Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K1321346:Experience"

(→‎Applications of BBa_K1321346)
(→‎Applications of BBa_K1321346)
Line 9: Line 9:
 
Our first assay was performed to determine the relative strengths of various CBDs’ binding to bacterial cellulose. These were represented by the percentage fluorescence left from CBDs fused to ([https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1321337 sfGFP (RFC25)])  bound to bacterial cellulose discs, when subjected to various washes. Full protocol can be found  ([http://2014.igem.org/Team:Imperial/Protocols here])   
 
Our first assay was performed to determine the relative strengths of various CBDs’ binding to bacterial cellulose. These were represented by the percentage fluorescence left from CBDs fused to ([https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1321337 sfGFP (RFC25)])  bound to bacterial cellulose discs, when subjected to various washes. Full protocol can be found  ([http://2014.igem.org/Team:Imperial/Protocols here])   
  
−
In the same assay, results suggested that dCBD, CBDcex and >>>>> (all fused to sfGFP) had greatest ability to bind bacterial cellulose, after three washes with dH2O, PBS and 5% BSA. It was determined that the fusion with CBDclos was, on average, our fourth strongest CBD, in comparison other CBDs tested.  
+
In the same assay, results suggested that dCBD, CBDcex and cipA (all fused to sfGFP) had greatest ability to bind bacterial cellulose, after three washes with dH2O, PBS and 5% BSA. It was determined that the fusion with CBDclos was, on average, our fourth strongest CBD, in comparison other CBDs tested.  
  
  

Revision as of 04:48, 2 November 2014


This experience page is provided so that any user may enter their experience using this part.
Please enter how you used this part and how it worked out.

Applications of BBa_K1321346

As part of our project we carried out an assay to determine the relative binding ability of CBD-sfGFP fusions to bacterial cellulose.

Our first assay was performed to determine the relative strengths of various CBDs’ binding to bacterial cellulose. These were represented by the percentage fluorescence left from CBDs fused to (sfGFP (RFC25)) bound to bacterial cellulose discs, when subjected to various washes. Full protocol can be found ([http://2014.igem.org/Team:Imperial/Protocols here])

In the same assay, results suggested that dCBD, CBDcex and cipA (all fused to sfGFP) had greatest ability to bind bacterial cellulose, after three washes with dH2O, PBS and 5% BSA. It was determined that the fusion with CBDclos was, on average, our fourth strongest CBD, in comparison other CBDs tested.


Figure 1 - CBD-sfGFP binding strength after three dH2O washes
Figure 2 - CBD-sfGFP binding strength after three 70%Ethanol washes
Figure 3 - CBD-sfGFP binding strength after three PBS washes
Figure 4 - CBD-sfGFP binding strength after three BSA washes

User Reviews

UNIQf8a39977c6a56736-partinfo-00000000-QINU UNIQf8a39977c6a56736-partinfo-00000001-QINU