Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K1355001:Experience"

 
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
 
how you used this part and how it worked out.
 
how you used this part and how it worked out.
  
−
===Applications of BBa_K1355001===
+
===Mer Operon regulation system improviment to increase Hg bioremediation===
 +
 
 +
Our team (UFAM-UEA_Brazil) worked improving the Mer operon expression to increase bioremediation in E. coli through novel mer promoters sequences. For it, we primarily characterized the MerR expression under control of different promoters from Anderson Collection (BBa_J23100, BBa_J23104, BBa_J23106 e BBa_I142033) through the repression of RFP (BBa_K081014) production, in a synthetic genetic circuit represented bellow.   
 +
<center>https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/6/6a/UFAM_UEA_MERR_PART_2.png</center>
 +
<center><b>Figure 02:</b> MerR expression test. </center>
 +
 
 +
On the first experiment, we used the novel regulated promoter designed by our team BBa_K2123109 (Stationary growth phase promoter with downstream mer operator) to measure the RFP repression by MerR under control of BBa_J23100, BBa_J23104, BBa_J23106 e BBa_I142033 constitutive promoters in solid LB media, as you can see below.
 +
 
 +
<center>https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/b/bb/Imagem3.png</center>
 +
 
 +
<center><b>Figure 03:</b> MerR repressing RFP production in different levels cloned in E. coli DH5-alpha.</center>
 +
 
 +
You can analyse by the RFP expression and thus fluorescence intensity that the samples greater repressed by MerR was the ones under control of BBa_J23100 and BBa_I14033 constituve promoters. So, we measured the RFP expression using Chamaleon Spectrofluorometer with and without MerR repressor protein under control of these two constituve promoter. The results are presented in the graph 1 below.
 +
 
 +
<center>https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/d/db/Ufam_uea_merr_part4.png</center>
 +
 
 +
<b>Graph 1:</b> RFP expression with and without MerR regulator under control of BBa_J23100 and BBa_I14033. Control bacteria is DH5-alpha without any plasmid vector.
 +
 
 +
As we can see, between BBa_J23100 and BBa_I14033, the best repressed was with BBa_J23100 constitutive promoter. So, we selected BBa_J23100 to controls MerR expression in our synthetic genetic circuits. We made also other experiments to understand the interactions between MerR and new regulated promoters designed by our team, aiming to reach a well repressor mechanism, increasing the natural MerR regulation. In this way, we measured MerR regulation with two more regulated promoters: BBa_K2123102 and BBa_K2123101 - Tac promoter + overlapped and between mer operator, respectively expression RFP. The MerR regulation mechanism was characterized by repressing RFP expression and therefore reducing fluorescence intensity according to the regulator efficiency. We measured it also utilizing Chamaleon Spectrofluorometer. The results are presented in the graph 2 and 3 below.
 +
 
 +
<center>https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/f/f8/Ufam_uea_merr_part5.png</center>
 +
 
 +
<b>Graph 02 and 03:</b> RFP expression with and without MerR regulator under control of BBa_J23100 constitutive promoter, repressing BBa_K2123101 and BBa_K2123102 new regulated promoters.
 +
We achieved almost a totally repression with this BioBrick part! Awesome results, as you can see in the figures below.
 +
 
 +
<center>https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/b/bd/Ufam_uea_merr_part6.png</center>
 +
 
 +
<b>Figure 04:</b> RFP expression regulation by MerR.
 +
 
 +
To finalize this part characterization, we cloned it with the Mer Operon improved genes device, as the figure below, aiming to measure the amoung of mercury bioremediated under control of our MerR with very strong regulation in 7.5ppm of mercury chloride with 10 hours of growth.
 +
 
 +
<center>https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/7/7e/UFAM_MERBA_10.png</center>
 +
 
 +
Previous iGEM projects achieved 75% of mercury bioremediated with their synthetic genetic circuits. With our improvement, designing new regulated promoters sequences and thus increasing MerR regulation, this amoung increased to =97%= of mercury bioremediation in E. coli DH5-alpha. We measured with DMA-80 (Direct Mercury Analyser) equipment. Check this out below!
 +
 
 +
<center>https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/e/ef/Ufam_uea_merr_part7.png</center>
 +
 
 +
<b>Graph 04:</b> Comparison growth curve of previous synthetic genetic circuits (BBa_K1355004) with our improved devices in 7.5ppm of mercury chloride, measured with spectrophotometer (600nm wavelenght).
 +
 
 +
<center>https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/a/ac/Ufam_uea_merr_part8.png</center>
 +
<b>Graph 05:</b> Amoung of mercury after 10 hours of bacterial growth with our construction (BBa_K2123108).
 +
So, to validate it, our team constructed the first real bioreactor for mercury bioremediation of iGEM! See the results below!
 +
 
 +
<center>https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/9/96/UFAM_MERBA_8.png</center>
 +
 
 +
After 18h, our construction reached 70% of mercury bioremediation! Want to see more? Access our wiki: 2016.igem.org/Team:UFAM-UEA_Brazil. 
  
 
===User Reviews===
 
===User Reviews===

Latest revision as of 01:35, 28 October 2016


This experience page is provided so that any user may enter their experience using this part.
Please enter how you used this part and how it worked out.

Mer Operon regulation system improviment to increase Hg bioremediation

Our team (UFAM-UEA_Brazil) worked improving the Mer operon expression to increase bioremediation in E. coli through novel mer promoters sequences. For it, we primarily characterized the MerR expression under control of different promoters from Anderson Collection (BBa_J23100, BBa_J23104, BBa_J23106 e BBa_I142033) through the repression of RFP (BBa_K081014) production, in a synthetic genetic circuit represented bellow.

UFAM_UEA_MERR_PART_2.png
Figure 02: MerR expression test.

On the first experiment, we used the novel regulated promoter designed by our team BBa_K2123109 (Stationary growth phase promoter with downstream mer operator) to measure the RFP repression by MerR under control of BBa_J23100, BBa_J23104, BBa_J23106 e BBa_I142033 constitutive promoters in solid LB media, as you can see below.

Imagem3.png
Figure 03: MerR repressing RFP production in different levels cloned in E. coli DH5-alpha.

You can analyse by the RFP expression and thus fluorescence intensity that the samples greater repressed by MerR was the ones under control of BBa_J23100 and BBa_I14033 constituve promoters. So, we measured the RFP expression using Chamaleon Spectrofluorometer with and without MerR repressor protein under control of these two constituve promoter. The results are presented in the graph 1 below.

Ufam_uea_merr_part4.png

Graph 1: RFP expression with and without MerR regulator under control of BBa_J23100 and BBa_I14033. Control bacteria is DH5-alpha without any plasmid vector.

As we can see, between BBa_J23100 and BBa_I14033, the best repressed was with BBa_J23100 constitutive promoter. So, we selected BBa_J23100 to controls MerR expression in our synthetic genetic circuits. We made also other experiments to understand the interactions between MerR and new regulated promoters designed by our team, aiming to reach a well repressor mechanism, increasing the natural MerR regulation. In this way, we measured MerR regulation with two more regulated promoters: BBa_K2123102 and BBa_K2123101 - Tac promoter + overlapped and between mer operator, respectively expression RFP. The MerR regulation mechanism was characterized by repressing RFP expression and therefore reducing fluorescence intensity according to the regulator efficiency. We measured it also utilizing Chamaleon Spectrofluorometer. The results are presented in the graph 2 and 3 below.

Ufam_uea_merr_part5.png

Graph 02 and 03: RFP expression with and without MerR regulator under control of BBa_J23100 constitutive promoter, repressing BBa_K2123101 and BBa_K2123102 new regulated promoters. We achieved almost a totally repression with this BioBrick part! Awesome results, as you can see in the figures below.

Ufam_uea_merr_part6.png

Figure 04: RFP expression regulation by MerR.

To finalize this part characterization, we cloned it with the Mer Operon improved genes device, as the figure below, aiming to measure the amoung of mercury bioremediated under control of our MerR with very strong regulation in 7.5ppm of mercury chloride with 10 hours of growth.

UFAM_MERBA_10.png

Previous iGEM projects achieved 75% of mercury bioremediated with their synthetic genetic circuits. With our improvement, designing new regulated promoters sequences and thus increasing MerR regulation, this amoung increased to =97%= of mercury bioremediation in E. coli DH5-alpha. We measured with DMA-80 (Direct Mercury Analyser) equipment. Check this out below!

Ufam_uea_merr_part7.png

Graph 04: Comparison growth curve of previous synthetic genetic circuits (BBa_K1355004) with our improved devices in 7.5ppm of mercury chloride, measured with spectrophotometer (600nm wavelenght).

Ufam_uea_merr_part8.png

Graph 05: Amoung of mercury after 10 hours of bacterial growth with our construction (BBa_K2123108). So, to validate it, our team constructed the first real bioreactor for mercury bioremediation of iGEM! See the results below!

UFAM_MERBA_8.png

After 18h, our construction reached 70% of mercury bioremediation! Want to see more? Access our wiki: 2016.igem.org/Team:UFAM-UEA_Brazil.

User Reviews

UNIQc11b6b812ebf4318-partinfo-00000000-QINU UNIQc11b6b812ebf4318-partinfo-00000001-QINU