Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K2009820"
 
(11 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
 
<partinfo>BBa_K2009820 short</partinfo>
 
<partinfo>BBa_K2009820 short</partinfo>
  
−
<p style="font-weight:bold; font-size:40px;">introduction</p>
+
<p style="font-weight:bold; font-size:20px;">Sequence And Features</p>
 +
<partinfo>BBa_K2009820 SequenceAndFeatures</partinfo>
  
 +
<p style="font-weight:bold; font-size:20px;">introduction</p>
 +
<hr>
 
<p > </p>
 
<p > </p>
  
−
<a href="2016.igem.org"> </a>
+
 
 
sfGFP11 length: 48bp
 
sfGFP11 length: 48bp
 +
<br>
 
Derived from:synthesis from Sangon
 
Derived from:synthesis from Sangon
  
 
sfGFP11——PSB1C3 is an expression plasmid which insert sfGFP11 into PSB1C3.
 
sfGFP11——PSB1C3 is an expression plasmid which insert sfGFP11 into PSB1C3.
−
<hr/>
+
before sfGFP11, we add a linker(gatggagggtctggtggcggatca) to achieve our goal.SfGFP11 is a part of GFP(from 214bp to 230bp), GFP has been mutated to improve its solubility and self-associating activity. When it express, it will emit green fluorescences lightly under the fluorescence microscope.
−
before sfGFP11, we add a linker(gatggagggtctggtggcggatca) to achieve our goal.SfGFP11 is a part of GFP(from 214bp to 230bp), GFP has been mutated to improve its solubilityand self-associating activity. When it express, it will emit green fluorescenceslightly under the fluorescence microscope.
+
  
−
We try to find anideal protein tag to be work both invivo and invitro and it can provide a sensitive measurable signalwhich don’t need external chemical reagents or substrates. Finally we find away to accomplish this goal—— dividing GFP into sfGFP1-10and sfGFP11. Either the sfGFP1-10 or sfGFP11 will emit green fluorescence slightly under the fluorescencemicroscope. However, when sfGFP1-10 and sfGFP11 express insame cell, they will interact each other and emit more intense fluorescence thaneach of them. The split GFP system is simple and does not change fusion proteinsolubility.
+
We try to find anideal protein tag to be work both invivo and invitro and it can provide a sensitive measurable signal which don’t need external chemical reagents or substrates. Finally we find a way to accomplish this goal—— dividing GFP into sfGFP1-10and sfGFP11. Either the sfGFP1-10 or sfGFP11 will emit green fluorescence slightly under the fluorescence microscope. However, when sfGFP1-10 and sfGFP11 express insame cell, they will interact each other and emit more intense fluorescence than each of them. The split GFP system is simple and does not change fusion protein's solubility.
  
−
Usage and biology:The split GFP system has manypractical applications. Obtaining soluble, well-folded recombinant proteins fordownstream applications requires screening large numbers of protein variants (mutants,fragments, fusion tags, folding partners) and testing many expression orrefolding conditions.(Ste´phanieCabantous, Thomas C Terwilliger & Geoffrey S Waldo,2005)
+
Usage and biology:The split GFP system has many practical applications. Obtaining soluble, well-folded recombinant proteins for downstream applications requires screening large numbers of protein variants (mutants,fragments, fusion tags, folding partners) and testing many expression or refolding conditions.(Ste´phanie Cabantous, Thomas C Terwilliger & Geoffrey S Waldo,2005)
  
−
Part sequence
+
<p style="font-weight:bold; font-size:20px;">Part Sequence</p>
 +
<hr>
  
 
agagaccacatggtccttcatgagtatgtaaatgctgctgggattaca
 
agagaccacatggtccttcatgagtatgtaaatgctgctgggattaca
 
(All the sequence has been testified by Sangon)
 
(All the sequence has been testified by Sangon)
 +
<br>
 +
<p style="font-weight:bold; font-size:20px;">Results:</p>
 +
<br>
 +
This is the picture which shows E.coli containing the plasmid of sfGFP11 observed with excitation light.
 +
<html>
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/c/c7/T--USTC--sfGFP11_GFP.jpg" style="width: 60%;">
 +
</html>
 +
<br>
 +
This is the picture which shows E.coli containing the sfGFP11 plasmid and sfGFP1-10 plasmid observed with and excitation light.
 +
<html>
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/5/57/T--USTC--sfGFP11%2BsfGFP1-10_GFP.jpg" style="width: 60%;">
 +
</html>
 +
<br>
 +
If you want to see all pictures, please go to our notebook.
 +
<br>
 +
experimental data:
 +
<table border="1">
 +
<tr>
 +
  <td>sample</td>
 +
  <td>OD600</td>
 +
  <td>ABS</td>
 +
</tr>
 +
<tr>
 +
  <td>A10-1</td>
 +
  <td>2.541</td>
 +
  <td>8402</td>
 +
</tr>
 +
<tr>
 +
  <td>A10-2</td>
 +
  <td>1.486</td>
 +
  <td>5389</td>
 +
</tr>
 +
<tr>
 +
  <td>C11-1</td>
 +
  <td>2.539</td>
 +
  <td>9939</td>
 +
</tr>
 +
<tr>
 +
  <td>C11-2</td>
 +
  <td>2.230</td>
 +
  <td>8098</td>
 +
</tr>
 +
<tr>
 +
  <td>A+C-1</td>
 +
  <td>1.162</td>
 +
  <td>3078</td>
 +
</tr>
 +
<tr>
 +
  <td>A+C-2</td>
 +
  <td>1.077</td>
 +
  <td>2627</td>
 +
</tr>
 +
</table>
 +
The ideal results are the spilt GFP experiment in E-coli to verify the split GFP can function as our expectation, we transform the plamids containing sfGFP1-10 and the plasmids containing sfGFP11 respectively in BL21, cultivating the bacteria at 37°C and shacking at 250 rpm/min overnight. We use fluorescence microscope to observe bacteria under 100X objective lens. From these fluorescent images, we find that fluorescent intensity of sfGFP1-10 is stronger than fluorescent intensity of sfGFP11 and both of them are weak. It corresponds with our expectation that either of separate part of sfGFP have background expression and sfGFP1-10, which is longer, may be brighter after excitation.
 +
 +
However, when the PSB1C3 carrying the part of sfGFP11 and the PSB1A3 carrying the part of sfGFP1-10 ware expressed together in E.Coli, it doesn't present stronger fluorescence intensity than either plasmid is expressed in E.Coli respectively. There are a few reasons can explain it. Firstly, different metabolic stress of two plamids causes indistinct results. PSB1C3 carrying sfGFP11, whose gene length is shorter, may have higher expression level than PSB1A3 carry sfGFP1-10. Secondly, there is obvious fluorescence quenching after excitation. Therefore, results of fluorescent images and fluorescent images appear that co-expression of sfGFP1-10 and sfGFP11 has weaker fluorescence intensity. Thirdly, because sfGFP1-10 and sfGFP11 don’t express in E.Coli at 1:1 ratio, the collision probability may be lower than our expectation.
 +
 +
  
 
<!-- Add more about the biology of this part here
 
<!-- Add more about the biology of this part here
Line 29: Line 91:
  
 
<!-- -->   
 
<!-- -->   
−
<span class='h3bb'>Sequence and Features</span>
 
−
<partinfo>BBa_K2009820 SequenceAndFeatures</partinfo>
 
  
  

Latest revision as of 03:35, 16 October 2016


sfGFP11

Sequence And Features


Assembly Compatibility:
  • 10
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
  • 12
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
  • 21
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
  • 23
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
  • 25
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
  • 1000
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]
    Illegal BsaI.rc site found at 26

introduction


sfGFP11 length: 48bp
Derived from:synthesis from Sangon

sfGFP11——PSB1C3 is an expression plasmid which insert sfGFP11 into PSB1C3. before sfGFP11, we add a linker(gatggagggtctggtggcggatca) to achieve our goal.SfGFP11 is a part of GFP(from 214bp to 230bp), GFP has been mutated to improve its solubility and self-associating activity. When it express, it will emit green fluorescences lightly under the fluorescence microscope.

We try to find anideal protein tag to be work both invivo and invitro and it can provide a sensitive measurable signal which don’t need external chemical reagents or substrates. Finally we find a way to accomplish this goal—— dividing GFP into sfGFP1-10and sfGFP11. Either the sfGFP1-10 or sfGFP11 will emit green fluorescence slightly under the fluorescence microscope. However, when sfGFP1-10 and sfGFP11 express insame cell, they will interact each other and emit more intense fluorescence than each of them. The split GFP system is simple and does not change fusion protein's solubility.

Usage and biology:The split GFP system has many practical applications. Obtaining soluble, well-folded recombinant proteins for downstream applications requires screening large numbers of protein variants (mutants,fragments, fusion tags, folding partners) and testing many expression or refolding conditions.(Ste´phanie Cabantous, Thomas C Terwilliger & Geoffrey S Waldo,2005)

Part Sequence

agagaccacatggtccttcatgagtatgtaaatgctgctgggattaca (All the sequence has been testified by Sangon)

Results:


This is the picture which shows E.coli containing the plasmid of sfGFP11 observed with excitation light.
This is the picture which shows E.coli containing the sfGFP11 plasmid and sfGFP1-10 plasmid observed with and excitation light.
If you want to see all pictures, please go to our notebook.
experimental data:

sample OD600 ABS
A10-1 2.541 8402
A10-2 1.486 5389
C11-1 2.539 9939
C11-2 2.230 8098
A+C-1 1.162 3078
A+C-2 1.077 2627

The ideal results are the spilt GFP experiment in E-coli to verify the split GFP can function as our expectation, we transform the plamids containing sfGFP1-10 and the plasmids containing sfGFP11 respectively in BL21, cultivating the bacteria at 37°C and shacking at 250 rpm/min overnight. We use fluorescence microscope to observe bacteria under 100X objective lens. From these fluorescent images, we find that fluorescent intensity of sfGFP1-10 is stronger than fluorescent intensity of sfGFP11 and both of them are weak. It corresponds with our expectation that either of separate part of sfGFP have background expression and sfGFP1-10, which is longer, may be brighter after excitation.

However, when the PSB1C3 carrying the part of sfGFP11 and the PSB1A3 carrying the part of sfGFP1-10 ware expressed together in E.Coli, it doesn't present stronger fluorescence intensity than either plasmid is expressed in E.Coli respectively. There are a few reasons can explain it. Firstly, different metabolic stress of two plamids causes indistinct results. PSB1C3 carrying sfGFP11, whose gene length is shorter, may have higher expression level than PSB1A3 carry sfGFP1-10. Secondly, there is obvious fluorescence quenching after excitation. Therefore, results of fluorescent images and fluorescent images appear that co-expression of sfGFP1-10 and sfGFP11 has weaker fluorescence intensity. Thirdly, because sfGFP1-10 and sfGFP11 don’t express in E.Coli at 1:1 ratio, the collision probability may be lower than our expectation.