Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K1384000:Experience"
Vinsonclam (Talk | contribs) (→User Reviews) |
Vinsonclam (Talk | contribs) (→2015 UCLA iGEM) |
||
| (8 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
===Applications of BBa_K1384000=== | ===Applications of BBa_K1384000=== | ||
| + | ====2015 UCLA iGEM==== | ||
| + | We attempted to use BBa_K1384000 to perform Iterative Capped Assembly, but were unsuccessful. We believe that this is due to non-specific binding of the designed sticky end. Please see our user review below for more details. | ||
===User Reviews=== | ===User Reviews=== | ||
| Line 22: | Line 24: | ||
====2015 UCLA iGEM==== | ====2015 UCLA iGEM==== | ||
*This part does not work as intended. We attempted to use this part to perform ICA, but the other pieces required to perform ICA were not present as part of this collection. In addition, the sticky ends present in this Biobrick are non-specific, and will form undesirable concatemers. | *This part does not work as intended. We attempted to use this part to perform ICA, but the other pieces required to perform ICA were not present as part of this collection. In addition, the sticky ends present in this Biobrick are non-specific, and will form undesirable concatemers. | ||
| − | [[File:2015-02-11 ligation test 1abbc2bcca3bc4caab5abbcca.jpg|none|thumb| | + | *We believe the non-specificity of the old pieces is due to a high GC content in the sticky end. In addition, there is only one base pair difference between each of the sticky ends. This may have also contributed to non-specificity. |
| + | *We performed a ligation test using AB, BC, CA sticky ends by ligating two of the monomer pieces together. If the sticky ends work as intended, there would be one ligation band corresponding to the 2-mer product. | ||
| + | [[File:2015-02-11 ligation test 1abbc2bcca3bc4caab5abbcca.jpg|none|thumb|200px|'''Fig.1''' Ligation test using monomer pairs. A represents AB, B is BC, and C is CA. The presence of laddering bands indicates non-specific binding, showing that this Biobrick is unsuitable for use in ICA.]] | ||
*Over the course of summer 2015, we were able to develop a new [http://2015.igem.org/Team:UCLA/Notebook/Spider_Silk_Genetics#ICA_Parts_Collection collection of biobricks]. We were able to successfully use this collection to perform ICA. | *Over the course of summer 2015, we were able to develop a new [http://2015.igem.org/Team:UCLA/Notebook/Spider_Silk_Genetics#ICA_Parts_Collection collection of biobricks]. We were able to successfully use this collection to perform ICA. | ||
| + | *Our new sticky ends had a reduced GC content as well as a two base pair difference between the sticky ends. | ||
| + | *We show below a similar ligation test performed using our parts to examine the ligation behavior of our newly designed sticky ends. | ||
| + | [[File:5 29 2015.jpg|none|thumb|200px|'''Fig. 2''' Ligation test of AB, BC, CA. Lane 1 is A+B, Lane 2 is B+C, Lane 3 is C+A.]] | ||
| + | *In each lane, there is only one ligation product present. This indicates that our redesigned sticky ends work as intended, and serve as an improvement over the older design. | ||
Latest revision as of 01:09, 19 September 2015
This experience page is provided so that any user may enter their experience using this part.
Please enter
how you used this part and how it worked out.
Applications of BBa_K1384000
2015 UCLA iGEM
We attempted to use BBa_K1384000 to perform Iterative Capped Assembly, but were unsuccessful. We believe that this is due to non-specific binding of the designed sticky end. Please see our user review below for more details.
User Reviews
UNIQ4d5f8af6c2db8f8f-partinfo-00000000-QINU UNIQ4d5f8af6c2db8f8f-partinfo-00000001-QINU
2015 UCLA iGEM
- This part does not work as intended. We attempted to use this part to perform ICA, but the other pieces required to perform ICA were not present as part of this collection. In addition, the sticky ends present in this Biobrick are non-specific, and will form undesirable concatemers.
- We believe the non-specificity of the old pieces is due to a high GC content in the sticky end. In addition, there is only one base pair difference between each of the sticky ends. This may have also contributed to non-specificity.
- We performed a ligation test using AB, BC, CA sticky ends by ligating two of the monomer pieces together. If the sticky ends work as intended, there would be one ligation band corresponding to the 2-mer product.
- Over the course of summer 2015, we were able to develop a new [http://2015.igem.org/Team:UCLA/Notebook/Spider_Silk_Genetics#ICA_Parts_Collection collection of biobricks]. We were able to successfully use this collection to perform ICA.
- Our new sticky ends had a reduced GC content as well as a two base pair difference between the sticky ends.
- We show below a similar ligation test performed using our parts to examine the ligation behavior of our newly designed sticky ends.
- In each lane, there is only one ligation product present. This indicates that our redesigned sticky ends work as intended, and serve as an improvement over the older design.