Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K2235007"
MorganHjorth (Talk | contribs) (→Osmotic pressure detection) |
MorganHjorth (Talk | contribs) (→Expression and purification of sialidase) |
||
(36 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 66: | Line 66: | ||
===Expression and purification of sialidase=== | ===Expression and purification of sialidase=== | ||
− | We tested our biobrick by cultivating transformed bacteria (both TOP10 and ΔEnvZ) in different concentrations of sucrose, 0, 5, 10 and 15%. After a desired OD was reached (we used OD 0.4) we sonicated the cells to allow for purification of sialidase. The sialidase is connected to a His-tag so we used IMAC columns to purify the enzyme. The purified enzymes were then analyzed by SDS-PAGE, see figure 1 | + | We tested our biobrick by cultivating transformed bacteria (both TOP10 and ΔEnvZ) in different concentrations of sucrose, 0, 5, 10 and 15%. After a desired OD was reached (we used OD 0.4) we sonicated the cells to allow for purification of sialidase. The sialidase is connected to a His-tag so we used IMAC columns to purify the enzyme. The purified enzymes were then analyzed by SDS-PAGE, see figure 1. The figures shows some vague bands of sialidase for some of the concentrations, however this result is not conclusive enough to say anything about the gradient dependent expression. It is possible to say that the biobrick can produce sialidase, but more test would need to be done and we did not have enough time to finish them. |
− | + | [[File:OmpR sia SDS.png|600px|thumb|left|Figure 1]] | |
− | |||
− | + | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Figure 1. SDS-PAGE gel of sialidase expression. From left to right: ladder, well 2-3: expression in 5% sucrose, well 4-8: expression in 10% sucrose, well 9-14: expression in 15% sucrose, well 15: positive control. | ||
===Osmotic pressure detection=== | ===Osmotic pressure detection=== | ||
Before we ligated the OmpR promoter to sialidase we tested how the OmpR promoter works. We found an already existing biobrick for this (BBa_M30011) that had OmpR connected to RFP as a reporter. We designed an osmotic pressure test by the help of iGEM 2015 who already had worked with this biobrick. In the test we cultivated TOP10 cells in different sucrose and NaCl concentrations and measured the fluorescence of RFP at different OD points (for more detailed explanation see the experience page for BBa_M30011). The results we got showed that OmpR produced more RFP as the osmotic pressure increased by sucrose, see figure 4-5. However for NaCl we saw no correlation between the increase in osmotic pressure and RFP expression, see figure 6-7. We therefore decided to only use sucrose when we tested our final biobrick. | Before we ligated the OmpR promoter to sialidase we tested how the OmpR promoter works. We found an already existing biobrick for this (BBa_M30011) that had OmpR connected to RFP as a reporter. We designed an osmotic pressure test by the help of iGEM 2015 who already had worked with this biobrick. In the test we cultivated TOP10 cells in different sucrose and NaCl concentrations and measured the fluorescence of RFP at different OD points (for more detailed explanation see the experience page for BBa_M30011). The results we got showed that OmpR produced more RFP as the osmotic pressure increased by sucrose, see figure 4-5. However for NaCl we saw no correlation between the increase in osmotic pressure and RFP expression, see figure 6-7. We therefore decided to only use sucrose when we tested our final biobrick. | ||
− | [[File:Osmo RFP.png|600px|thumb|left|Figure 3]] | + | [[File:Osmo RFP.png|600px|thumb|left|Figure 2]] |
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Figure 2: Expression of RFP fluorescence after activation of the osmotic pressure sensitive promoter OmpR with different sucrose concentrations. As the sucrose concentration increases, and by so the osmotic pressure rises, the RFP expression is increased. | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[File:Osmo OD RFP.png|600px|thumb|left|Figure 3]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Figure 3: Expression of RFP fluorescence plotted against the OD-value at which the sample was taken. The higher sucrose concentrations did not reach the highest OD-values and are therefore missing some points. | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[File:Osmo NaCl RFP.png|600px|thumb|left|Figure 4]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Figure 4: Expression of RFP fluorescence after activation of the osmotic pressure sensitive promoter OmpR with different NaCl concentrations. No correlation can be seen from this graph. | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[File:Osmo NaCl OD RFP.png|600px|thumb|left|Figure 5]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Figure 5: Expression of RFP fluorescence plotted against the OD-value at which the sample was taken. No correlation can be seen from this graph. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Conclusion=== | ||
+ | What we have shown with these experiments is that BBa_K2235007 can produce sialidase. Its promoter should be able to detect a change in osmotic pressure due to increase in sucrose concentration, but our test gave no results for that. Since the test for sialidase expression was performed the last weeks before the Giant Jamboree we did not have time to redo the test. We think that if the test were performed again we would see the same increase of sialidase as we saw for RFP. |
Latest revision as of 16:11, 27 October 2017
OmpR promoter regulating the expression of sialidase enzyme
OmpR is an osmotic pressure promoter. It can sense changes in for example sucrose concentration. A higher concentration of sucrose will lead to a higher expression of the gene after the OmpR promoter. In this biobrick the gene after OmpR is an enzyme called sialidase. This enzyme cuts sialic acid (that's for example found in mucus). The sialidase produced by this biobrick has a HIS-tag on it to make it easy to purify.
Sequence and Features
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
- 21INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]Illegal XhoI site found at 189
- 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]Illegal NgoMIV site found at 636
Illegal NgoMIV site found at 711
Illegal NgoMIV site found at 801 - 1000INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]Illegal BsaI site found at 1181
Usage and biology
OmpR is an already well characterized biobrick (BBa_R0082). It is a promoter that takes advantage of the OmpR/EnvZ two-component system, which is utilized by many bacteria, to sense the change in osmotic pressure. We connected this promoter to the coding sequence for the enzyme sialidase. This enzyme hydrolyzes glycosidic linkages of terminal sialic acid residues in glycoproteins. This composite biobrick can be used to produce sialidase when the osmotic pressure in the environment around the bacteria increases.
Important parameters
Table 1: Parameters for OmpR sialidase biobrick (BBa_K2235007)
Experiment | Characteristic | Result |
---|---|---|
Expression | ||
Compatibility | E. coli TOP10
E. coli ΔEnvZ | |
Promoter | OmpR | |
Optimal temperature | 37 °C | |
Number of amino acids | XXX | |
Molecular weight | XXXnbsp;kDa | |
Purification | ||
Tag | C-terminal 6xHis | |
Sialidase expression | ||
SDS-PAGE | Sialidase expression seen in some tests | |
Osmotic pressure detection | ||
Sucrose | Works | |
NaCl | Non-conclusive data |
Expression and purification of sialidase
We tested our biobrick by cultivating transformed bacteria (both TOP10 and ΔEnvZ) in different concentrations of sucrose, 0, 5, 10 and 15%. After a desired OD was reached (we used OD 0.4) we sonicated the cells to allow for purification of sialidase. The sialidase is connected to a His-tag so we used IMAC columns to purify the enzyme. The purified enzymes were then analyzed by SDS-PAGE, see figure 1. The figures shows some vague bands of sialidase for some of the concentrations, however this result is not conclusive enough to say anything about the gradient dependent expression. It is possible to say that the biobrick can produce sialidase, but more test would need to be done and we did not have enough time to finish them.
Figure 1. SDS-PAGE gel of sialidase expression. From left to right: ladder, well 2-3: expression in 5% sucrose, well 4-8: expression in 10% sucrose, well 9-14: expression in 15% sucrose, well 15: positive control.
Osmotic pressure detection
Before we ligated the OmpR promoter to sialidase we tested how the OmpR promoter works. We found an already existing biobrick for this (BBa_M30011) that had OmpR connected to RFP as a reporter. We designed an osmotic pressure test by the help of iGEM 2015 who already had worked with this biobrick. In the test we cultivated TOP10 cells in different sucrose and NaCl concentrations and measured the fluorescence of RFP at different OD points (for more detailed explanation see the experience page for BBa_M30011). The results we got showed that OmpR produced more RFP as the osmotic pressure increased by sucrose, see figure 4-5. However for NaCl we saw no correlation between the increase in osmotic pressure and RFP expression, see figure 6-7. We therefore decided to only use sucrose when we tested our final biobrick.
Figure 2: Expression of RFP fluorescence after activation of the osmotic pressure sensitive promoter OmpR with different sucrose concentrations. As the sucrose concentration increases, and by so the osmotic pressure rises, the RFP expression is increased.
Figure 3: Expression of RFP fluorescence plotted against the OD-value at which the sample was taken. The higher sucrose concentrations did not reach the highest OD-values and are therefore missing some points.
Figure 4: Expression of RFP fluorescence after activation of the osmotic pressure sensitive promoter OmpR with different NaCl concentrations. No correlation can be seen from this graph.
Figure 5: Expression of RFP fluorescence plotted against the OD-value at which the sample was taken. No correlation can be seen from this graph.
Conclusion
What we have shown with these experiments is that BBa_K2235007 can produce sialidase. Its promoter should be able to detect a change in osmotic pressure due to increase in sucrose concentration, but our test gave no results for that. Since the test for sialidase expression was performed the last weeks before the Giant Jamboree we did not have time to redo the test. We think that if the test were performed again we would see the same increase of sialidase as we saw for RFP.