Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K2260001:Design"

 
 
(4 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
  
−
__NOTOC__
+
<!--__NOTOC__-->
 
<partinfo>BBa_K2260001 short</partinfo>
 
<partinfo>BBa_K2260001 short</partinfo>
  
Line 7: Line 7:
  
 
===Design Notes===
 
===Design Notes===
−
Enter design considerations here.
+
<html>
−
 
+
<p style="text-indent: 4em;">
−
 
+
The phaC1J4 operon was codon optimized for use in <i>E. coli</i> using <a href ="http://www.kazusa.or.jp/codon/cgi-bin/showcodon.cgi?species=9606">this</a> codon optimization table. histidine tags were added to the N-termini of each protein in the operon for protein purification.
  
 +
</p>
 +
</html>
 
===Source===
 
===Source===
−
 
+
<html>
−
Enter source part here.
+
<p style="text-indent: 4em;">
 +
The phaC1 was obtained from <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i>, whereas phaJ4 was obtained from <i>Pseudomonas putida</i>.
 +
</p>
 +
</html>
  
 
===References===
 
===References===

Latest revision as of 03:51, 2 November 2017

phaC1J4 w/ Histidine tags


Assembly Compatibility:
  • 10
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
  • 12
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
  • 21
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
  • 23
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
  • 25
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
  • 1000
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]


Design Notes

The phaC1J4 operon was codon optimized for use in E. coli using this codon optimization table. histidine tags were added to the N-termini of each protein in the operon for protein purification.

Source

The phaC1 was obtained from Pseudomonas aeruginosa, whereas phaJ4 was obtained from Pseudomonas putida.

References