Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K1980012"

(Microscopy)
 
(23 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
__NOTOC__
 
__NOTOC__
 
<partinfo>BBa_K1980012 short</partinfo>
 
<partinfo>BBa_K1980012 short</partinfo>
 
+
==Description==
This part is our chelator MymTsfGFP expressed from this copper-sensitive promoter pCopA with the regulator of pCopA (CueR) expressed divergent from the promotor.  
+
<html><p>
 
+
This part is our chelator MymTsfGFP (<a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1980003">BBa_K1980003</a>) expressed from this copper-sensitive promoter pCopA with the regulator of pCopA (CueR) expressed divergent from the promotor (<a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1980006">BBa_K1980006</a>).
 +
</p></html>
 
<!-- -->
 
<!-- -->
 
<span class='h3bb'>Sequence and Features:</span>
 
<span class='h3bb'>Sequence and Features:</span>
Line 10: Line 11:
  
 
==Usage and Biology==
 
==Usage and Biology==
 +
Our project was to investigate a probiotic treatment for the copper-accumulation disorder: Wilson's disease. This required a system able to detect dietary copper, ideally in the range over which copper concentration changes after a meal (around 5-10μM). When copper is detected a copper chelating protein should be induced to lower the free copper concentration to prevent its absorption by the body.
 +
==CueR and pCopA==
 
<p><i>E. coli</i> cells use a protein called CueR to regulate the cytoplasmic copper concentration. CueR is a MerR-type regulator with an interesting mechanism of action whereby it can behave as a net activator or a net repressor under different copper concentrations through interaction with RNA polymerase<sup>(1)</sup>. CueR forms dimers consisting of three functional domains (a DNA-binding, a dimerisation and a metal-binding domain). The DNA binding domains bind to DNA inverted repeats called CueR boxes with the sequence:</p>
 
<p><i>E. coli</i> cells use a protein called CueR to regulate the cytoplasmic copper concentration. CueR is a MerR-type regulator with an interesting mechanism of action whereby it can behave as a net activator or a net repressor under different copper concentrations through interaction with RNA polymerase<sup>(1)</sup>. CueR forms dimers consisting of three functional domains (a DNA-binding, a dimerisation and a metal-binding domain). The DNA binding domains bind to DNA inverted repeats called CueR boxes with the sequence:</p>
  
Line 15: Line 18:
 
   
 
   
 
<p>This box is present at the promoter regions of the copper exporting ATPase CopA, some molybdenum cofactor synthesis genes and the periplasmic copper oxidase protein CueO.<sup>(2)</sup></p>
 
<p>This box is present at the promoter regions of the copper exporting ATPase CopA, some molybdenum cofactor synthesis genes and the periplasmic copper oxidase protein CueO.<sup>(2)</sup></p>
 +
===MymTsfGFP===
 +
 +
MymT is a small prokaryotic copper metallothein discovered in <i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i>. It can bind up to 7 copper ions but has a preference for 4-6. This version has a C terminal sfGFP with a C terminal hexahistidine tag for purification. The MymT and sfGFP are separated by a short hydrophilic, flexible linker.
  
 +
===Composite===
  
 +
Copper should induce the expression of the chelator via CueR. The chelator should reduce the free copper concentration therefore reducing it level of expression. This should in theory result in the free copper concentration falling to a low, stable level.
 +
<p>This is how the part is intended to work <i>in vivo</i>:
 +
[[Image:T--Oxford--Sam-pmg-diagram.jpg|400px|thumb|centre|Schematic of BBa K1980012 using a yeast metallothein (PDB: 1AQR) to represent MymT]]</p>
  
 
==Experience==
 
==Experience==
 
<p>We cloned pCopA MymT sfGFP with divergent expressed CueR from a gBlock into the shipping plasmid pSB1C3. <i>E. coli</i> strain MG1655 was transformed using the specific recombinant plasmid and a 5ml culture of a transformed colony was grown overnight. The functionality of the construct was tested using plate reading, flow cytometry and microscopy</p>
 
<p>We cloned pCopA MymT sfGFP with divergent expressed CueR from a gBlock into the shipping plasmid pSB1C3. <i>E. coli</i> strain MG1655 was transformed using the specific recombinant plasmid and a 5ml culture of a transformed colony was grown overnight. The functionality of the construct was tested using plate reading, flow cytometry and microscopy</p>
 
<p>This is how the part is intended to work <i>in vivo</i>
 
[[Image:T--Oxford--Sam-pmg-diagram.jpg|400px|thumb|centre|Schematic of the construct and how it works]]</p>
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
===Plate Reader===
 
===Plate Reader===
Line 39: Line 40:
 
</p>
 
</p>
 
<p>
 
<p>
A range of copper concentrations were prepared from stock solutions. A large volume plate was then prepared with 10μl of copper solution, 10μl of overnight culture and 980μl of broth with antibiotic. This resulted in a 1 in 100 dilution of the copper solutions prepared.
+
A range of copper concentrations were prepared from stock solutions. A large volume plate was then prepared with 10μl of copper solution, 10μl of overnight culture and 980μl of broth with antibiotic. This resulted in a 1 in 100 dilution of the copper solutions prepared.
 
</p>
 
</p>
 
<p>
 
<p>
 
  This large-volume plate was then centrifuged  to mix the solutions and then 200μl transferred to a small-volume plate with a clear lid and then placed in the plate reader. </p>
 
  This large-volume plate was then centrifuged  to mix the solutions and then 200μl transferred to a small-volume plate with a clear lid and then placed in the plate reader. </p>
 
<p>
 
<p>
Four biological repeats of the part to be tested in MG1655 at ten different copper concentrations were measured as well as four repeats of a MG1655 negative control.
+
Four biological repeats of this part at ten different copper concentrations were measured as well as four repeats of a negative control (The NC part from the interlab study) and a positive control (The constitutive GFP expressing, PC part from the Interlab study).
 
</p>
 
</p>
 
<p>
 
<p>
Line 58: Line 59:
  
 
===Flow cytometry===
 
===Flow cytometry===
[[Image:T--Oxford--Sam-pmg-flow.jpg|400px|thumb|right|Flow cytometry of this part at different copper concentrations]]
+
[[Image:T--Oxford--Sam-pmg-flow.jpg|400px|thumb|right|The population distribution of this part at different copper concentrations as measured by flow cytometry]]
 
<p>
 
<p>
 
Flow cytometry is a technique whereby cells are passed individually into the path of a beam of light. The frequency range of incident light can be adjusted to allow excitation of specific fluorophores in the sample of cells. Downstream detectors can measure fluorescent emission, and this data can be used to quantify the amount of fluorophore in each cell.</p>
 
Flow cytometry is a technique whereby cells are passed individually into the path of a beam of light. The frequency range of incident light can be adjusted to allow excitation of specific fluorophores in the sample of cells. Downstream detectors can measure fluorescent emission, and this data can be used to quantify the amount of fluorophore in each cell.</p>
Line 80: Line 81:
  
 
===Microscopy===
 
===Microscopy===
[[Image:T--Oxford--Sam-pmg-microscopy.jpg|400px|thumb|right|Microscopy performed on this part at different copper concentrations. Fluorescent, differential interference contrast channels and a composite shown]]
+
[[Image:T--Oxford--Sam-pmg-micro2.jpg|400px|thumb|right|Microscopy performed on this part at different copper concentrations. Fluorescent, differential interference contrast channels and a composite shown]]
 
<p>
 
<p>
 
Microscopy was done in order to visually confirm the plate reader and flow cytometer experiments.  
 
Microscopy was done in order to visually confirm the plate reader and flow cytometer experiments.  
Line 94: Line 95:
 
</p>
 
</p>
  
 +
===Absorbance Assay===
  
 +
<p> Separately MymTsfGFP was cloned from Gblock (<html><a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1980002">BBa_K1980002</a></html>) into the shipping vector then transferred it into the pBAD, arabinose-inducible commercial expression vector. </p>
  
 +
<p>We were unable however to detect a drop in solution copper concentration due to copper chelation activity of MymT when expressed from pBAD in MG1655 <i>E. coli</i> strain, using an absorbance assay. Performing a similar procedure with this part also showed no measurable drop in copper concentration.
 +
</p>
 +
<p>
 +
The assay used was the reagent Bathocuproine disulphonic Acid (BCS). BCS is colourless in the absence of Cu<sup>+</sup> but upon exposure to Cu<sup>+</sup>, BCS forms complexes with Cu<sup>+</sup> and absorbs strongly in the 480nm range. In our assays, at concentrations of 50µg/mL, the 480nm absorbance varied linearly with the Cu+ concentration from the detection limit of around 1µM Cu<sup>+</sup>, to approximately 20µM Cu<sup>+</sup>. As not only MymT and Csp1 bind copper in the Cu<sup>+</sup> form, but the assay also requires singly charged copper, the assays were optimised to include a suitable about of mild reducing agent to ensure reduction of the added CuSO<sub>4</sub> (releases Cu<sup>2+</sup>) to Cu<sup>+</sup>. After trying L(+)-Ascorbate and DL-Dithiothreitol, and L-Glutathione as candidates, L-Glutathione was selected as it was both mild enough to not damage biological material and efficient at reducing Cu<sup>2+</sup>. At >2-3 times the concentration of Cu<sup>2+</sup> in solution, L-Glutathione had maximum reductive activity against Cu<sup>2+</sup>.</p>
 +
<p> Modelling by our team suggested that this was because insufficient protein could be expressed to chelate the amount needed to be detectable on the assay (1μM detection limit).</p>
 +
<p>We purified MymTsfGFP using Nickel affinity chromatography followed by dialysis.  However were unable to detect copper chelation with the assay in our purified extracts when compared to a his-tagged GFP control. This is possibly because the flexible linked was susceptible to cleavage by proteases in the lysate meaning the protein we purified lacked the chelator portion. </p>
  
 +
===FLIM===
  
 +
We discovered a paper by Hötzer et al<sup>(4)</sup> that described how His-tagged GFP can be quenched by a copper ion binding to this His tag leading to a reduction in the fluorescence lifetime (the time the fluorophore spends in the excited state before returning to the ground state by emitting a photon.) They speculated that this could potentially be used as a <i>in vivo</i> copper assay.
  
 +
https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/3/32/FLIM_diagram_sam_oxford_2016.png
  
  
 +
As we had His-tagged our chelator-sfGFP constructs we were curious to see if this technique could be applied to our parts to measure copper chelation <i>in vivo</i> by our parts. We believe that two possibilities were likely:
  
 +
<ol>
 +
<li>Copper chelation by the chelator reduces the free copper concentration inside the cell meaning that less binds to the His tag and the fluorescence lifetime will be greater than a His-tagged sfGFP control</li>
 +
<li>Copper chelation by the chelator would allow additional quenching if copper was bound within the quenching radius of the fluorophore leading to a reduction in fluorescence lifetime compare with a sfGFP control</li>
 +
</ol>
  
 +
Lacking access to a fluorescence lifetime microscope ourselves we contacted Cardiff iGEM who had a FLIM machine in their bioimaging unit.
  
 +
We sent Cardiff iGEM our parts MymTsfGFP in pBAD and pCopA CueR sfGFP (as a control) in live MG1655 <i>E. coli</i> in agar tubes. Cardiff grew them overnight in 5ml of LB with 5μM copper with and without 2mM arabinose.
  
 +
The imaging unit spread each strain on slides and measured the fluorescence lifetime of three areas on each slide.
 +
<p> (Acquisition parameters: using the x63 water immersion objective with excitation at 483nm (71% intensity, pulse rate 40MHz) and emission via a BP500-550 filter. Scan resolution at 512 x 512 pixels at pixel size of 0.26 microns/pixel, 1AU pinhole.  Counts of >1000 per lifetime recording.)
  
 +
<p>FLIM images from one section of each slide:</p>
  
 +
https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/5/5d/FLIM_images_sam_oxford_2016.png
  
===Copper Chelation===
+
<p>As expected the pCopA CueR sfGFP control was fluorescent, with and without arabinose, with the mean fluorescence lifetime a consistent 2.6ns.</p>
 +
 
 +
When MymTsfGFP was induced the mean lifetime decreased to 2.3ns. As MymTsfGFP is was observed to be reliably expressed and because MymT is a small copper cluster separated form sfGFP by a small linker we believe that this represents additional quenching of the fluorphore by MymT-bound copper showing <i>in vivo</i> copper chelation.
 +
[[Image:T--Oxford--Sam-FLIM-sfGFP.jpg|400px|thumb|left|Histogram showing the fluorescence lifetime of sfGFP at 5μM copper]]
 +
[[Image:T--Oxford--Sam-FLIM-MymTsfGFP.jpg|400px|thumb|right|Histogram showing the fluorescence lifetime of Csp1sfGFP at 5μM copper]]
  
  
  
  
<p> This part contains the subpart MymTsfGFP (K1980003) which we tested separately. We cloned MymTsfGFP from Gblock into the shipping vector then transferred it into the pBAD, arabinose-inducible commercial expression vector.</p>
 
 
<p>We were unable however to detect copper chelation activity of MymTsfGFP when expressed from pBAD in MG1655 <i>E. coli</i> strain, using a BCS absorbance assay. Modelling by our team suggested that this was because insufficient protein could be expressed to chelate the amount needed to be detectable on the assay ( 2μM detection limit).</p>
 
<p>We purified this a version of this part with a C-terminal His tagged-sfGFP, but were still unable to detect copper chelation with the assay in our purified extracts.</p>
 
===FLIM===
 
<p>
 
We discovered a paper by Hötzer et al<sup>(3)</sup> that described how His-tagged GFP can be quenched by a copper ion binding to this His tag leading to a reduction in the fluorescence lifetime (the time the fluorophore spends in the excited state before returning to the ground state by emitting a photon.) They speculated that this could potentially be used as a <i>in vivo</i> copper assay.
 
</p>
 
https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/3/32/FLIM_diagram_sam_oxford_2016.png
 
  
<p>
 
As we had His-tagged our chelator-sfGFP constructs we were curious to see if this technique could be applied to our parts to measure copper chelation <i>in vivo</i> by our parts. We believe that two possibilities were likely:
 
</p>
 
<ol>
 
<li>Copper chelation by the chelator reduces the free copper concentration inside the cell meaning that less binds to the His tag and the fluorescence lifetime will be greater than a His-tagged sfGFP control</li>
 
<li>Copper chelation by the chelator would allow additional quenching if copper was bound within the quenching radius of the fluorophore leading to a reduction in fluorescence lifetime compare with a sfGFP control</li>
 
</ol>
 
<p>
 
Lacking access to a fluorescence lifetime microscope ourselves we contacted Cardiff iGEM who had a FLIM machine in their bioimaging unit. They very kindly agreed to run a few samples for us taking up over five hours of microscope time.
 
</p>
 
<p>
 
We sent Cardiff iGEM our parts MymTsfGFP in pBAD and pCopA CueR sfGFP (as a control) in live MG1655 <i>E. coli</i> in agar tubes. Cardiff grew them overnight in 5ml of LB with 5uM copper with and without 2mM arabinose.
 
</p>
 
<p>
 
The imaging unit spread each strain on slides and measured the fluorescence lifetime of three areas on each slide.</p>
 
<p> (Acquisition parameters: using the x63 water immersion objective with excitation at 483nm (71% intensity, pulse rate 40MHz) and emission via a BP500-550 filter. Scan resolution at 512 x 512 pixels at pixel size of 0.26 microns/pixel, 1AU pinhole.  Counts of >1000 per lifetime recording.)
 
</p>
 
<p>FLIM images from one section of each slide:</p>
 
https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/5/5d/FLIM_images_sam_oxford_2016.png
 
<p>
 
As expected the pCopA CueR sfGFP control was fluorescent, with and without arabinose, with the mean fluorescence lifetime a consistent 2.6ns. </p>
 
<p>
 
When MymTsfGFP was induced the mean lifetime decreased to 2.3ns. As MymTsfGFP is was observed to be reliably expressed and because MymT is a small copper cluster separated form sfGFP by a small linker we believe that this represents additional quenching of the fluorphore by MymT-bound copper showing <i>in vivo</i> copper chelation.</p>
 
[[Image:T--Oxford--Sam-FLIM-sfGFP.jpg|400px|thumb|left|Histogram showing the fluorescence lifetime of sfGFP at 5uM copper]]
 
[[Image:T--Oxford--Sam-FLIM-MymTsfGFP.jpg|400px|thumb|right|Histogram showing the fluorescence lifetime of Csp1sfGFP at 5uM copper]]
 
  
  
Line 177: Line 170:
  
  
 +
===Conclusion===
 +
Although we were unable to demonstrate the ability of this system to buffer free copper concentration we believe that this is because the range of concentrations over which the system operates is below the detection limit of our absorbance assay. Future work should be done to optimise the system so it can operate over a wider range of copper concentrations. This could possibly be done by changing the promoter sequence or the RBS strengths.
  
 +
We are please that the FLIM data we received suggests copper binding <i>in vivo</i>. With more time we would generate a standard curve of fluoresence lifetime at different copper concentrations so this could be quantitative. We would like to refine our protein purification and copper BCS assay techniques to hopefully so activity through this method.
  
===References===
+
==References==
 
<p> (1)  Danya J. Martell, Chandra P. Joshi, Ahmed Gaballa, Ace George Santiago, Tai-Yen Chen, Won Jung, John D. Helmann, and Peng Chen (2015) “Metalloregulator CueR biases RNA polymerase’s kinetic sampling of dead-end or open complex to repress or activate transcription” Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Nov 3; 112(44): 13467–13472</p>
 
<p> (1)  Danya J. Martell, Chandra P. Joshi, Ahmed Gaballa, Ace George Santiago, Tai-Yen Chen, Won Jung, John D. Helmann, and Peng Chen (2015) “Metalloregulator CueR biases RNA polymerase’s kinetic sampling of dead-end or open complex to repress or activate transcription” Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Nov 3; 112(44): 13467–13472</p>
  
Line 188: Line 184:
 
</p>
 
</p>
  
<p style="text-align: right"><i>Author: Andreas Hadjicharalambous</i></p>
+
<p style="text-align: right"><i>Authors: Andreas Hadjicharalambous and Sam Garforth</i></p>
  
 
<!-- Uncomment this to enable Functional Parameter display  
 
<!-- Uncomment this to enable Functional Parameter display  

Latest revision as of 21:52, 24 October 2016


pCopA MymT sfGFP with divergent CueR

Description

This part is our chelator MymTsfGFP (BBa_K1980003) expressed from this copper-sensitive promoter pCopA with the regulator of pCopA (CueR) expressed divergent from the promotor (BBa_K1980006).

Sequence and Features:


Assembly Compatibility:
  • 10
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
  • 12
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
    Illegal NheI site found at 438
    Illegal NheI site found at 461
  • 21
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
    Illegal XhoI site found at 1175
  • 23
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
  • 25
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
  • 1000
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]

Usage and Biology

Our project was to investigate a probiotic treatment for the copper-accumulation disorder: Wilson's disease. This required a system able to detect dietary copper, ideally in the range over which copper concentration changes after a meal (around 5-10μM). When copper is detected a copper chelating protein should be induced to lower the free copper concentration to prevent its absorption by the body.

CueR and pCopA

E. coli cells use a protein called CueR to regulate the cytoplasmic copper concentration. CueR is a MerR-type regulator with an interesting mechanism of action whereby it can behave as a net activator or a net repressor under different copper concentrations through interaction with RNA polymerase(1). CueR forms dimers consisting of three functional domains (a DNA-binding, a dimerisation and a metal-binding domain). The DNA binding domains bind to DNA inverted repeats called CueR boxes with the sequence:

CCTTCCNNNNNNGGAAGG

This box is present at the promoter regions of the copper exporting ATPase CopA, some molybdenum cofactor synthesis genes and the periplasmic copper oxidase protein CueO.(2)

MymTsfGFP

MymT is a small prokaryotic copper metallothein discovered in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. It can bind up to 7 copper ions but has a preference for 4-6. This version has a C terminal sfGFP with a C terminal hexahistidine tag for purification. The MymT and sfGFP are separated by a short hydrophilic, flexible linker.

Composite

Copper should induce the expression of the chelator via CueR. The chelator should reduce the free copper concentration therefore reducing it level of expression. This should in theory result in the free copper concentration falling to a low, stable level.

This is how the part is intended to work in vivo:

Schematic of BBa K1980012 using a yeast metallothein (PDB: 1AQR) to represent MymT

Experience

We cloned pCopA MymT sfGFP with divergent expressed CueR from a gBlock into the shipping plasmid pSB1C3. E. coli strain MG1655 was transformed using the specific recombinant plasmid and a 5ml culture of a transformed colony was grown overnight. The functionality of the construct was tested using plate reading, flow cytometry and microscopy

Plate Reader

The results of a plate reader experiment with different copper concentrations after four hours. Error bars show standard deviation of four repeats

We tested the promoter with the fluorescent protein sfGFP (a form of GFP with excitation/emission maxima at 485-512nm and 520nm).

To account for the number of cells present at different copper concentrations and different times we measured the optical density (OD) as a proportional measure of the number of cells present.

A range of copper concentrations were prepared from stock solutions. A large volume plate was then prepared with 10μl of copper solution, 10μl of overnight culture and 980μl of broth with antibiotic. This resulted in a 1 in 100 dilution of the copper solutions prepared.

This large-volume plate was then centrifuged to mix the solutions and then 200μl transferred to a small-volume plate with a clear lid and then placed in the plate reader.

Four biological repeats of this part at ten different copper concentrations were measured as well as four repeats of a negative control (The NC part from the interlab study) and a positive control (The constitutive GFP expressing, PC part from the Interlab study).

The plate reader measured the fluorescence and OD every ten minutes for at least 12 hours, shaking between measurements.





Flow cytometry

The population distribution of this part at different copper concentrations as measured by flow cytometry

Flow cytometry is a technique whereby cells are passed individually into the path of a beam of light. The frequency range of incident light can be adjusted to allow excitation of specific fluorophores in the sample of cells. Downstream detectors can measure fluorescent emission, and this data can be used to quantify the amount of fluorophore in each cell.

To ensure comparability of experiments, all cells were grown for 3-4hrs (until entrance into the exponential growth phase) at 37°C and 225rpm shaking in the presence of the inducer before measurement. This allowed adequate time for activation of expression by the promotor systems. The negative control used in all cases were MG1655 bacteria containing an empty shipping plasmid. As these did not contain any fluorescent molecules, this population could be used to set the negative “gate” (i.e. the background fluorescence of the bacterial cells). Although the experiments were tedious as every sample had to be measured manually, the results were of remarkably high quality, were clearly interpretable, and fit very well with the other experimental data.









Microscopy

Microscopy performed on this part at different copper concentrations. Fluorescent, differential interference contrast channels and a composite shown

Microscopy was done in order to visually confirm the plate reader and flow cytometer experiments.

The experiment started with 5ml overnight cultures containing the appropriate antibiotic. Then in the morning 100μl of each colony was pipetted into 5ml of fresh LB with antibiotic and a range of copper concentrations and grown till the OD reached 0.4-0.6.

A flask of 1% agarose made with MilliQ was melted. 200μl of this was placed on a slide between two coverslips, flattened to get a nice smooth surface where the bacteria are immobile. 20μl of the culture are then added. The slide was then be viewed under a fluorescence microscope.

After finding the correct focal plane the slide was moved to find as many cells as possible to image. After focusing again an image of the DIC and fluorescence channels was obtained.

Absorbance Assay

Separately MymTsfGFP was cloned from Gblock (BBa_K1980002) into the shipping vector then transferred it into the pBAD, arabinose-inducible commercial expression vector.

We were unable however to detect a drop in solution copper concentration due to copper chelation activity of MymT when expressed from pBAD in MG1655 E. coli strain, using an absorbance assay. Performing a similar procedure with this part also showed no measurable drop in copper concentration.

The assay used was the reagent Bathocuproine disulphonic Acid (BCS). BCS is colourless in the absence of Cu+ but upon exposure to Cu+, BCS forms complexes with Cu+ and absorbs strongly in the 480nm range. In our assays, at concentrations of 50µg/mL, the 480nm absorbance varied linearly with the Cu+ concentration from the detection limit of around 1µM Cu+, to approximately 20µM Cu+. As not only MymT and Csp1 bind copper in the Cu+ form, but the assay also requires singly charged copper, the assays were optimised to include a suitable about of mild reducing agent to ensure reduction of the added CuSO4 (releases Cu2+) to Cu+. After trying L(+)-Ascorbate and DL-Dithiothreitol, and L-Glutathione as candidates, L-Glutathione was selected as it was both mild enough to not damage biological material and efficient at reducing Cu2+. At >2-3 times the concentration of Cu2+ in solution, L-Glutathione had maximum reductive activity against Cu2+.

Modelling by our team suggested that this was because insufficient protein could be expressed to chelate the amount needed to be detectable on the assay (1μM detection limit).

We purified MymTsfGFP using Nickel affinity chromatography followed by dialysis. However were unable to detect copper chelation with the assay in our purified extracts when compared to a his-tagged GFP control. This is possibly because the flexible linked was susceptible to cleavage by proteases in the lysate meaning the protein we purified lacked the chelator portion.

FLIM

We discovered a paper by Hötzer et al(4) that described how His-tagged GFP can be quenched by a copper ion binding to this His tag leading to a reduction in the fluorescence lifetime (the time the fluorophore spends in the excited state before returning to the ground state by emitting a photon.) They speculated that this could potentially be used as a in vivo copper assay.

FLIM_diagram_sam_oxford_2016.png


As we had His-tagged our chelator-sfGFP constructs we were curious to see if this technique could be applied to our parts to measure copper chelation in vivo by our parts. We believe that two possibilities were likely:

  1. Copper chelation by the chelator reduces the free copper concentration inside the cell meaning that less binds to the His tag and the fluorescence lifetime will be greater than a His-tagged sfGFP control
  2. Copper chelation by the chelator would allow additional quenching if copper was bound within the quenching radius of the fluorophore leading to a reduction in fluorescence lifetime compare with a sfGFP control

Lacking access to a fluorescence lifetime microscope ourselves we contacted Cardiff iGEM who had a FLIM machine in their bioimaging unit.

We sent Cardiff iGEM our parts MymTsfGFP in pBAD and pCopA CueR sfGFP (as a control) in live MG1655 E. coli in agar tubes. Cardiff grew them overnight in 5ml of LB with 5μM copper with and without 2mM arabinose.

The imaging unit spread each strain on slides and measured the fluorescence lifetime of three areas on each slide.

(Acquisition parameters: using the x63 water immersion objective with excitation at 483nm (71% intensity, pulse rate 40MHz) and emission via a BP500-550 filter. Scan resolution at 512 x 512 pixels at pixel size of 0.26 microns/pixel, 1AU pinhole. Counts of >1000 per lifetime recording.) <p>FLIM images from one section of each slide:

FLIM_images_sam_oxford_2016.png

As expected the pCopA CueR sfGFP control was fluorescent, with and without arabinose, with the mean fluorescence lifetime a consistent 2.6ns.

When MymTsfGFP was induced the mean lifetime decreased to 2.3ns. As MymTsfGFP is was observed to be reliably expressed and because MymT is a small copper cluster separated form sfGFP by a small linker we believe that this represents additional quenching of the fluorphore by MymT-bound copper showing in vivo copper chelation.

Histogram showing the fluorescence lifetime of sfGFP at 5μM copper
Histogram showing the fluorescence lifetime of Csp1sfGFP at 5μM copper


















Conclusion

Although we were unable to demonstrate the ability of this system to buffer free copper concentration we believe that this is because the range of concentrations over which the system operates is below the detection limit of our absorbance assay. Future work should be done to optimise the system so it can operate over a wider range of copper concentrations. This could possibly be done by changing the promoter sequence or the RBS strengths.

We are please that the FLIM data we received suggests copper binding in vivo. With more time we would generate a standard curve of fluoresence lifetime at different copper concentrations so this could be quantitative. We would like to refine our protein purification and copper BCS assay techniques to hopefully so activity through this method.

References

(1) Danya J. Martell, Chandra P. Joshi, Ahmed Gaballa, Ace George Santiago, Tai-Yen Chen, Won Jung, John D. Helmann, and Peng Chen (2015) “Metalloregulator CueR biases RNA polymerase’s kinetic sampling of dead-end or open complex to repress or activate transcription” Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Nov 3; 112(44): 13467–13472

(2) Yamamoto K, Ishihama A. (2005) “Transcriptional response of Escherichia coli to external copper.” Mol Microbiol. 2005 Apr;56(1):215-27

(3) Hötzer B., Ivanov R., Altmeier S., Kappl R., Jung G., (2011) "Determination of copper(II) ion concentration by lifetime measurements of green fluorescent protein." Journal of Fluorescence, 21(6), pp. 2143-2153. doi: 10.1007/s10895-011-0916-1

Authors: Andreas Hadjicharalambous and Sam Garforth