|
|
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| + | <html> |
| + | <body> |
| __NOTOC__ | | __NOTOC__ |
| <partinfo>BBa_K1075044 short</partinfo> | | <partinfo>BBa_K1075044 short</partinfo> |
Line 36: |
Line 38: |
| Our initial characterization was conducted with 1 second pulses and revealed a significant lag between initial exposure and translational response: | | Our initial characterization was conducted with 1 second pulses and revealed a significant lag between initial exposure and translational response: |
| | | |
− | <html>
| + | |
− | <body>
| + | <img class='img-responsive' src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/a/a3/T--Cornell--WetLab_pDawnTimeDependence.png"alt="pDawn_TimeDependence" width="800"> |
− | <img class='img-responsive' src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/a/a3/T--Cornell--WetLab_pDawnTimeDependence.png"alt="pDawn_TimeDependence" width="800"></body> | + | |
− | </html>
| + | |
| | | |
| | | |
Line 61: |
Line 61: |
| <partinfo>BBa_K1075044 parameters</partinfo> | | <partinfo>BBa_K1075044 parameters</partinfo> |
| <!-- --> | | <!-- --> |
| + | </body> |
| + | </html> |
Revision as of 03:43, 27 October 2017
__NOTOC__
BBa_K1075044 short
pDawn can be used to induce transcription of a downstream gene with blue light.
The plasmid pDawn was designed by Ohlendorf et al. in 2012 together with its counter plasmid pDusk. Both plasmids are single plasmid systems, which allow the activation (pDawn) or repression (pDusk) of gene expression by blue light. They are easy to implement in the laboratory and lead to up to 460-fold activity change upon ilumination.
===Usage and Biology===
Ohlendorf et al. (2012) had previously designed the histidine kinase YF1, which phosphorylates FixJ in the absence of blue light. The phosphorylated FixJ drives robust gene expression from the FixK2 promotor as shown in figure 1 for both pDawn and the pDusk. Upon light absorption, net kinase activity of YF1 and consequently gene expression under control of the FixK2 promotor is greatly reduced.
pDusk an pDawn enable light-repressed or light-induced gene expression in Escherichia coli and are easy to implement in the laboratory. Therefore, all components of the YF1/FixJ TCS were assembled on only one medium-copy plasmid in which YF1 and FixJ are constitutively expressed by the Lacq promotor. Target genes can be introduced via the multiple-cloning site (MCS) under the control of the pFixK2 promotor, allowing light-repressed gene expression. To obtain pDawn the light effect is inverted by the introduction of a gene-inversion cassette into pDusk. This gene-inversion cassette is based on the λ phage repressor cI and the λ phage promotor pR.
Ohlendorf et al. (2012) analyzed the system by the insertion of the red-fluorescent reporter protein DsRed Express2. That way they were able to measure up to 460-fold induction upon ilumination. However, they also found that their plasmid, which acts on gene expression level, only allows light-induced perturbations on the timescale of hours.
===Further Characterization===
In addition to the literature data, further testing was conducted in 2017 by Cornell iGEM. By growing E. coli under different intensities of visible light, we can compare the relative expression levels of a FLAG-tagged control protein, superoxide dismutase, under optogenetic control.
We first inserted superoxide dismutase into the pDusk circuit. We then proceeded to incorporate a cI repressor (BBa_K2296045) and a pR promoter into the pDusk system followed by insertion of superoxide dismutase to create a light-inducible pDawn circuit.
We assessed the transcriptional activity of pDawn and pDusk in response to three different levels of light intensity from a standard laboratory fluorescent light:
https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/3/31/T--Cornell--WetLab_DoseResponse.png
Our initial characterization revealed a dose-dependence of pDusk. However, pDawn did not display a dose-dependent response in response to stimulation from fluorescent light. We suspect this to be the result of low light intensity.
Our subsequent characterization uses a significantly greater intensity of LED light:
https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/5/59/T--Cornell--WetLab_pDawnpDuskExpression.png
Our results suggest a light-intensity dependence of pDusk and pDawn. Our results also show that our cI repressor biobrick successfully converted the light-repressible pDusk into a light-inducible pDawn.
In addition to dose-dependent characterization, we also conducted time-dependence characterization of pDawn following stimulation by 470 nm LED light (LTL3H3TBPADS1) with the following emission spectrum [12]:
https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/6/6e/470LEDAbsSpec.png
Our initial characterization was conducted with 1 second pulses and revealed a significant lag between initial exposure and translational response:
For our subsequent characterization, we increased the intensity and pulse duration of the LED to parse out more subtle effects at earlier time points:
https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/0/03/T--Cornell--WetLab_pDawnTimeDependenceGraph.png
Our results suggest a light intensity and time-dependence of the pDawn and pDusk optogenetic circuit.
'''References'''
[http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022283612000113] Ohlendorf et al. (2009) From Dusk till Dawn One-Plasmid Systems for Light-Regulated Gene Expression.
Sequence and Features
BBa_K1075044 SequenceAndFeatures