Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K2240003"
Karencheng (Talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<partinfo>BBa_K2240003 short</partinfo> | <partinfo>BBa_K2240003 short</partinfo> | ||
− | The function of this part is to detect the deliberately released stimulus | + | <p>The function of this part is to detect the deliberately released stimulus so as to initiate the process of 'knockout'. Considering that the released stimulus can be diluted in an environment, a positive feedback loop is introduced to amplify the signal. 3OC6HSL, which is a member of acyl-homoserine lactone (AHL) family, would be the inducer. 3OC6HSL originated from <i>V. fischeri</i> is a lipid molecule that can diffuse through bacterial cell membrane to facilitate the cell-to-cell communication.</p> |
− | + | <p>This part begins with the TetR repressible promoter (BBa_R0040), which can act as a constitutive promoter of the downstream protein - LuxR (BBa_C0062) under the absence of repressor TetR. Once the 3OC6HSL is added, LuxR will form a complex with 3OC6HSL and then activates the downstream promoter, P<sub>LuxR</sub> (BBa_R0062). In the end, the production of the LuxR can be boost, thus accumulate the LuxR. </p> | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | <p>After the activation of P<sub>LuxR</sub>, LuxI protein (BBa_C0061), which is an autoinducer synthetase catalyzes 3OC6HSL from S-adenosyl-L-methionine (SAM) in cell. Due to the increase of the 3OC6HSL/LuxR complex, the entire part starting from P<sub>tetR</sub> to LuxI generates positive feedback loop, hence further induce the P<sub>LuxR</sub>. Apart from this, the 3OC6HSL molecule can also diffuse out to the extracellular environment and induce the cells nearby.</p> | |
− | + | <p>Owing to the positive feedback loop, this part would start contributing to signal emission whenever it receives 3OC6HSL molecules. As a result, it is expected to elevate the efficiency of activation under specific condition.</p> | |
− | + | <p>Considering the difficulties that previous iGEM team encountered - the leakiness of P<sub>LuxR</sub> (See experience in <bbpart>BBa_F2620</bbpart>), we tried to get rid of this by adding sequences of antisense RNA Binding regions and antisense RNA in which their interaction could counteract the activity of basal level. Ideally, this could help tackling the thorny issue which would happen when there is little expression of gene, especially without the initial activation of AHL.</p> | |
+ | <br> | ||
− | The antisense RNA we | + | ===Designs & Hypothesis=== |
+ | <p>The antisense RNA we used had two important characteristics which might help reduce leakiness: possessing the sequence complementary to the of mRNA of ABR, and a Hfq (RNA binding protein) binding site. The affiliation of antisense RNA to the complementary ABR would prevent ribosome from binding to the mRNA of the targeted RBS. Meanwhile, the presence of a Hfq binding site would help reduce the translation of the 3OC6HSL/LuxR complex since Hfq binding site was suspected to recruit RNase to degrade the targeted RNA chain. With these two effects, the leakiness of P<sub>LuxR</sub> could be lowered.</p> | ||
− | + | <p>There are two antisense RNA binding regions (ABR) in total. One is placed right before the targeted ribosomal binding site (RBS), which is upstream to the LuxI (BBa_C0061) and GFP (BBa_E0040) while another one is placed downstream of the positive feedback loop.</p> | |
− | + | <p>Despite the action of the antisense RNA, 3OC6HSL/LuxR complex could still repress P<sub>LuxL</sub>, increasing the production of mRNA of LuxI under the presence of 3OC6HSL. This meant that the maximum level of LuxI translation could be maintained after 3OC6HSL induction.</p> | |
− | + | <p>Based on the above reasons, it is expected that the ability in sensing the overall population would become more sensitive due to the positive feedback loop while leakiness could be reduced at the same time without hampering the normal feedback activity triggered by AHL.</p> | |
+ | |||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Results=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | <br> | ||
<!-- Add more about the biology of this part here | <!-- Add more about the biology of this part here |
Revision as of 16:47, 26 October 2017
AHL sensor with positive feedback loop, GFP output and antisense RNA type 2 inhibition
The function of this part is to detect the deliberately released stimulus so as to initiate the process of 'knockout'. Considering that the released stimulus can be diluted in an environment, a positive feedback loop is introduced to amplify the signal. 3OC6HSL, which is a member of acyl-homoserine lactone (AHL) family, would be the inducer. 3OC6HSL originated from V. fischeri is a lipid molecule that can diffuse through bacterial cell membrane to facilitate the cell-to-cell communication.
This part begins with the TetR repressible promoter (BBa_R0040), which can act as a constitutive promoter of the downstream protein - LuxR (BBa_C0062) under the absence of repressor TetR. Once the 3OC6HSL is added, LuxR will form a complex with 3OC6HSL and then activates the downstream promoter, PLuxR (BBa_R0062). In the end, the production of the LuxR can be boost, thus accumulate the LuxR.
After the activation of PLuxR, LuxI protein (BBa_C0061), which is an autoinducer synthetase catalyzes 3OC6HSL from S-adenosyl-L-methionine (SAM) in cell. Due to the increase of the 3OC6HSL/LuxR complex, the entire part starting from PtetR to LuxI generates positive feedback loop, hence further induce the PLuxR. Apart from this, the 3OC6HSL molecule can also diffuse out to the extracellular environment and induce the cells nearby.
Owing to the positive feedback loop, this part would start contributing to signal emission whenever it receives 3OC6HSL molecules. As a result, it is expected to elevate the efficiency of activation under specific condition.
Considering the difficulties that previous iGEM team encountered - the leakiness of PLuxR (See experience in BBa_F2620), we tried to get rid of this by adding sequences of antisense RNA Binding regions and antisense RNA in which their interaction could counteract the activity of basal level. Ideally, this could help tackling the thorny issue which would happen when there is little expression of gene, especially without the initial activation of AHL.
Designs & Hypothesis
The antisense RNA we used had two important characteristics which might help reduce leakiness: possessing the sequence complementary to the of mRNA of ABR, and a Hfq (RNA binding protein) binding site. The affiliation of antisense RNA to the complementary ABR would prevent ribosome from binding to the mRNA of the targeted RBS. Meanwhile, the presence of a Hfq binding site would help reduce the translation of the 3OC6HSL/LuxR complex since Hfq binding site was suspected to recruit RNase to degrade the targeted RNA chain. With these two effects, the leakiness of PLuxR could be lowered.
There are two antisense RNA binding regions (ABR) in total. One is placed right before the targeted ribosomal binding site (RBS), which is upstream to the LuxI (BBa_C0061) and GFP (BBa_E0040) while another one is placed downstream of the positive feedback loop.
Despite the action of the antisense RNA, 3OC6HSL/LuxR complex could still repress PLuxL, increasing the production of mRNA of LuxI under the presence of 3OC6HSL. This meant that the maximum level of LuxI translation could be maintained after 3OC6HSL induction.
Based on the above reasons, it is expected that the ability in sensing the overall population would become more sensitive due to the positive feedback loop while leakiness could be reduced at the same time without hampering the normal feedback activity triggered by AHL.
Results
Sequence and Features
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
- 21INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]Illegal BglII site found at 1752
- 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
- 1000INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]Illegal BsaI.rc site found at 1004
Illegal BsaI.rc site found at 2457
Illegal BsaI.rc site found at 2676