  • "Good" part after AC

Figure 3: Comparison of blank tube to successful extraction/previous iGEM part. The tubes reading from left to right are as followed:

  • Blank tube with AC elution buffer/bilirubin
  • Tube with bilirubin + original iGEM UnaG part
  • Our extracted modified UnaG with a moved start codon, as can be seen in Figure 1

A good degree of fluorescence can be seen in the last tube compared to the other two, which clearly contain none of our protein of interest.

Figure 4: SDS-PAGE gel after affinity chromatography

UnaG is approximately 15.6 kDa, showing that it is indeed in the extracted sample. Other proteins are shown, and this is likely because we used no imidazole in the initial running buffer, leading to unspecific binding. We did this to ensure that we obtained as much UnaG as possible in our sample so that we could conduct fluorescence tests visible by the naked eye.

Conclusion

The histidine tag, in addition to the amount of UnaG produced seem to be sufficient to both extract the protein of interest and to observe its florescence both when cells are lysed and when they are intact.

User Reviews

UNIQ25097182e1aded47-partinfo-00000001-QINU UNIQ25097182e1aded47-partinfo-00000002-QINU