Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa C0071"
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
[[Image:prhl2.png|thumb|center|400px|Fig.2 The colonies of transformants with a rhlR (left) or a rhlR-LVA right]]<br> | [[Image:prhl2.png|thumb|center|400px|Fig.2 The colonies of transformants with a rhlR (left) or a rhlR-LVA right]]<br> | ||
+ | If you want more information, you see [http://2016.igem.org/Team:Tokyo_Tech our work in Tokyo_Tech 2016 wiki] and <partinfo>BBa_K1949060</partinfo>! | ||
<span class='h3bb'>Sequence and Features</span> | <span class='h3bb'>Sequence and Features</span> |
Revision as of 04:45, 16 October 2016
rhlR repressor/activator from P. aeruginosa PA3477 (+LVA)
Transcriptional regulator, in complex with N-butyryl-HSL, RhlR binds to the Rhl promoter
Usage and Biology
Transcriptional regulator, binds with N-butyryl-HSL
Characterization
Group: Tokyo Tech 2016
Author: Yoshio Takata
We simulated our final genetic circuits and found that the circuits did not work, because Prhl activity was too weak compared to Plux. (see the Modeling page and the Only Assay page). We therefore considered using the improved Prhl (BBa_K1529310, BBa_K1529300) established by Tokyo_Tech 2014, but we noticed that they were inappropriate for two reasons (see the Discussion). Then, we decided to improve Prhl Promoter and obtain our original improved Prhl (Noticeable Mutant) (BBa_K1949060), hereafter referred to as Prhl(NM), that suited our goal.
During improving Prhl(R0071), we characterize this part. So, we describe that characterization.
We found that Prhl(RL) (BBa_K1529300) activity was weak and the expression level depended on LVA tag (Fig.1); LVA-tagged proteins are prone to be degraded by cellular proteases. Prhl(LR) (BBa_K1529310) activity was strong and unexpectedly reacted with C12 (crosstalk) (Fig.3).
The colonies of transformants with a rhlR (BBa_C0171) plasmid looked rough and the growth rate was low(Fig.2-left), while the colonies of transformants with a rhlR-LVA (BBa_C0071) plasmid looked smooth and the growth rate was normal(Fig.2-right). However, the reason for this result is unclear.
If you want more information, you see [http://2016.igem.org/Team:Tokyo_Tech our work in Tokyo_Tech 2016 wiki] and BBa_K1949060!
Sequence and Features
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
- 21INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]Illegal BamHI site found at 240
- 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
- 1000INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]Illegal BsaI site found at 715