Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K1725000"
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<partinfo>BBa_K1725000 short</partinfo> | <partinfo>BBa_K1725000 short</partinfo> | ||
| − | + | This promoter was characterised by driving expression of GFP with two different Ribosome Binding Sites, as found in the BioBricks E5501 and I13500. | |
| − | + | GFP fluorescence of K1725001, K1725002, K1725021, K1725022, K1725082, and E5504 with plasmid backbone pSB3K3 was measured to compare the relative strengths of promoters K1725000 and K1725020 to a promoter already well documented in the registry, R0040. Figure 3 shows the fluorescence scan image and a graph of approximate molecules of GFP per cell. These results indicated that K1725000 is a significantly stronger promoter than R0040 or K1725020. It also further confirms that B0034 is a stronger ribosome binding site that B0032. | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
<!-- Add more about the biology of this part here | <!-- Add more about the biology of this part here | ||
Revision as of 19:50, 16 September 2015
PhlF repressible promoter
This promoter was characterised by driving expression of GFP with two different Ribosome Binding Sites, as found in the BioBricks E5501 and I13500.
GFP fluorescence of K1725001, K1725002, K1725021, K1725022, K1725082, and E5504 with plasmid backbone pSB3K3 was measured to compare the relative strengths of promoters K1725000 and K1725020 to a promoter already well documented in the registry, R0040. Figure 3 shows the fluorescence scan image and a graph of approximate molecules of GFP per cell. These results indicated that K1725000 is a significantly stronger promoter than R0040 or K1725020. It also further confirms that B0034 is a stronger ribosome binding site that B0032.
Sequence and Features
Assembly Compatibility:
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
- 21COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
- 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
- 1000COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]