Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K1689009"
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
− | '''Figure 2. SDS-PAGE of purified Cluc-dCas9 fusion | + | '''Figure 2. SDS-PAGE of purified C-luc-dCas9 fusion protein''' |
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | [[File:Peking-CRISPR-Figure2.png|700px|]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Figure 3. Working mechanism of the paired dCas9 (PC) reporter system.''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | We thoroughly optimized the configuration of our PC reporter system (see [http://2015.igem.org/Team:Peking/Design/PC_Reporter Methods]). Provided that the initial binding of dCas9 to DNA depends on the protospacer adjacent motif (PAM, a short 3’ motif adjacent to target sequence), four sets of sgRNA orientation settings were tested (Figure 4a). To find how split luciferase-dCas9 fusion strategy influences our PC reporter system, we constructed and tested N-luc-dCas9[https://parts.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K1689010 (BBa_K1689010)], dCas9-N-luc [https://parts.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K1689008 (BBa_K1689008) ]fusion strategy to pair with C-luc-dCas9 respectively (Figure 4b). | ||
+ | |||
+ | a | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[File:Peking-44.png|700px|]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | b | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[File:Peking-Cluc.png|700px|]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Figure 4. Thorough optimization on the configuration of our PC reporter system. ''' (a) 4 different sgRNA orientation settings. In orientation PAM-out, the pair of PAM sequences are distal from the spacer sequence, with the 5' end of the sgRNA adjacent to the spacer; in orientation PAM-in, the pair of PAM sequences are adjacent to the spacer sequence, with the 3' end of the sgRNA in proximity to the spacer; in orientation PAM-direct 1 and PAM-direct 2, one PAM sequence is adjacent to and another distal from the spacer. (b) 4 different protein fusion strategies for the integration of split luciferase fragments into dCa9. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | We chose N-luc-dCas9/C-luc-dCas9 fusion proteins with sgRNA orientation PAM-out for the following measurement because it presents the highest signal and robustness. Then we validated its specificity and sensitivity. Specificity test was carried out to distinguish the target plasmid [https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K909009 (BBa_K909009)] from different non-specific controls (Figure 5a,b,c). The results showed that the luminescence intensity using the target is significantly higher than that of non-specific controls (Figure 5d). | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[File:Peking-CRISPR-Figure7.png|700px|]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | '''Figure 5. Specificity test of PC reporter system.''' (a) Positive target with two sites recognized simultaneously by a pair of split luciferase-dCas9:sgRNA complexes. (b) Control with only one site recognized by "half pair". (c) Negative control with no site to be recognized. (d) Experimental data. Error bars denote s.d.; n=3. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Then, we tested the sensitivity of PC reporter system. As shown in Figure 5, PC reporter can still work at the concentration of ~0.1nM target for both plasmid (Figure 6a) and crude PCR product (Figure 6b). | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[File:Peking-CRISPR-Figure8.png|700px|]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Figure 6. Exploring the sensitivity of PC reporter using plasmid and PCR product as the target.''' (a) Bioluminescence intensity using different concentrations of plasmid as the target. (b) Bioluminescence intensity using different concentrations of crude PCR product as the target. Both showed that PC reporter was able to detect target DNA at a concentration (0.1 nM). | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ==References== | ||
+ | 1. Lei S. Qi, Matthew H. Larson, Luke A. Gilbert et al. Repurposing CRISPR as an RNA-guided platform for sequence-specific control of gene expression. Cell, 2013, 152: 1173-1183. | ||
+ | |||
+ | 2. Kathryn E. Luker, Matthew C. P. Smith, et al. Kinetics of regulated protein–protein interactions revealed with firefly luciferase complementation imaging in cells and living animals. PNAS, 2004, 101: 12288-12293. | ||
+ | |||
+ | <!-- --> | ||
+ | <span class='h3bb'>Sequence and Features</span> | ||
+ | <partinfo>BBa_K1689009 SequenceAndFeatures</partinfo> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <!-- Uncomment this to enable Functional Parameter display | ||
+ | ===Functional Parameters=== | ||
+ | <partinfo>BBa_K1689009 parameters</partinfo> | ||
+ | <!-- --> |
Latest revision as of 15:54, 27 September 2015
C-luc-dCas9
C-luc-dCas9 fusion protein ORF
A catalytically dead Cas9 (dCas9), when co-expressed with a guide RNA, forms a DNA recognition complex which can bind any sequence [1]. Firefly luciferase, widely used as a reporter, is split into two fragments, namely N-luc and C-luc [2]. Each fragment by itself is inactive; when two fragments are reassembled, the enzymatic activity of the original protein would be reconstituted, providing easily measurable readout.
Peking iGEM 2015 fused C-luc to N terminus of dCas9 (Figure 1) and purified it (Figure 2). Guided by sgRNA, it binds to target DNA sequence. Together with another part, N-luc-dCas9 (BBa_K1689010):sgRNA complex, our paired dCas9 (PC) reporter system would work to (Figure 3) to convert the sequence-specific information of pathogenic bacteria's genome (in our case, M. tuberculosis) into easily readable bioluminescence signal.
Figure 1. Schematic cartoon of C-luc-dCas9 fusion protein.
Figure 2. SDS-PAGE of purified C-luc-dCas9 fusion protein
Figure 3. Working mechanism of the paired dCas9 (PC) reporter system.
We thoroughly optimized the configuration of our PC reporter system (see [http://2015.igem.org/Team:Peking/Design/PC_Reporter Methods]). Provided that the initial binding of dCas9 to DNA depends on the protospacer adjacent motif (PAM, a short 3’ motif adjacent to target sequence), four sets of sgRNA orientation settings were tested (Figure 4a). To find how split luciferase-dCas9 fusion strategy influences our PC reporter system, we constructed and tested N-luc-dCas9(BBa_K1689010), dCas9-N-luc (BBa_K1689008) fusion strategy to pair with C-luc-dCas9 respectively (Figure 4b).
a
b
Figure 4. Thorough optimization on the configuration of our PC reporter system. (a) 4 different sgRNA orientation settings. In orientation PAM-out, the pair of PAM sequences are distal from the spacer sequence, with the 5' end of the sgRNA adjacent to the spacer; in orientation PAM-in, the pair of PAM sequences are adjacent to the spacer sequence, with the 3' end of the sgRNA in proximity to the spacer; in orientation PAM-direct 1 and PAM-direct 2, one PAM sequence is adjacent to and another distal from the spacer. (b) 4 different protein fusion strategies for the integration of split luciferase fragments into dCa9.
We chose N-luc-dCas9/C-luc-dCas9 fusion proteins with sgRNA orientation PAM-out for the following measurement because it presents the highest signal and robustness. Then we validated its specificity and sensitivity. Specificity test was carried out to distinguish the target plasmid (BBa_K909009) from different non-specific controls (Figure 5a,b,c). The results showed that the luminescence intensity using the target is significantly higher than that of non-specific controls (Figure 5d).
Figure 5. Specificity test of PC reporter system. (a) Positive target with two sites recognized simultaneously by a pair of split luciferase-dCas9:sgRNA complexes. (b) Control with only one site recognized by "half pair". (c) Negative control with no site to be recognized. (d) Experimental data. Error bars denote s.d.; n=3.
Then, we tested the sensitivity of PC reporter system. As shown in Figure 5, PC reporter can still work at the concentration of ~0.1nM target for both plasmid (Figure 6a) and crude PCR product (Figure 6b).
Figure 6. Exploring the sensitivity of PC reporter using plasmid and PCR product as the target. (a) Bioluminescence intensity using different concentrations of plasmid as the target. (b) Bioluminescence intensity using different concentrations of crude PCR product as the target. Both showed that PC reporter was able to detect target DNA at a concentration (0.1 nM).
References
1. Lei S. Qi, Matthew H. Larson, Luke A. Gilbert et al. Repurposing CRISPR as an RNA-guided platform for sequence-specific control of gene expression. Cell, 2013, 152: 1173-1183.
2. Kathryn E. Luker, Matthew C. P. Smith, et al. Kinetics of regulated protein–protein interactions revealed with firefly luciferase complementation imaging in cells and living animals. PNAS, 2004, 101: 12288-12293.
Sequence and Features
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]Illegal NheI site found at 1662
- 21INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]Illegal BamHI site found at 3
Illegal BamHI site found at 3941 - 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]Illegal NgoMIV site found at 326
Illegal AgeI site found at 465 - 1000COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]