|
|
| Line 8: |
Line 8: |
| | Methods | | Methods |
| | | | |
| − | The sequence for the desired segment of PctA was taken from the Pseudomonas genome database (3). The second part of the chimera, Tar’s cytoplasmatic region, was obtained from the iGEM parts catalog. Amino acids sequence of the LBD and HAMP of PctA was determined to be from 1 to 134 and this of the signaling region of Tar was determined to be 296-553 (Figure 1a).
| |
| | | | |
| − |
| |
| − | Figure 1: (a) Amino acids sequence of PctA-Tar chimera (1) (b) PctA-Tar chimera crystallography
| |
| − |
| |
| − | The plasmid carrying the chimera was transformed into receptorless bacteria- UU1250 (Parkinson J S, University of Utah) and the presence of the DNA sequence was verified by a colony PCR and sequencing.
| |
| − | In order to test the motility of our strain, chemotaxis assays were performed. First, swarming assay was conducted using a poor BA medium. Note that with a TB medium the strain failed to show decisive results, probably due to high concentration of amino acids which resulted in no movement.
| |
| − | Following the swarming assay, a GFP gene was fused to the chimera to verify the migration of the chemoreceptor to the poles of the bacterial membrane.
| |
| − | In addition, a protocol for a chemotaxis assay on chip for repellent response was constructed, making us the first group to ever show this kind of assay. A receptorless strain containing a PctA-Tar chimera plasmid (pSB1A2 was served as vector) and a blue chromoprotein plasmid (pSB1C3 was served as a vector with J23100+K592009 biobricks) was cloned. This clone resulted in blue bacteria expressing the PctA-Tar chimera. The strain was confined into a commercial ibidi microchannel while Trichloroethylene (TCE) served as a repellent. TCE in the concentration of 10-3M (0.13 g/lit) was inserted through the well and the bacterial movement was monitored throughout the entire experiment.
| |
| | | | |
| | Results | | Results |
| | | | |
| − | The strain containing the PctA-Tar chimera showed a significant movement on the swarming assay with a BA medium. On figure 2 the swarming assay of our strain is shown compared to our negative control (UU1250) and our positive control (∆Z). Hence, the PctA-Tar chimera is expressed and bacterial movement is mediated by it.
| |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| − | Figur 2: Swarming assay for attractant response of the PctA-Tar chimera. From left to right: PctA chimera, UU1250, ∆Z.
| + | conclusion |
| | | | |
| − | As for the GFP fusion, the clone exhibited fluorescence on the polar parts of the bacterial membrane (Figure 3), indicating for a proper migration of the chimera to the poles of the membrane, as expected.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Figure 3: GFP fused to the PctA-Chimera is located in the polar part of the bacterial membrane. From left to right: PctA-Tar strain, cloned Tar strain.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Moreover, a repellent response was shown while using our new chemotaxis assay for repellent response. The bacterial movement away from the TCE was distinguished to the naked eye and significant.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | conclution
| |
| | | | |
| − | Using our strain containing the PctA-Tar chimera we showed a modified response of the Tar chemoreceptor to substances which are natural attractants and repellents of PctA as it found originally in the bacterium Pseudomonas
| |
| − | Aeruginosa. Therefore, this work serves as a decisive proof of concept for our S. Tar platform and it has valuable scientific meanings for our project.
| |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| − | 1)Reyes-Darias, J.A., Yang, Y., Sourjik, V., and Krell, T. (2015). Correlation between signal input and output in PctA and | + | 1) |
| − | PctB amino acid chemoreceptor of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Mol. Microbiol. 96, 513–525.
| + | |
| − | 2) https://eu.idtdna.com/site/order/gblockentry
| + | |
| − | 3) http://www.pseudomonas.com/feature/show?id=111456
| + | |
