Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K2269017"
Albagoutiel (Talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
<!-- Add more about the biology of this part here | <!-- Add more about the biology of this part here | ||
===Usage and Biology=== | ===Usage and Biology=== | ||
+ | Recombinase directionality factor (RDF) performance SILVER | ||
+ | |||
+ | In order to increase the genetic control over the expression of any color inducing protein through a viral vector strategy, a modular and orthogonal AND gate was designed. In normal basis, plant would be constitutively expressing PhiC31 recombinase and the stress-inducible promoter would be in OFF state (i.e. in opposite direction to the desired CDS) . In this case, PhiC31 attachment sites have been already recombined (attR and attL), being PhiC31 uncapable of inversing them back by itself. To do so a helper protein is required, so called recombinase directionality factor (RDF). With this approach recombinase switch becomes more robust, stable and less leaky. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Figure 1. Dynamic performance between RDF and PhiC31. a) Graphic representation of the register assembly comprised by a promoter and a terminator with the recombined sites. It represents the negative control in the graphic. b) Genetic construct that allows a constitutively expression of PhiC31 under a weak promoter (OD* 0,01) c) Graphic representation of the genetic construct comprised by a promoter and a terminator with the attachment sites. It represents the positive control in the graphic. d) Graphic representation of the gp3 genetic construct. Its expression is under a strong promoter and was tested in both treatments (OD* 0,1 and OD* 0,2). e) Plot of the luciferase expression levels obtained over time. f) Bars chart representing the difference of luciferase expression levels obtained before and after RDF induction. | ||
+ | *Final Optical Density of Agrobacterium tumefaciens culture. e) Plot representing data obtained | ||
+ | |||
+ | Recombination directionality factor’s (RDF or gp3) ability to reverse the integrase actuation direction allowing the inducible stress-promoter to acquire the active state was demonstrated in this experiment. Following the experimental design (http://2017.igem.org/Team:Valencia_UPV/Experiments#GP3) we proved the effectiveness of the RDF in the recombination system. | ||
+ | |||
+ | As can be seen in Figure 9, the expression of gp3 together with PhiC31 trigger luciferase expression obtaining expression levels similars to a weak promoter (Pnos promoter). Interestingly, the highest level of luciferase expression (expression levels similar to a weak promoter — pNOS) was obtained with a low RDF expression (infiltrated at OD 0.1). Whereas, when the RDF was relatively high (infiltrated at OD 0.1, that is 2-fold in comparison with the other experimental treatment), the activation was lower than a weak promoter (pNOS) expression levels. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Conclusion: The ability of the recombinase directionality factor (RDF) to reverse the integrase action direction was demonstrated. Thus, postulating as the best way to control the direction of the stress-inducible promoter to express a color inducing protein. | ||
+ | |||
+ | RDF characterization | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | RDF:phiC31 ratios define re-inversion efficiency. Bearing that in mind, we resolved to demonstrate that the optimal ratio between RDF and PhiC31 is 20:1 using a weak promoter for the recombinase expression and a strong one for the RDF. However, several experiments were performanced in order to demonstrate this hypothesis. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Figure 2. Dynamic performance between RDF and PhiC31. a) Graphic representation of the register assembly comprised by a promoter and a terminator with the recombined sites. It represents the negative control in the graphic. b) Genetic construct that allows a constitutively expression of PhiC31 under a strong promoter (OD* 0,1) c) Graphic representation of the genetic construct comprised by a promoter and a terminator with the attachment sites. It represents the positive control in the graphic. d) Graphic representation of the gp3 genetic construct. Its expression is under a strong promoter and was tested in both treatments (OD* 0,05 and OD* 0,15). e) Line graph representing the data obtained of the level of luciferase expression over time for RDF module infiltrated at OD 0.05 and 0.15. f) Line graph representing the data obtained of the level of luciferase expression over time for RDF module infiltrated at OD 0.2 and 0.35. *Final Optical Density of Agrobacterium tumefaciens culture | ||
+ | |||
+ | As can be seen in Figure 2.E and 2.F, any of the RDF’s ODs assessed were able to trigger luciferase expression (i.e. re-inverting the promoter). | ||
+ | |||
+ | Conclusion: These results help to corroborate the unproductive complex hypothesis. When PhiC31 expression is under a strong promoter regulation, the formation of this complexes impedes the site-specific recombination event. | ||
+ | |||
<!-- --> | <!-- --> |
Revision as of 00:25, 2 November 2017
Gp3 (PhiC31 RDF)
Streptomyces phage phiC31-encoded recombination directionality factor (RDF). Upon interaction with PhiC31 Integrase, it promotes site-specific recombination of attR and attL attachment sites to produce PhiC31 attP and attB sites. It has been optimized for N. Benthamiana chassis.
Sequence and Features
Assembly Compatibility:
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
- 21INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]Illegal BglII site found at 10
- 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
- 1000COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]