Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K2132001"
(15 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | |||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
<partinfo>BBa_K2132001 short</partinfo> | <partinfo>BBa_K2132001 short</partinfo> | ||
− | This is the subunit of | + | This is the subunit of major proteins of E. Coli biofilm Curli system linked to SpyCatcher and HisTag. The two added protein tag and domain can bring new functions to biofilms . For example, SpyTag can covalently interact with any fusion protein containing Spytcatcher, While His tag can facilitate purification, and endow biofilms with specific binding ability towards NTA-decorated nanoparticles, as demonstrated below |
<!-- Add more about the biology of this part here | <!-- Add more about the biology of this part here | ||
Line 11: | Line 10: | ||
<span class='h3bb'>Sequence and Features</span> | <span class='h3bb'>Sequence and Features</span> | ||
<partinfo>BBa_K2132001 SequenceAndFeatures</partinfo> | <partinfo>BBa_K2132001 SequenceAndFeatures</partinfo> | ||
+ | <html> | ||
+ | <h3>Characterization</h3> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | Four different experiments were conducted to characterize this biobrick: | ||
+ | <ul> | ||
+ | <li> TEM: visualization of His-CsgA-SpyCacher-histag mutant biofilm </li> | ||
+ | <li> QDs’ Fluorescence Binding Test </li> | ||
+ | <li> TEM: visualization of binding test with AuNPs </li> | ||
+ | <li> Spy System Functional Test </li></ul> | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | <h4> TEM: visualization of His-CsgA-SpyCacher-histag mutant biofilm </h4> | ||
− | < | + | <figure align="center"> |
− | === | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/7/7d/Shanghaitechchina_hsch_part.png" width="50%" height="50%"> |
− | < | + | <figcaption> |
− | < | + | <b>Fig. 1</b>: Biofilms composed by His-CsgA-SpyCacher-histag subunits. After scrutinization, biofilm can viewed around the '''E.coli''' |
+ | </figcaption> | ||
+ | </figure> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <h4>QDs’ Fluoresence Binding Test </h4> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | In order to test the effect of binding between His-CsgA-SpyCacher-histag mutant and inorganic nanoparticles, we apply same amount of suspended QDs solution into M63 medium which has cultured biofilm for 72h. After 30-min incubation, we used PBS to mildly wash the well, and the result was consistent with our anticipation: On the left, His-CsgA-SpyCacher-histag mutant was induced and secreted biofilm, and firmly attached with QDS and thus showed bright fluorescence. Therefore, we ensure the stable coordinate bonds between His-CsgA-SpyCacher-histag mutant and QDs can manage to prevent QDs from being taken away by liquid flow. | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <figure align="center"> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/5/56/Shanghaitechchina_hisCsgASpyCatcherHistag%2BQD.png" width="50%"> | ||
+ | <figcaption> | ||
+ | <b>Fig. 2</b>: Binding between His-CsgA-SpyCacher-histag mutant and inorganic CdS QDs. | ||
+ | </figcaption> | ||
+ | </figure> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <h4> TEM: visualization of binding test with AuNPs</h4> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | transmission electron microscopy(TEM) visualize the binding effect of His-CsgA-SpyCacher-histag mutant E.coli with AuNPs. From the picture, it shows biofilm areas are attached by AuNPs and thus confirm the viability of histag on His-CsgA-SpyCacher-histag mutant biofilm. | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <figure align="center"> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/e/e8/Shanghaitechchina_HSCH%2BAu.png" width="40%" > | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <figcaption> | ||
+ | <b>Fig. 3</b>: Biofilms composed by His-CsgA-SpyCacher-histag subunits bind with AuNPs. | ||
+ | </figcaption> | ||
+ | </figure> | ||
+ | <h4>Spy System Functional Test</h4> | ||
+ | <p>As figure illustrated, his-CsgA-SpyCatcher-his mutant incubated with mcherry-SpyTag show a clear biofilm-associated mcherry fluorescence signal, which indicates the accurate conformation and function of the SpyTag and SpyCatcher linkage system. The third figure is merged by the first and second figures of each sample are snapped respectively under green laser field with 558 nm wavelength and bright field of fluorescence microscopy, Zeiss Axio Imager Z2. As for controls, strains secreted CsgA–Histag and ΔCsgA both are unable to specifically attach to SpyTag thus no distinct localization highlight of red fluorescence on E.coli. That to a large extent proved the specificity of our desired linkage between SpyTag and SpyCatcher system. </p> | ||
+ | <figure align="center"> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/9/9f/Shanghaitechchina_spy_part.png" width="60%" height="60%" > | ||
+ | <figcaption> | ||
+ | <b>Fig. 3</b>: The first figures of each sample are snapped under green laser of 558 nm wavelength and mcherry-SpyTags emit red fluorescence. The second figures of each sample are snapped under bright field of fluorescence microscopy and we can clearly see a group of bacteria. The third figures are merged by the first and second ones. All photos are taken by Zeiss Axio Imager Z2. | ||
+ | </figcaption> | ||
+ | </figure> | ||
+ | |||
+ | </html> |
Latest revision as of 11:55, 19 October 2016
CsgASpyCatcherHisTag
This is the subunit of major proteins of E. Coli biofilm Curli system linked to SpyCatcher and HisTag. The two added protein tag and domain can bring new functions to biofilms . For example, SpyTag can covalently interact with any fusion protein containing Spytcatcher, While His tag can facilitate purification, and endow biofilms with specific binding ability towards NTA-decorated nanoparticles, as demonstrated below
Sequence and Features
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
- 21INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]Illegal XhoI site found at 841
- 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
- 1000COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]
Characterization
Four different experiments were conducted to characterize this biobrick:
- TEM: visualization of His-CsgA-SpyCacher-histag mutant biofilm
- QDs’ Fluorescence Binding Test
- TEM: visualization of binding test with AuNPs
- Spy System Functional Test
TEM: visualization of His-CsgA-SpyCacher-histag mutant biofilm
QDs’ Fluoresence Binding Test
In order to test the effect of binding between His-CsgA-SpyCacher-histag mutant and inorganic nanoparticles, we apply same amount of suspended QDs solution into M63 medium which has cultured biofilm for 72h. After 30-min incubation, we used PBS to mildly wash the well, and the result was consistent with our anticipation: On the left, His-CsgA-SpyCacher-histag mutant was induced and secreted biofilm, and firmly attached with QDS and thus showed bright fluorescence. Therefore, we ensure the stable coordinate bonds between His-CsgA-SpyCacher-histag mutant and QDs can manage to prevent QDs from being taken away by liquid flow.
TEM: visualization of binding test with AuNPs
transmission electron microscopy(TEM) visualize the binding effect of His-CsgA-SpyCacher-histag mutant E.coli with AuNPs. From the picture, it shows biofilm areas are attached by AuNPs and thus confirm the viability of histag on His-CsgA-SpyCacher-histag mutant biofilm.
Spy System Functional Test
As figure illustrated, his-CsgA-SpyCatcher-his mutant incubated with mcherry-SpyTag show a clear biofilm-associated mcherry fluorescence signal, which indicates the accurate conformation and function of the SpyTag and SpyCatcher linkage system. The third figure is merged by the first and second figures of each sample are snapped respectively under green laser field with 558 nm wavelength and bright field of fluorescence microscopy, Zeiss Axio Imager Z2. As for controls, strains secreted CsgA–Histag and ΔCsgA both are unable to specifically attach to SpyTag thus no distinct localization highlight of red fluorescence on E.coli. That to a large extent proved the specificity of our desired linkage between SpyTag and SpyCatcher system.