Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K1421006:Experience"
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
===Applications of BBa_K1421006=== | ===Applications of BBa_K1421006=== | ||
| + | ===Characterization of BBa_K1421006-Arizona_State 2016=== | ||
| + | Authors: Ernesto Luna, Brady Dennison, Cassandra Barrett, Jimmy Xu, Jiaqi Wu, Dr. Karmella Haynes | ||
| + | Our team helped increase characterization of the part Bba_K1421006(RpaI). This part was tested against its ability to induce the part BBa_F2620 by the Canton Lab(MIT). This part outputs PoPS as a Receiver Device combined with LuxR. An induction test on BBa_F2620 had been done by Dr. Barry Canton (2008), but they tested GFP production over various AHL concentrations, while our test was an 8-hour GFP read over time for 2 AHL concentrations (10 and 50%). In addition, the Canton test utilized synthetic AHLs while our test utilized AHLs produced via an E.coli chassis. A visual induction test was also done, plating the Sender alongside a GFP positive control, negative receiver control, and F2620. | ||
| + | |||
| + | As shown below, RpaI was able to induce F2620 in this visual induction, as colonies in the top right section did produce GFP. These results indicate that RpaI will crosstalk with LuxR and F2620. | ||
| + | <div style="text-align: center;">[[File:T--Arizona_State--rpaplate.png]]</div> | ||
| + | <div style="text-align: center;">Plate with GFP+(top left), Sender(center), -Receiver(bottom) and F2620(top right)</div> | ||
| + | |||
| + | The figure below compares RpaI at 10% and 50% concentrations alongside the native AHL system LuxI at 10% and 50% concentrations. RpaI is shown to induce F2620, but to a lesser degree than LuxI. This affirms that F2620 is capable of being induced by RpaI synthesized within BL21(DE3) E. coli, supporting the notion that crosstalk is occurring. This result corroborates the plate induction result, indicating that p-Coumaroyl AHL will induce F2620. | ||
| + | <div style="text-align: center;">[[File:T--Arizona_State--rpaind.png]]</div> | ||
| + | <div style="text-align: center;">GFP absorbance from RpaI over time</div> | ||
| + | |||
| + | ====AHL Disposal Test==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | The final experiment conducted using this part aimed to determine proper safe disposal procedures for the p-Coumaroyl HSL. This AHL molecule is capable of crosstalk with potentially pathogenic strains of bacteria, and proper disposal of these AHLs should be an important biosafety measure taken. S.A. Borchardt had already tested the susceptibility of AHLs to bleach and found that 3-oxo AHLs were easily broken down by bleach while other AHLs were not. Our experiment aimed to test the application of standard EH&S sanitation protocols on AHLs (10% bleach solution and autoclaving). The figure below indicates that AHLs produced by RpaI were NOT properly deactivated by a 10% bleach solution. This was the expected result, as RpaI does not produce a 3-oxo AHL, which should not have been destroyed by bleach. | ||
| + | <div style="text-align: center;">[[File:T--Arizona_State--rpableachgraph.png]]</div> | ||
| + | <div style="text-align: center;">GFP absorbance from RpaI over time</div> | ||
| + | |||
| + | A standard 15 minute Liquid autoclave cycle was also used to treat an extracted AHL solution. The figure below indicates that RpaI was nearly completely destroyed via autoclaving. This was the expected result, as the high pressure and temperatures should deactivate any AHL molecules present. | ||
| + | <div style="text-align: center;">[[File:T--Arizona State--rpaautoclavegraph1.png]]</div> | ||
| + | <div style="text-align: center;">GFP absorbance from RpaI over time</div> | ||
| + | |||
| + | ====Conclusion==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | The results demonstrate that RpaI was able to effectively induce F2620 after being extracted. The Rpa results were inconsistent, which showed varying levels of induction when treated with bleach, with no indication of complete AHL inactivation. According to the autoclave results, a standard 15 min liquid procedure is able to degrade nearly all AHLs. The extreme pressure and temperature generated by the autoclave was more than enough to remove any threat posed by these AHL samples. In summary, our data suggests that, for RpaI, bleach is unable to effectively degrade the Rpa AHL but autoclaving is sufficient. | ||
===User Reviews=== | ===User Reviews=== | ||
<!-- DON'T DELETE --><partinfo>BBa_K1421006 StartReviews</partinfo> | <!-- DON'T DELETE --><partinfo>BBa_K1421006 StartReviews</partinfo> | ||
Latest revision as of 05:27, 24 October 2016
This experience page is provided so that any user may enter their experience using this part.
Please enter
how you used this part and how it worked out.
Applications of BBa_K1421006
Characterization of BBa_K1421006-Arizona_State 2016
Authors: Ernesto Luna, Brady Dennison, Cassandra Barrett, Jimmy Xu, Jiaqi Wu, Dr. Karmella Haynes
Our team helped increase characterization of the part Bba_K1421006(RpaI). This part was tested against its ability to induce the part BBa_F2620 by the Canton Lab(MIT). This part outputs PoPS as a Receiver Device combined with LuxR. An induction test on BBa_F2620 had been done by Dr. Barry Canton (2008), but they tested GFP production over various AHL concentrations, while our test was an 8-hour GFP read over time for 2 AHL concentrations (10 and 50%). In addition, the Canton test utilized synthetic AHLs while our test utilized AHLs produced via an E.coli chassis. A visual induction test was also done, plating the Sender alongside a GFP positive control, negative receiver control, and F2620.
As shown below, RpaI was able to induce F2620 in this visual induction, as colonies in the top right section did produce GFP. These results indicate that RpaI will crosstalk with LuxR and F2620.
The figure below compares RpaI at 10% and 50% concentrations alongside the native AHL system LuxI at 10% and 50% concentrations. RpaI is shown to induce F2620, but to a lesser degree than LuxI. This affirms that F2620 is capable of being induced by RpaI synthesized within BL21(DE3) E. coli, supporting the notion that crosstalk is occurring. This result corroborates the plate induction result, indicating that p-Coumaroyl AHL will induce F2620.
AHL Disposal Test
The final experiment conducted using this part aimed to determine proper safe disposal procedures for the p-Coumaroyl HSL. This AHL molecule is capable of crosstalk with potentially pathogenic strains of bacteria, and proper disposal of these AHLs should be an important biosafety measure taken. S.A. Borchardt had already tested the susceptibility of AHLs to bleach and found that 3-oxo AHLs were easily broken down by bleach while other AHLs were not. Our experiment aimed to test the application of standard EH&S sanitation protocols on AHLs (10% bleach solution and autoclaving). The figure below indicates that AHLs produced by RpaI were NOT properly deactivated by a 10% bleach solution. This was the expected result, as RpaI does not produce a 3-oxo AHL, which should not have been destroyed by bleach.
A standard 15 minute Liquid autoclave cycle was also used to treat an extracted AHL solution. The figure below indicates that RpaI was nearly completely destroyed via autoclaving. This was the expected result, as the high pressure and temperatures should deactivate any AHL molecules present.
Conclusion
The results demonstrate that RpaI was able to effectively induce F2620 after being extracted. The Rpa results were inconsistent, which showed varying levels of induction when treated with bleach, with no indication of complete AHL inactivation. According to the autoclave results, a standard 15 min liquid procedure is able to degrade nearly all AHLs. The extreme pressure and temperature generated by the autoclave was more than enough to remove any threat posed by these AHL samples. In summary, our data suggests that, for RpaI, bleach is unable to effectively degrade the Rpa AHL but autoclaving is sufficient.
User Reviews
UNIQae969bc26bf06763-partinfo-00000000-QINU UNIQae969bc26bf06763-partinfo-00000001-QINU