Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K2036007"
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
− | CII (BBa_K2036000) functions as a transcriptional activator to direct promoter RE, so we constructed CII-TT-pRE-RBS-GFP-LVAssrAtag as test group and pRE-RBS- | + | CII (BBa_K2036000) functions as a transcriptional activator to direct promoter RE, so we constructed CII-TT-pRE-RBS-GFP-LVAssrAtag as the test group and pRE-RBS-GFP-LVAssrAtag as CK to see whether CII efficiently activates pRE. |
</p> | </p> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
− | [[File:T--HUST-China--CII-pRE_plate.png|800px|thumb|center|Fig1: According to the | + | [[File:T--HUST-China--CII-pRE_plate.png|800px|thumb|center|Fig1: According to the Fluorescence measurement curve above, we can see clearly that GFP level increased over time and it showed significant difference from CK.]] |
<br> | <br> | ||
[[File:T--HUST-China--Experiments-CII-pRE_Flou-detec.png|800px|thumb|center|Fig2: We also did Fluorescence microscope detection after 30, 120 and 240 minutes induction. According to the figture below, we can tell qualitively that pRE leakage are at relative low level and CII can efficiently activate the promoter.]] | [[File:T--HUST-China--Experiments-CII-pRE_Flou-detec.png|800px|thumb|center|Fig2: We also did Fluorescence microscope detection after 30, 120 and 240 minutes induction. According to the figture below, we can tell qualitively that pRE leakage are at relative low level and CII can efficiently activate the promoter.]] | ||
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
− | We had submitted and documented RBS-CIII-RBS-CIII-RBS-CII-TT-pRE-RBS-GFP-LVAssrAtag (BBa_K2036014) and RBS-CII-RBS-CII-RBS-CII-TT-pRE-RBS-GFP-LVAssrAtag (BBa_K2036015). These two parts were to test whether CIII can protect CII from being degraded by Ftsh by competitive inhibition. | + | We had submitted and documented RBS-CIII-RBS-CIII-RBS-CII-TT-pRE-RBS-GFP-LVAssrAtag (BBa_K2036014) and RBS-CII-RBS-CII-RBS-CII-TT-pRE-RBS-GFP-LVAssrAtag (BBa_K2036015). These two parts were constructed to test whether CIII can protect CII from being degraded by Ftsh by competitive inhibition. |
</p> | </p> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
− | [[File:T--HUST-China--CIII%26Ftsh.png|800px|thumb|center|Fig3: According to the | + | [[File:T--HUST-China--CIII%26Ftsh.png|800px|thumb|center|Fig3: According to the Fluorescence measurement curve above, we can see clearly that GFP level of CIII test circuit increased over time and it showed significant difference from two control groups. It indicates that tandomly expressed CIII can efficiently protect CII from being degraded by Ftsh. ]] |
Revision as of 04:52, 25 October 2016
RBS-CII-RBS-CII, tandem expression
CII is a transcriptional activator of pRE, but it is normally degrade by Ftsh, and in this case,tandom expression maybe useful to activate pRE.
Sequence and Features
Assembly Compatibility:
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
- 21COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
- 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
- 1000COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]
Protein&promoter
--CII and pRE
CII (BBa_K2036000) functions as a transcriptional activator to direct promoter RE, so we constructed CII-TT-pRE-RBS-GFP-LVAssrAtag as the test group and pRE-RBS-GFP-LVAssrAtag as CK to see whether CII efficiently activates pRE.
Protein&protein reaction
We had submitted and documented RBS-CIII-RBS-CIII-RBS-CII-TT-pRE-RBS-GFP-LVAssrAtag (BBa_K2036014) and RBS-CII-RBS-CII-RBS-CII-TT-pRE-RBS-GFP-LVAssrAtag (BBa_K2036015). These two parts were constructed to test whether CIII can protect CII from being degraded by Ftsh by competitive inhibition.