Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K1899006"
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
<partinfo>BBa_K1899006 short</partinfo>
 
<partinfo>BBa_K1899006 short</partinfo>
  
−
The construct aims at investigating any interference caused by lacl repressor on promoter <i>PhlFp</i>.
+
This construct aims at investigating any interference caused by Lacl repressor on promoter <i>phlFp</i>.
  
 
===Results===
 
===Results===
−
 
+
The fold change between construct A (pSB3K3-BBa_E0240-<i>phlFp</i>) and negative control (pSB3K3-BBa_E0240), and that of construct C (pSB3K3-BBa_J23101-B0032-C0012-B1006- <i>phlFp</i> -E0240) were both approximately 13.2. Since their RFU are similar, it indicated that there is no cross-talk between <i>lacp</i> and <i>phlFp</i> (<bbpart>(BBa_K1899004</bbpart>).  
−
https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/thumb/2/25/Comparison_of_the_Strength_of_tetR_and_PhlFp.jpeg/748px-Comparison_of_the_Strength_of_tetR_and_PhlFp.jpeg
+
<br>
−
 
+
[[File:IGEM2016_HKUST_phlFK1899006.png|thumb|600px|center|<b>Fig 1. Comparison on fluorescence expression levels of construct A (BBa_<i>phlFp</i>-E0240) and construct C (BBa_J23101-B0032-C0012-B1006- <i>phlFp</i> -E0240)</b>. Negative control represents BBa_E0240. Characterization was done using <i>E. coli</i> strain JW0336. Cells were first precultured overnight and were subcultured to mid-log phase where GFP emission measurements were made using an EnVision® multilabel reader. This result was obtained by combining 3 characterization data obtained in 3 different days. Error bar present SD from 3 biological replicates.]]
−
<b>Fig a) Comparison of Technical Triplicate Results of pSB3K3-BBa_J23101-B0032-C0012-B1006- PhlFp -E0240 and  pSB3K3-PhlFp - BBa_E0240</b>
+
−
<br><br>
+
−
The fold change between <b>pSB3K3-PhlFp - BBa_E0240 and negative control (pSB3K3-BBa_E0240)</b> is 13.2, which is same as that of <b>pSB3K3-BBa_J23101-B0032-C0012-B1006- PhlFp -E0240</b>.Mean and standard error mean(SEM) are calculated and represented by the height of the bar and the error bar respectively. Since their RFU are similar and almost the same, it proves that there is no cross-talk between <i>lacp</i> and <i>Phlfp</i>(<bbpart>(BBa_K1899004</bbpart>).  
+
−
 
+
−
 
+
−
 
+
  
  

Latest revision as of 15:37, 18 October 2016


J23101-B0032-lacl-B1006- phlFp-GFP

This construct aims at investigating any interference caused by Lacl repressor on promoter phlFp.

Results

The fold change between construct A (pSB3K3-BBa_E0240-phlFp) and negative control (pSB3K3-BBa_E0240), and that of construct C (pSB3K3-BBa_J23101-B0032-C0012-B1006- phlFp -E0240) were both approximately 13.2. Since their RFU are similar, it indicated that there is no cross-talk between lacp and phlFp (BBa_K1899004).

Fig 1. Comparison on fluorescence expression levels of construct A (BBa_phlFp-E0240) and construct C (BBa_J23101-B0032-C0012-B1006- phlFp -E0240). Negative control represents BBa_E0240. Characterization was done using E. coli strain JW0336. Cells were first precultured overnight and were subcultured to mid-log phase where GFP emission measurements were made using an EnVision® multilabel reader. This result was obtained by combining 3 characterization data obtained in 3 different days. Error bar present SD from 3 biological replicates.


Sequence and Features


Assembly Compatibility:
  • 10
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
  • 12
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
    Illegal NheI site found at 7
    Illegal NheI site found at 30
  • 21
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
    Illegal BglII site found at 1209
  • 23
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
  • 25
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
  • 1000
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]
    Illegal BsaI.rc site found at 2007