Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K1819008"
Laisribovski (Talk | contribs) |
Laisribovski (Talk | contribs) |
||
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
<img style="width:750px; display: block; margin: 20px auto 20px auto;" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/0/09/Team-Brasil-USP_PTest_Lac_GFP_RFP.png" /> | <img style="width:750px; display: block; margin: 20px auto 20px auto;" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/0/09/Team-Brasil-USP_PTest_Lac_GFP_RFP.png" /> | ||
− | <p><center | + | <p><center>Figure 3 - Fluorescence per cell for pLac, normalized by the fluorescence with no induction. We see that with IPTG, GFP activity incresases and RFP activity decreases, as it should happen.</center></p> |
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
<img style="width:750px; display: block; margin: 20px auto 20px auto;" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/5/53/Team-Brasil-USP_PTest_Rham_GFP_RFP.png" /> | <img style="width:750px; display: block; margin: 20px auto 20px auto;" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/5/53/Team-Brasil-USP_PTest_Rham_GFP_RFP.png" /> | ||
− | <p><center | + | <p><center>Figure 4 - Fluorescence per cell for each promoter, normalized by the fluorescence with no induction. Not only the induced activity is lower than the activity without induction - for the first 3 concentrations of Rhamnose -, but also the RFP is also growing.</center></p> |
</html> | </html> | ||
Revision as of 21:19, 18 September 2015
Promoter test circuit to analyze the kill switch efficiency
BBa_K1819008 construction indicates lactose promoter (pLac) efficiency to control a TetR promoter inhibited by TetR protein. This circuit was used to verify a kill switch mechanism (See more details in Brasil-USP team wiki)
In the absence of pLac inductor (Lactose or IPTG), RFP will be constitutively expressed under TetR promoter control. If inducer is added, TetR promoter is repressed and, consequently, RFP expression ceases and GFP expression starts.
Characterization
DH5-alpha
We first started with DH5α. For protocols, we refer to our Protocols section. We evaluated the fluorescence per cell by measuring Optical Density (OD) of our colonies and their fluorescences. We show in figures 1 and 2 our results.
Except for Rhamose, fluorescence was very weak and basically at the level of our negative control (E. Coli without plasmid), confirmed by a Mann-Whitney U test. Rhamnose showed some level of activity which would be considered weak, compared to, for instance, our Interlab Results. Finally, no considerable changes were detected in the RFP measures. Since there results are not good indicatives, we performed this experiment three different times (to reduce possible experimental artifacts with assembling or other steps in our protocol). Yet we have always observed the same behavior consistently.
BL21 DE3
We performed the same tests in BL21 strain. For this test, Arabinose was not used as we couldn't confirm its transformation in our gels. For protocols, we refer to our Protocols section. Again, our colonies were all in log phase (omitted) when we measured their fluorescence over time. Our results are in figure 3 and 4.
Sequence and Features
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
- 21COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
- 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]Illegal AgeI site found at 2437
Illegal AgeI site found at 2549 - 1000INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]Illegal BsaI.rc site found at 870