|
|
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
| Line 5: |
Line 5: |
| | | | |
| | ===Applications of BBa_K1899006=== | | ===Applications of BBa_K1899006=== |
| − | Characterisation Result
| |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| − | https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/thumb/3/3c/T--Hong_Kong_HKUST--Phlfp_C.jpg/693px-T--Hong_Kong_HKUST--Phlfp_C.jpg
| |
| − |
| |
| − | [[File:T--Hong_Kong_HKUST--Phlfp_C.jpg|thumb|600px|center|<b>Fig 1. Comparison on the strength of <i>phlFp</i>, <i>tetp</i> and <i>lacp</i>.</b> Negative control represents BBa_E0240. Characterization was done using <i>E. coli</i> strain JW0336. Cells were first precultured overnight and were subcultured to mid-log phase where GFP emission measurements were made using an EnVision® multilabel reader. This result was obtained by combining 3 characterization data obtained in 3 different days. Error bar present SD from 3 biological replicates.]]
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Fig a)<b> Comparison of Technical Triplicate Results of pSB3K3-BBa_J23101-B0032-C0012-B1006- PhlFp -E0240 and pSB3K3-PhlFp - BBa_E0240</b>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | The fold change between <b>pSB3K3-PhlFp - BBa_E0240 and negative control (pSB3K3-BBa_E0240)<b> is 13.2, which is same as that of <b>pSB3K3-BBa_J23101-B0032-C0012-B1006- PhlFp -E0240<b>. Since their RFU are similar and almost the same, it proves that there is no cross-talk between <i>lacp<i> and <i>Phlfp<i>(<bbpart>BBa_K1899004<bbpart>).
| |
| | | | |
| | | | |
Latest revision as of 23:38, 17 October 2016
This experience page is provided so that any user may enter their experience using this part.
Please enter
how you used this part and how it worked out.
Applications of BBa_K1899006
User Reviews
UNIQ372e0de10c812e94-partinfo-00000000-QINU
UNIQ372e0de10c812e94-partinfo-00000001-QINU
