Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K2510023"
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
− | <!-- Add more about the biology of this part here | + | <!-- Add more about the biology of this part here--> |
===Usage and Biology=== | ===Usage and Biology=== | ||
+ | <html>This dually repressible promoter allows for the creation of a logic-gate, specifically a NOR-Gate. Indeed, gene expression will occur only when the two repressor are either expressed but non-functioning or absent from the system altogether. To design such a promoter, we combined insulated promoter that had been previously tested to form repressible promoter to create new dually repressible promoters that can be used to form a logic gate. | ||
+ | |||
+ | The promoter was tested both <i>in vivo</i> and in a cell-free environment using repressors that were caged with a photoswitchable fluorescent protein. | ||
+ | |||
+ | <h3><i>In vivo</i>Testing</h3> | ||
+ | Promoters were tested in vivo in 3 different strains of <i>E. coli</i>. | ||
+ | The results show that the system is not as efficient as it could be, and insularity of promoter elements is still a long way off. | ||
+ | |||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/f/fd/FACS_analysis_PB.png"><span><b>Figure 5</b>: Data obtained from flow cytometry experiments. The number showed is the mean of medians for 3 different experiments. | ||
+ | |||
+ | <h3>Cell-free testing</h3> | ||
+ | <P> This synthetic operator was part of the library that we used to test the activity of repressors caged with Dronpa </p> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/b/b1/96_conditions.png"> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <b>Figure 1 : </b> the experiment conducted with the repressors caged with Dronpa | ||
+ | |||
+ | </span> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/7/7d/Repression_strength_of_closed_state.png "> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <b>Figure 2 : </b> An over view of the results of the cell-free experiment. Each | ||
+ | promoter was tested with its cognate repressors. Our results show that in 90% of our | ||
+ | constructs caging the repressors with Dronpa has increased the repression strength. | ||
+ | We have also obtained a wide linear range of repression strength-indicated by the red | ||
+ | slope-. | ||
+ | </span> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/2/22/TetR_dronpa.png"> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/e/ed/P22c2_dronpa.png"> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/5/5e/HKCI_caged_dronpa.png"> | ||
+ | <span class="image-span text-center"> | ||
+ | <b>Figure 3:</b> detailed Results of the cell-free experiment. Each promoter was | ||
+ | tested with its cognate repressors. <b>Top</b>: Testing with TetR caged with | ||
+ | either wt-Dronpa (BBa_K2510108) or a mutated version(BBa_K2510109)<b>Middle</b>: | ||
+ | Testing with P22c2 caged with either wt-Dronpa (BBa_K2510112) or a mutated | ||
+ | version(BBa_K2510113).<b>Bottom</b>: Testing with HKcI caged with either wt- | ||
+ | Dronpa (BBa_K2510110) or a mutated version(BBa_K2510111) </span> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/5/5f/Wtvs_mut_repressors.png" > | ||
+ | <b>Figure 4:</b> the wtDronpa has a better control of HKC1 and C2P22 repressors while the mutDronpa has a better control of TetR repressors </span> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
<!-- --> | <!-- --> |
Latest revision as of 03:53, 16 December 2017
T7 - O-TetR - O-P22c2 promoter
This promoter is a dually repressible promoter.
Usage and Biology
This dually repressible promoter allows for the creation of a logic-gate, specifically a NOR-Gate. Indeed, gene expression will occur only when the two repressor are either expressed but non-functioning or absent from the system altogether. To design such a promoter, we combined insulated promoter that had been previously tested to form repressible promoter to create new dually repressible promoters that can be used to form a logic gate. The promoter was tested both in vivo and in a cell-free environment using repressors that were caged with a photoswitchable fluorescent protein.
In vivoTesting
Promoters were tested in vivo in 3 different strains of E. coli. The results show that the system is not as efficient as it could be, and insularity of promoter elements is still a long way off. Figure 5: Data obtained from flow cytometry experiments. The number showed is the mean of medians for 3 different experiments.Cell-free testing
This synthetic operator was part of the library that we used to test the activity of repressors caged with Dronpa
Figure 1 : the experiment conducted with the repressors caged with Dronpa Figure 2 : An over view of the results of the cell-free experiment. Each promoter was tested with its cognate repressors. Our results show that in 90% of our constructs caging the repressors with Dronpa has increased the repression strength. We have also obtained a wide linear range of repression strength-indicated by the red slope-. Figure 3: detailed Results of the cell-free experiment. Each promoter was tested with its cognate repressors. Top: Testing with TetR caged with either wt-Dronpa (BBa_K2510108) or a mutated version(BBa_K2510109)Middle: Testing with P22c2 caged with either wt-Dronpa (BBa_K2510112) or a mutated version(BBa_K2510113).Bottom: Testing with HKcI caged with either wt- Dronpa (BBa_K2510110) or a mutated version(BBa_K2510111) Figure 4: the wtDronpa has a better control of HKC1 and C2P22 repressors while the mutDronpa has a better control of TetR repressors Sequence and Features